<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T10:22:27Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="6576" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:6576</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-05-14T15:26:13Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The Logical Strength of Büchi's Decidability Theorem</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kolodziejczyk, Leszek Aleksander</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Michalewski, Henryk</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Pradic, Cécilia</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Skrzypczak, Michal</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>nondeterministic automata</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>monadic second-order logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Büchi's theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>additive Ramsey's theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reverse mathematics</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study the strength of axioms needed to prove various results related to automata on infinite words and Büchi's theorem on the decidability of the MSO theory of (N, less_or_equal). We prove that the following are equivalent over the weak second-order arithmetic theory RCA:&#13;
&#13;
1. Büchi's complementation theorem for nondeterministic automata on infinite words,&#13;
&#13;
2. the decidability of the depth-n fragment of the MSO theory of (N, less_or_equal), for each n greater than 5,&#13;
&#13;
3. the induction scheme for Sigma^0_2 formulae of arithmetic.&#13;
&#13;
Moreover, each of (1)-(3) is equivalent to the additive version of Ramsey's Theorem for pairs, often used in proofs of (1); each of (1)-(3) implies McNaughton's determinisation theorem for automata on infinite words; and each of (1)-(3) implies the "bounded-width" version of König's Lemma, often used in proofs of McNaughton's theorem.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Leszek Aleksander Kolodziejczyk and Henryk Michalewski and Cécilia Pradic and Michal Skrzypczak</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 62, 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.36</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-65765</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.36</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
