<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T21:02:51Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="9543" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:9543</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:44:41Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Coalgebraic Theory of Büchi and Parity Automata: Fixed-Point Specifications, Categorically (Invited Tutorial)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Hasuo, Ichiro</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Coalgebra</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>category theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>fixed-point logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>automata</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Büchi automata</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>parity automata</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Coalgebra is a categorical modeling of state-based dynamics. Final coalgebras - as categorical greatest fixed points - play a central role in the theory; somewhat analogously, most coalgebraic proof techniques have been devoted to greatest fixed-point properties such as safety and bisimilarity. In this tutorial, I introduce our recent coalgebraic framework that accommodates those fixed-point specifications which are not necessarily the greatest. It does so specifically by characterizing the accepted languages of Büchi and parity automata in categorical terms. We present two characterizations of accepted languages. The proof for their coincidence offers a unique categorical perspective of the correspondence between (logical) fixed-point specifications and the (combinatorial) parity acceptance condition.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Ichiro Hasuo</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 118, 29th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2018)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2018.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-95430</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2018.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
