<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T03:28:02Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5844" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5844</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:37:08Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Average-Case Lower Bounds and Satisfiability Algorithms for Small Threshold Circuits</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Chen, Ruiwen</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Santhanam, Rahul</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Srinivasan, Srikanth</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>threshold circuit</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>satisfiability algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>circuit lower bound</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We show average-case lower bounds for explicit Boolean functions against bounded-depth threshold circuits with a superlinear number of wires. We show that for each integer d &gt; 1, there is epsilon_d &gt; 0 such that Parity has correlation at most 1/n^{Omega(1)} with depth-d threshold circuits which have at most n^{1+epsilon_d} wires, and the Generalized Andreev Function has correlation at most 1/2^{n^{Omega(1)}} with depth-d threshold circuits which have at most n^{1+epsilon_d} wires. Previously, only worst-case lower bounds in this setting were known [Impagliazzo/Paturi/Saks, SIAM J. Comp., 1997].&#13;
&#13;
We use our ideas to make progress on several related questions. We give satisfiability algorithms beating brute force search for depth-$d$ threshold circuits with a superlinear number of wires. These are the first such algorithms for depth greater than 2. We also show that Parity cannot be computed by polynomial-size AC^0 circuits with n^{o(1)} general threshold gates. Previously no lower bound for Parity in this setting could handle more than log(n) gates. This result also implies subexponential-time learning algorithms for AC^0 with n^{o(1)} threshold gates under the uniform distribution. In addition, we give almost optimal bounds for the number of gates in a depth-d threshold circuit computing Parity on average, and show average-case lower bounds for threshold formulas ofany depth. &#13;
&#13;
Our techniques include adaptive random restrictions, anti-concentration and the structural theory of linear threshold functions, and bounded-read Chernoff bounds.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Ruiwen Chen and Rahul Santhanam and Srikanth Srinivasan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 50, 31st Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2016.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-58447</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2016.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
