<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T12:53:56Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="5996" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:5996</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:37:26Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Non-Omega-Overlapping TRSs are UN</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kahrs, Stefan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Smith, Connor</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>consistency</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>omega-substitutions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>uniqueness of normal forms</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This paper solves problem #79 of RTA's list of open &#13;
problems --- in the positive.  If the rules of a TRS do not overlap w.r.t.&#13;
substitutions of infinite terms then the TRS has unique normal forms.&#13;
We solve the problem by reducing the problem to one of consistency for&#13;
"similar" constructor term rewriting systems.  For this we introduce&#13;
a new proof technique.  We define a relation ⇓ that is&#13;
consistent by construction, and which --- if transitive --- would&#13;
coincide with the rewrite system's equivalence relation =R.&#13;
&#13;
We then prove the transitivity of ⇓ by coalgebraic&#13;
reasoning.  Any concrete proof for instances of this relation only&#13;
refers to terms of some finite coalgebra, and we then construct an&#13;
equivalence relation on that coalgebra which coincides with ⇓.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Stefan Kahrs and Connor Smith</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 52, 1st International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.22</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-59968</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.22</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
