<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T11:26:18Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="789" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:789</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:53Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>On the Monotonicity of the String Correction Factor for Words with Mismatches</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Apostolico, Alberto</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Pizzi, Cinzia</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Pattern discovery</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Motif</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Over-represented word</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Monotone score</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Correction Factor</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The string correction factor is the term by&#13;
which the probability of a word $w$ needs to be multiplied in order&#13;
to account for character changes or ``errors'' occurring in at most&#13;
$k$ arbitrary positions in that word. The behavior of this factor,&#13;
as a function of $k$ and of the word length, has implications on the&#13;
number of candidates that need to be considered and weighted when&#13;
looking for subwords of a sequence that present unusually recurrent&#13;
replicas within some bounded number of mismatches. Specifically, it&#13;
is seen that over intervals of mono- or bi-tonicity for the&#13;
correction factor, only some of the candidates need be considered.&#13;
This mitigates the computation and leads to tables of&#13;
over-represented words that are more compact to represent and&#13;
inspect. In recent work, expectation and score monotonicity has been&#13;
established for a number of cases of interest, under {em i.i.d.}&#13;
probabilistic assumptions. The present paper reviews the cases of&#13;
bi-tonic behavior for the correction factor, concentrating on the&#13;
instance in which the question is still open.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Alberto Apostolico and Cinzia Pizzi</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6201, Combinatorial and Algorithmic Foundations of Pattern and Association Discovery (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.06201.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7899</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06201.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
