<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-16T20:04:20Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5679" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5679</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:26:26Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Present and Future of Formal Argumentation (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15362)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Gabbay, Dov M.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Giacomin, Massimiliano</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Liao, Beishui</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>van der Torre, Leendert</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Argumentation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Non-monotonic Logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Multi-Agent Systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15362 "Present and Future of Formal Argumentation". &#13;
The goal of this Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop was to gather the world leading experts in formal argumentation in order to develop a SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) &#13;
analysis of the current state of the research in this field and to draw accordingly some strategic lines to ensure its successful development in the future.&#13;
A critical survey of the field has been carried out through individual presentations and collective discussions.&#13;
Moreover, working group activity lead to identify several open problems in argumentation.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Dov M. Gabbay and Massimiliano Giacomin and Beishui Liao and Leendert van der Torre</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 5, Issue 8 (2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>Article</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagRep.5.8.74</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-56792</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.5.8.74</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
