<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T01:02:41Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="697" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:697</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:28:21Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Formal Validation of Pattern Matching code</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kirchner, Claude</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Moreau, Pierre-Etienne</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Reilles, Antoine</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Correctness proofs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>compilers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pattern matching</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>validation</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>When addressing the formal validation of generated software, two main&#13;
alternatives consist either to prove the correctness of compilers or&#13;
to directly validate the generated code.  Here, we focus on directly&#13;
proving the correctness of compiled code issued from powerful&#13;
pattern matching constructions typical of ML like languages or&#13;
rewrite based languages such as ELAN, MAUDE or Tom.&#13;
&#13;
In this context, our first contribution is to define a general&#13;
framework for anchoring algebraic pattern-matching capabilities&#13;
in existing languages like C, Java or ML. Then, using a just enough&#13;
powerful intermediate language, we formalize the behavior of compiled&#13;
code and define the correctness of compiled code with respect to&#13;
pattern-matching behavior.  This allows us to prove the equivalence of&#13;
compiled code correctness with a generic first-order proposition whose&#13;
proof could be achieved via a proof assistant or an automated theorem&#13;
prover. We then extend these results to the multi-match situation&#13;
characteristic of the ML like languages.&#13;
&#13;
The whole approach has been implemented on top of the Tom compiler&#13;
and used to validate the syntactic matching code of the Tom compiler&#13;
itself.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Claude Kirchner and Pierre-Etienne Moreau and Antoine Reilles</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of OASIcs, Volume 3, Workshop on Trustworthy Software (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/OASIcs.TrustworthySW.2006.697</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-6978</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.TrustworthySW.2006.697</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
