<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T19:18:38Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="7854" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:7854</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:41:16Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>In-Place Parallel Super Scalar Samplesort (IPSSSSo)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Axtmann, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Witt, Sascha</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ferizovic, Daniel</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sanders, Peter</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>shared memory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>parallel sorting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>in-place algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>comparison-based sorting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>branch prediction</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We present a sorting algorithm that works in-place, executes in parallel, is cache-efficient, avoids branch-mispredictions, and performs work O(n log n) for arbitrary inputs with high probability. The main algorithmic contributions are new ways to make distribution-based algorithms in-place: On the practical side, by using coarse-grained block-based permutations, and on the theoretical side, we show how to eliminate the recursion stack.  Extensive experiments shw that our algorithm IPSSSSo scales well on a variety of multi-core machines. We outperform our closest in-place competitor by a factor of up to 3.  Even as a sequential algorithm, we are up to 1.5 times faster than the closest sequential competitor, BlockQuicksort.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Michael Axtmann and Sascha Witt and Daniel Ferizovic and Peter Sanders</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 87, 25th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2017)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2017.9</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-78542</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2017.9</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
