<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-16T06:48:57Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="701" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:701</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:28:21Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Explaining Data Type Reduction in the Shape Analysis Framework</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Wachter, Björn</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Canonical abstraction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>data type reduction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model checking</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>parameterized system</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>infinite-state</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Automatic formal verification of systems composed of a large or even unbounded &#13;
number of components is difficult as the state space of these systems is &#13;
prohibitively large. Abstraction techniques automatically construct finite &#13;
approximations of infinite-state systems from which safe information about &#13;
the original system can be inferred. We study two abstraction techniques &#13;
shape analysis, a technique from program analysis, and data type reduction, &#13;
originating from model checking. Until recently we did not properly understand&#13;
how shape analysis and data type reduction relate. In this talk, we shed light&#13;
on this relation in a comprehensive way. This is a step towards a more &#13;
unified view of abstraction employed in the static analysis and model checking&#13;
community.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Björn Wachter</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of OASIcs, Volume 3, Workshop on Trustworthy Software (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/OASIcs.TrustworthySW.2006.701</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7016</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.TrustworthySW.2006.701</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
