<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T08:19:28Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5311" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5311</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:36:17Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Improved NP-Inapproximability for 2-Variable Linear Equations</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Håstad, Johan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Huang, Sangxia</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Manokaran, Rajsekar</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>O’Donnell, Ryan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wright, John</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>approximability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>unique games</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>linear equation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gadget</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>linear programming</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>An instance of the 2-Lin(2) problem is a system of equations of the form "x_i + x_j = b (mod 2)". Given such a system in which it's possible to satisfy all but an epsilon fraction of the equations, we show it is NP-hard to satisfy all but a C*epsilon fraction of the equations, for any C &lt; 11/8 = 1.375 (and any 0 &lt; epsilon &lt;= 1/8).  The previous best result, standing for over 15 years, had 5/4 in place of 11/8.  Our result provides the best known NP-hardness even for the Unique Games problem, and it also holds for the special case of Max-Cut. The precise factor 11/8 is unlikely to be best possible; we also give a conjecture concerning analysis of Boolean functions which, if true, would yield a larger hardness factor of 3/2.&#13;
&#13;
Our proof is by a modified gadget reduction from a pairwise-independent predicate.  We also show an inherent limitation to this type of gadget reduction.  In particular, any such reduction can never establish a hardness factor C greater than 2.54. Previously, no such limitation on gadget reductions was known.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Johan Håstad and Sangxia Huang and Rajsekar Manokaran and Ryan O’Donnell and John Wright</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 40, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2015)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2015.341</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-53112</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2015.341</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
