<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-29T08:21:10Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="6609" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:6609</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-22T20:53:32Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Anonymous Obstruction-Free (n,k)-Set Agreement with n-k+1 Atomic Read/Write Registers</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Bouzid, Zohir</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Raynal, Michel</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sutra, Pierre</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Anonymous processes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Asynchronous system</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Atomic read/write register</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Consensus</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Fault-tolerance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>$k$-Set agreement</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Obstruction-freedom</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Upper bound</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The k-set agreement problem is a generalization of the consensus problem. Namely, assuming that each process proposes a value, every non-faulty process should decide one of the proposed values, and no more than k different values should be decided. This is a hard problem in the sense that we cannot solve it in an asynchronous system, as soon as k or more processes may crash. One way to sidestep this impossibility result consists in weakening the termination property, requiring that a process must decide a value only if it executes alone during a long enough period of time. This is the well-known obstruction-freedom progress condition. &#13;
&#13;
Consider a system of n anonymous asynchronous processes that communicate through atomic read/write registers, and such that any number of them may crash. In this paper, we address and solve the challenging open problem of designing an obstruction-free k-set agreement algorithm using only (n-k+1) atomic registers. From a shared memory cost point of view, our algorithm is the best algorithm known so far, thereby establishing a new upper bound on the number of registers needed to solve the problem, and in comparison to the previous upper bound, its gain is (n-k) registers. We then extend this algorithm into a space-optimal solution for the repeated version of k-set agreement, and an x-obstruction-free solution that employs 0(n-k+x) atomic registers (with 1 &lt;= x &lt;= k &lt; n).</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Zohir Bouzid and Michel Raynal and Pierre Sutra</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 46, 19th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2015)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2015.18</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-66092</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2015.18</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
