<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-10T20:05:05Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="4627" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:4627</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:35:09Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Extracting Imperative Programs from Proofs: In-place Quicksort</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Berger, Ulrich</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Seisenberger, Monika</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Woods, Gregory J. M.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Program Extraction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Verification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Realizability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Imperative Programs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>In-Place Quicksort,Computational Monads</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Minlog</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The process of program extraction is primarily associated with&#13;
functional programs with less focus on imperative program extraction. In this paper we consider a standard problem for imperative programming: In-place Quicksort. We formalize a proof that every array of natural numbers can be sorted and apply a realizability&#13;
interpretation to extract a program from the proof. Using monads we&#13;
are able to exhibit the inherent imperative nature of the extracted&#13;
program. We see this as a first step towards an automated extraction of imperative programs. The case study is carried out in the interactive proof assistant Minlog.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Ulrich Berger and Monika Seisenberger and Gregory J. M. Woods</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 26, 19th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2013)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2013.84</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-46274</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2013.84</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
