<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T19:59:25Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="729" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:729</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:43Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Flat counter automata almost everywhere!</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Leroux, Jérôme</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sutre, Grégoire</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Symbolic representation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Infinite state system</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Acceleration</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Meta-transition</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This paper argues that flatness appears as a central notion in the&#13;
verification of counter automata.  A counter automaton is called flat&#13;
when its control graph can be ``replaced'', equivalently w.r.t.&#13;
reachability, by another one with no nested loops.&#13;
&#13;
From a practical view point, we show that flatness is a necessary and&#13;
sufficient condition for termination of accelerated symbolic model&#13;
checking, a generic semi-algorithmic technique implemented in&#13;
successful tools like FAST,  LASH or TReX.&#13;
&#13;
From a theoretical view point, we prove that many known semilinear&#13;
subclasses of counter automata are flat: reversal bounded counter&#13;
machines, lossy vector addition systems with states, reversible Petri nets,&#13;
persistent and conflict-free Petri nets, etc.  Hence, for these subclasses,&#13;
the semilinear reachability set can be computed using a emph{uniform}&#13;
accelerated symbolic procedure (whereas previous algorithms were&#13;
specifically designed for each subclass).</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Jérôme Leroux and Grégoire Sutre</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6081, Software Verification: Infinite-State Model Checking and Static Program Analysis (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.06081.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7297</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06081.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
