<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T19:23:35Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="7101" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:7101</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:39:33Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Step Optimal Implementations of Large Single-Writer Registers</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Chen, Tian Ze</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wei, Yuanhao</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>atomic register</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>regular register</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>wait-free implementation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>single writer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>optimal</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We present two wait-free algorithms for simulating an  l-bit single-writer register from k-bit single-writer registers, for any k &gt;= 1. Our first algorithm has big-theta(l/k) step complexity for both Read and Write and uses big-theta (4^(l-k)) registers. An interesting feature of the algorithm is that Read operations do not write to shared variables. Our second algorithm has big-theta (l/k + (log n)/k) step complexity for both Read and Write, where n is the number of readers, but uses only big-theta (nl/k + n(log n)/k) registers. Combining both algorithms gives an implementation with big-theta (l/k) step complexity using big-theta (nl/k) space for any 1 &lt;= k &lt;  l.&#13;
&#13;
We also prove that any implementation with big-O (l/k) step complexity for Read requires big-omega (l/k) step complexity for Write. Since reading  l-bits requires at least ceiling(l/k) reads of k-bit registers, our lower bound shows that our implementation is step optimal.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Tian Ze Chen and Yuanhao Wei</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.32</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-71010</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.32</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
