<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-11T21:21:24Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="3971" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:3971</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:34:44Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Advice Lower Bounds for the Dense Model Theorem</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Watson, Thomas</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Pseudorandomness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>advice lower bounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>dense model theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We prove a lower bound on the amount of nonuniform advice needed by black-box reductions for the Dense Model Theorem of Green, Tao, and Ziegler, and of Reingold, Trevisan, Tulsiani, and Vadhan. The latter theorem roughly says that for every distribution D that is delta-dense in a distribution that is epsilon'-indistinguishable from uniform, there exists a "dense model" for D, that is, a distribution that is delta-dense in the uniform distribution and is epsilon-indistinguishable from D. This epsilon-indistinguishability is with respect to an arbitrary small class of functions F. For the natural case where epsilon' &gt;=  Omega(epsilon delta) and epsilon &gt;= delta^{O(1)}, our lower bound implies that Omega(sqrt{(1/epsilon)log(1/delta)} log|F|) advice bits are necessary. There is only a polynomial gap between our lower bound and the best upper bound for this case (due to Zhang), which is O((1/epsilon^2)log(1/delta) log|F|). Our lower bound can be viewed as an analog of list size lower bounds for list-decoding of error-correcting codes, but for "dense model decoding" instead. Our proof introduces some new techniques which may be of independent interest, including an analysis of a majority of majorities of p-biased bits. The latter analysis uses an extremely tight lower bound on the tail of the binomial distribution, which we could not find in the literature.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Thomas Watson</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 20, 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.634</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-39717</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.634</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
