<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-16T00:49:25Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="764" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:764</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:44Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Towards a Final Analysis of Pairing Heaps</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Pettie, Seth</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Data structure</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>heap</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>self-adjusting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>amortized analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Fredman, Sedgewick, Sleator, and Tarjan proposed the &#13;
{em pairing heap} &#13;
as a self-adjusting, streamlined version of the Fibonacci heap.&#13;
It provably supports all priority queue operations in logarithmic&#13;
time and is known to be extremely efficient in practice.&#13;
However, despite its simplicity and empirical superiority, &#13;
the pairing heap is one of the few popular data structures &#13;
whose basic complexity remains open.&#13;
In this paper we prove that pairing heaps support the &#13;
deletemin operation in optimal logarithmic time and all other operations&#13;
(insert, meld, and decreasekey) in time &#13;
$O(2^{2sqrt{loglog n}})$.  This result gives &#13;
the {em first} sub-logarithmic time bound for decreasekey &#13;
and comes close to the &#13;
lower bound of $Omega(loglog n)$ established by Fredman.&#13;
&#13;
Pairing heaps have a well known but poorly understood relationship to&#13;
splay trees and, to date, the transfer of ideas has flowed in one direction:&#13;
from splaying to pairing.   One contribution of this paper is a&#13;
new analysis that reasons explicitly with information-theoretic&#13;
measures.  Whether these ideas could contribute to the analysis&#13;
of splay trees is an open question.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Seth Pettie</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6091, Data Structures (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.06091.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7642</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06091.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
