<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-24T11:52:16Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="602" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:602</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:46Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The optimal sequence compression</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Andreev, Alexander E.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Compression</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>partial boolean function</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This paper presents the optimal compression for sequences with&#13;
undefined values. &#13;
&#13;
Let we have $(N-m)$ undefined and $m$ defined positions in the&#13;
boolean sequence $vv V$ of length $N$. The sequence code length&#13;
can't be less then $m$ in general case, otherwise at least two&#13;
sequences will have the same code.&#13;
&#13;
We present the coding algorithm which generates codes of almost $m$&#13;
length, i.e. almost equal to the lower bound.&#13;
&#13;
The paper presents the decoding circuit too. The circuit has low&#13;
complexity which depends from the inverse density of defined values&#13;
$D(vv V) = frac{N}{m}$.&#13;
&#13;
The decoding circuit includes RAM and random logic. It performs&#13;
sequential decoding. The total RAM size is proportional to the&#13;
$$logleft(D(vv V)&#13;
ight)  ,$$&#13;
the number of random logic cells is proportional to&#13;
$$log logleft(D(vv V)&#13;
ight) * left(log log logleft(D(vv V)&#13;
ight)&#13;
ight)^2  .$$&#13;
So the decoding circuit will be small enough even for the very low&#13;
density sequences. The decoder complexity doesn't depend of the&#13;
sequence length at all.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Alexander E. Andreev</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6111, Complexity of Boolean Functions (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.06111.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-6025</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06111.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
