<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T01:29:18Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="6479" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:6479</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:38:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Piecewise Testable Languages and Nondeterministic Automata</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Masopust, Tomás</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>automata</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>logics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>languages</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>k-piecewise testability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>nondeterminism</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>A regular language is k-piecewise testable if it is a finite boolean combination of languages of the form Sigma^* a_1 Sigma^* ... Sigma^* a_n Sigma^*, where a_i in Sigma and 0 &lt;= n &lt;= k. Given a DFA A and k &gt;= 0, it is an NL-complete problem to decide whether the language L(A) is piecewise testable and, for k &gt;= 4, it is coNP-complete to decide whether the language L(A) is k-piecewise testable. It is known that the depth of the minimal DFA serves as an upper bound on k. Namely, if L(A) is piecewise testable, then it is k-piecewise testable for k equal to the depth of A. In this paper, we show that some form of nondeterminism does not violate this upper bound result. Specifically, we define a class of NFAs, called ptNFAs, that recognize piecewise testable languages and show that the depth of a ptNFA provides an (up to exponentially better) upper bound on k than the minimal DFA. We provide an application of our result, discuss the relationship between k-piecewise testability and the depth of NFAs, and study the complexity of k-piecewise testability for ptNFAs.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Tomás Masopust</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 58, 41st International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2016.67</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-64799</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2016.67</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
