<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-10T12:07:51Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5977" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5977</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:37:25Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Proving Correctness of Logically Decorated Graph Rewriting Systems</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Brenas, Jon Haël</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Echahed, Rachid</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Strecker, Martin</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Graph Rewriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Hoare Logic,Combinatory PDL</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Rewrite Strategies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Program Verification</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We first introduce the notion of logically decorated rewriting systems where the left-hand sides are endowed with logical formulas which help to express positive as well as negative application  conditions, in addition to classical pattern-matching. These systems are defined using graph structures and an extension of combinatory propositional&#13;
dynamic logic, CPDL, with restricted universal programs, called C2PDL. In a second step, we tackle the  problem of proving the correctness of logically decorated graph rewriting systems by using a Hoare-like calculus. We  introduce a notion  of specification defined as a tuple (Pre, Post, R, S) with Pre and Post being formulas of C2PDL, R a rewriting  system and S a rewriting strategy. We provide a sound  calculus which infers proof obligations of the considered specifications and establish the decidability of the verification problem of the (partial) correctness of the considered specifications.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Jon Haël Brenas and Rachid Echahed and Martin Strecker</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 52, 1st International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.14</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-59778</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.14</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
