<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T12:35:04Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="8097" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:8097</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:40:48Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Does Looking Inside a Circuit Help?</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Impagliazzo, Russell</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kabanets, Valentine</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kolokolova, Antonina</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>McKenzie, Pierre</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Romani, Shadab</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Black-Box Hypothesis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Rice's theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>circuit complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>SAT</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sensitivity of boolean functions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>decision tree complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The Black-Box Hypothesisstates that any property of Boolean functions decided efficiently (e.g., in BPP)  with inputs represented by circuits can also be decided efficiently in the black-box setting, where an algorithm is given an oracle access to the input function and an upper bound on its circuit size. If this hypothesis is true, then P neq NP. We focus on the consequences of the hypothesis being false, showing that (under general conditions on the structure of a counterexample) it implies a non-trivial algorithm for CSAT. More specifically, we show that if there is a property F of boolean functions such that F has high sensitivity on some input function f of subexponential circuit complexity (which is a sufficient condition for F being a counterexample to the Black-Box Hypothesis), then CSAT  is solvable by a subexponential-size circuit family. Moreover, if such a counterexample F is symmetric, then CSAT is in Ppoly. These results provide some evidence towards the conjecture (made in this paper) that the Black-Box Hypothesis is false if and only if CSAT is easy.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Russell Impagliazzo and Valentine Kabanets and Antonina Kolokolova and Pierre McKenzie and Shadab Romani</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 83, 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-80975</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
