<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T09:01:38Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="6463" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:6463</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:38:21Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Computational and Proof Complexity of Partial String Avoidability</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Itsykson, Dmitry</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Okhotin, Alexander</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Oparin, Vsevolod</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>partial strings</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>partial words</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>avoidability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proof complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>PSPACE-completeness</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The partial string avoidability problem, also known as partial word avoidability, is stated as follows: given a finite set of strings with possible ``holes'' (undefined symbols), determine whether there exists any two-sided infinite string containing no substrings from this set, assuming that a hole matches every symbol.&#13;
The problem is known to be NP-hard and in PSPACE, and this paper establishes its PSPACE-completeness.&#13;
Next, string avoidability over the binary alphabet is interpreted as a version of conjunctive normal form (CNF) satisfiability problem (SAT), with each clause having infinitely many shifted variants.&#13;
Non-satisfiability of these formulas can be proved using variants of classical propositional proof systems, augmented with derivation rules for shifting constraints (such as clauses, inequalities, polynomials, etc).&#13;
Two results on their proof complexity are established.&#13;
First, there is a particular formula that has a short refutation in Resolution with shift, but requires classical proofs of exponential size (Resolution, Cutting Plane, Polynomial Calculus, etc.).&#13;
At the same time, exponential lower bounds for shifted versions of classical proof systems are established.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Dmitry Itsykson and Alexander Okhotin and Vsevolod Oparin</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 58, 41st International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2016.51</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-64637</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2016.51</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
