<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-17T18:55:03Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="7253" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:7253</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-12T11:58:42Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Mixing Metaphors: Actors as Channels and Channels as Actors</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Fowler, Simon</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lindley, Sam</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wadler, Philip</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Actors</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Channels</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Communication centric Programming Languages</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Channel- and actor-based programming languages are both used in&#13;
practice, but the two are often confused. Languages such as Go&#13;
provide anonymous processes which communicate using buffers or rendezvous points---known as channels---while languages such as Erlang provide addressable processes---known as actors---each with a single incoming message queue.&#13;
&#13;
The lack of a common representation makes it difficult to reason about&#13;
translations that exist in the folklore. We define a calculus&#13;
lambda-ch for typed asynchronous channels, and a calculus lambda-act for&#13;
typed actors. We define translations from lambda-act into lambda-ch and&#13;
lambda-ch into lambda-act and prove that both are type- and&#13;
semantics-preserving.&#13;
&#13;
We show that our approach accounts for synchronisation and selective&#13;
receive in actor systems and discuss future extensions to support guarded&#13;
choice and behavioural types.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Simon Fowler and Sam Lindley and Philip Wadler</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 74, 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.11</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72536</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.11</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
