<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-19T22:52:54Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="830" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:830</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:58Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Choreography Conformance Checking: An Approach based on BPEL and Petri Nets</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>van der Aalst, Wil</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Dumas, Marlon</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ouyang, C.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rozinat, Anne</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Verbeek, H. M. W.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Process mining</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>SOAP messages</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>BPEL</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Petri nets</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Recently, languages such as BPEL and WS-CDL have been proposed to&#13;
describe interactions between services and their behavioral dependencies.&#13;
The emergence of these languages heralds an era where richer service&#13;
descriptions, going beyond WSDL-like interfaces, will be&#13;
available. However, what can these richer service descriptions serve&#13;
for? This talk discussed the use of  event logs of web services and behavioral service descriptions as input for process mining and conformance checking. Conformance checking is the act of verifying whether or not one or more parties stick to an agreed-upon&#13;
behavior, by observing their actual behavior as recorded in message logs. This talk shows that it is possible to&#13;
translate BPEL business abstract processes to Petri nets and to relate SOAP messages to transitions in the Petri net. The approach has been&#13;
implemented in the ProM framework.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Wil van der Aalst and Marlon Dumas and C. Ouyang and Anne Rozinat and H. M. W. Verbeek</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2006</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6291, The Role of Business Processes in Service Oriented Architectures (2006)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.06291.9</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-8307</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06291.9</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
