<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T23:18:35Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="6852" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:6852</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:39:02Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Robust Multiplication-Based Tests for Reed-Muller Codes</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Harsha, Prahladh</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Srinivasan, Srikanth</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Polynomials over finite fields</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Schwartz-Zippel lemma</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Low degree testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Low degree long code</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider the following multiplication-based tests to check if a given function f: F^n_q -&gt; F_q is the evaluation of a degree-d polynomial over F_q for q prime.&#13;
&#13;
Test_{e,k}: Pick P_1,...,P_k independent random degree-e polynomials and accept iff the function f P_1 ... P_k is the evaluation of a degree-(d + ek) polynomial.&#13;
&#13;
We prove the robust soundness of the above tests for large values of e, answering a question of Dinur and Guruswami (FOCS 2013). Previous soundness analyses of these tests were known only for the case when either e = 1 or k = 1. Even for the case k = 1 and e &gt; 1, earlier soundness analyses were not robust. &#13;
&#13;
We also analyze a derandomized version of this test, where (for example) the polynomials P_1 ,... , P_k can be the same random polynomial P. This generalizes a result of Guruswami et al. (STOC 2014).&#13;
&#13;
One of the key ingredients that go into the proof of this robust soundness is an extension of the standard Schwartz-Zippel lemma over general finite fields F_q, which may be of independent interest.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Prahladh Harsha and Srikanth Srinivasan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 65, 36th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2016.17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-68524</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2016.17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
