<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T11:15:08Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="8149" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:8149</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:39:21Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Detecting communities is Hard (And Counting Them is Even Harder)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Rubinstein, Aviad</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Community detection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>stable communities</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>quasipolynomial time</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider the algorithmic problem of community detection in networks. Given an undirected friendship graph G, a subset&#13;
S of vertices is an (a,b)-community if: * Every member of the community is friends with an (a)-fraction of the community; and&#13;
* every non-member is friends with at most a (b)-fraction of the&#13;
community. &#13;
&#13;
[Arora, Ge, Sachdeva, Schoenebeck 2012] gave a quasi-polynomial&#13;
time algorithm for enumerating all the (a,b)-communities&#13;
for any constants a&gt;b. &#13;
&#13;
Here, we prove that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH),&#13;
quasi-polynomial time is in fact necessary - and even for a much weaker&#13;
approximation desideratum. Namely, distinguishing between:&#13;
* G contains an (1,o(1))-community; and&#13;
* G does not contain a (b,b+o(1))-community&#13;
for any b.&#13;
&#13;
We also prove that counting the number of (1,o(1))-communities&#13;
requires quasi-polynomial time assuming the weaker #ETH.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Aviad Rubinstein</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 67, 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.42</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-81496</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.42</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
