<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T04:54:14Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5257" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5257</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:29:47Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>WCET and Mixed-Criticality: What does Confidence in WCET Estimations Depend Upon?</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Altmeyer, Sebastian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lisper, Björn</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Maiza, Claire</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Reineke, Jan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rochange, Christine</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>mixed criticality</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>WCET analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>confidence in WCET estimates</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Mixed-criticality systems integrate components of different criticality. Different criticality levels require different levels of confidence in the correct behavior of a component. One aspect of correctness is timing. Confidence in worst-case execution time (WCET) estimates depends on the process by which they have been obtained. A somewhat naive view is that static WCET analyses determines safe bounds in which we can have absolute confidence, while measurement-based approaches are inherently unreliable. In this paper, we refine this view by exploring sources of doubt in the correctness of both static and measurement-based WCET analysis.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Sebastian Altmeyer and Björn Lisper and Claire Maiza and Jan Reineke and Christine Rochange</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of OASIcs, Volume 47, 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.65</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-52574</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.65</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
