<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T06:30:49Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="756" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:756</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:30Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Robustness and Accuracy of Bayesian Information Fusion Systems</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Pavlin, Gregor</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nunnink, Jan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Groen, Frans</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Robust Information Fusion</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Bayesian Networks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Heterogeneous Information</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Modeling Uncertainties</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Modern situation assessment and controlling applications often require efficient &#13;
fusion of large amounts of heterogeneous and uncertain information. In addition, &#13;
fusion results are often mission critical. &#13;
&#13;
It turns out that Bayesian networks (BN) are suitable for a significant class of &#13;
such applications, since they facilitate modeling of very heterogeneous types of &#13;
uncertain information and support efficient belief propagation techniques. BNs are &#13;
based on a rigorous theory which facilitates (i) analysis of the robustness of fusion &#13;
systems and (ii) monitoring of the fusion quality. &#13;
&#13;
We assume domains where situations can be described through sets of discrete random &#13;
variables. A situation corresponds to a set of hidden and observed states that the &#13;
nature `sampled' from some true distribution over the combinations of possible states. &#13;
Thus, in a particular situation certain states materialized while others did not, which &#13;
corresponds to a point-mass distribution over the possible states.  Consequently, the &#13;
state estimation can be reduced to a classification of the possible combinations of &#13;
relevant states. We assume that there exist mappings between hidden states of interest &#13;
and optimal decisions/actions.  &#13;
&#13;
In this context, we consider classification of the states accurate if it is equivalent&#13;
 to the truth in the sense that knowing the truth would not change the action based &#13;
on the classification. Clearly, BNs provide a mapping between the observed symptoms &#13;
and hypotheses about hidden events. Consequently, BNs have a critical impact on the &#13;
fusion accuracy.&#13;
&#13;
We emphasize a fundamental difference between the model accuracy and fusion &#13;
(i.e.classification) accuracy. A BN is a generalization over many possible situations&#13;
 that captures probability distributions over the possible events in the observed &#13;
domain. However, even a perfect generalization does not necessarily support accurate &#13;
classification in a particular situation. We address this problem with the help of the &#13;
Inference Meta Model (IMM) which describes information fusion in BNs from a coarse, &#13;
runtime perspective.&#13;
&#13;
IMM is based on a few realistic assumptions and exposes properties of BNs that are r&#13;
elevant for the construction of inherently robust fusion systems. With the help of IMM &#13;
we show that in BNs featuring many conditionally independent network fragments inference &#13;
can be very insensitive to the modeling parameter values. This implies that fusion can be &#13;
robust, which is especially relevant in many real world applications where we cannot obtain &#13;
precise models due to the lack of sufficient training data or expertise. In addition, &#13;
IMM introduces a reinforcement propagation algorithm that can be used as an alternative &#13;
to the common approaches to inference in BNs. We can show that the classification accuracy &#13;
of this propagation algorithm is asymptotically approaching 1 as the number of conditionally &#13;
independent network fragments increases. Because of these properties, the propagation &#13;
algorithm can be used as a basis for effective detection of misleading fusion results &#13;
as well as discovery of inadequate modeling components and erroneous information sources.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Gregor Pavlin and Jan Nunnink and Frans Groen</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5381, Form and Content in Sensor Networks (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.05381.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7561</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05381.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
