<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T21:56:20Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5714" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5714</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:36:54Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Dense Subset Sum May Be the Hardest</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Austrin, Per</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kaski, Petteri</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Koivisto, Mikko</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nederlof, Jesper</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>subset sum</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>additive combinatorics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>exponential-time algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>homo-morphic hashing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>littlewood–offord problem</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The SUBSET SUM problem asks whether a given set of n positive integers contains a subset of elements that sum up to a given target t. It is an outstanding open question whether the O^*(2^{n/2})-time algorithm for SUBSET SUM by Horowitz and Sahni [J. ACM 1974] can be beaten in the worst-case setting by a "truly faster", O^*(2^{(0.5-delta)*n})-time algorithm, with some constant delta &gt; 0. Continuing an earlier work [STACS 2015], we study SUBSET SUM parameterized by the maximum bin size beta, defined as the largest number of subsets of the n input integers that yield the same sum. For every epsilon &gt; 0 we give a truly faster algorithm for instances with beta &lt;= 2^{(0.5-epsilon)*n}, as well as instances with beta &gt;= 2^{0.661n}. Consequently, we also obtain a characterization in terms of the popular density parameter n/log_2(t): if all instances of density at least 1.003 admit a truly faster algorithm, then so does every instance. This goes against the current intuition that instances of density 1 are the hardest, and therefore is a step toward answering the open question in the affirmative. Our results stem from a novel combinatorial analysis of mixings of earlier algorithms for SUBSET SUM and a study of an extremal question in additive combinatorics connected to the problem of Uniquely Decodable Code Pairs in information theory.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Per Austrin and Petteri Kaski and Mikko Koivisto and Jesper Nederlof</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 47, 33rd Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.13</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-57143</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.13</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
