7 Search Results for "Ballabriga, Clément"


Volume

OASIcs, Volume 103

20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022)

WCET 2022, July 5, 2022, Modena, Italy

Editors: Clément Ballabriga

Document
Complete Volume
OASIcs, Volume 103, WCET 2022, Complete Volume

Authors: Clément Ballabriga

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 103, 20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022)


Abstract
OASIcs, Volume 103, WCET 2022, Complete Volume

Cite as

20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 103, pp. 1-54, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{ballabriga:OASIcs.WCET.2022,
  title =	{{OASIcs, Volume 103, WCET 2022, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022)},
  pages =	{1--54},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-244-0},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{103},
  editor =	{Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2022},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-166218},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2022},
  annote =	{Keywords: OASIcs, Volume 103, WCET 2022, Complete Volume}
}
Document
Front Matter
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: Clément Ballabriga

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 103, 20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022)


Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Cite as

20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 103, pp. 0:i-0:x, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ballabriga:OASIcs.WCET.2022.0,
  author =	{Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2022)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:x},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-244-0},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{103},
  editor =	{Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2022.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-166227},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2022.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}
Document
Context-sensitive Parametric WCET Analysis

Authors: Clément Ballabriga, Julien Forget, and Giuseppe Lipari

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 47, 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)


Abstract
In this paper, we propose aWCET analysis that focuses on two aspects. First, it supports contextsensitive hardware and software timing effects, meaning that it is sensitive to the execution history of the program and thus can account for effects like cache persistence, triangular loop, etc. Second, it supports the introduction of parameters in both the software model (e.g. parametric loop bounds) and the hardware model (e.g. number of cache misses). WCET computation by static analysis is traditionally handled by the Implicit Path Enumeration Technique (IPET), using an Integer Linear Program (ILP) that is difficult to resolve parametrically. We suggest an alternative tree-based approach. We define a context-sensitive CFG format to express these effects, and we provide an efficient method to process it, giving a parametric WCET formula. Experimental results show that this new method is significantly faster and more accurate than existing parametric approaches.

Cite as

Clément Ballabriga, Julien Forget, and Giuseppe Lipari. Context-sensitive Parametric WCET Analysis. In 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 47, pp. 55-64, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ballabriga_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2015.55,
  author =	{Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment and Forget, Julien and Lipari, Giuseppe},
  title =	{{Context-sensitive Parametric WCET Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)},
  pages =	{55--64},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-95-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{47},
  editor =	{Cazorla, Francisco J.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.55},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-52569},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.55},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parametric, WCET, Real-time, Static analysis}
}
Document
A Generic Framework for Blackbox Components in WCET Computation

Authors: Clément Ballabriga, Hugues Cassé, and Marianne De Michiel

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 10, 9th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'09) (2009)


Abstract
Validation of embedded hard real-time systems requires the computation of the Worst Case Execution Time (WCET). Although these systems make more and more use of Components Off The Shelf (COTS), the current WCET computation methods are usually applied to whole programs: these analysis methods require access to the whole system code, that is incompatible with the use of COTS. In this paper, after discussing the specific cases of the loop bounds estimation and the instruction cache analysis, we show in a generic way how static analysis involved in WCET computation can be pre-computed on COTS in order to obtain component partial results. These partial results can be distributed with the COTS, in order to compute the WCET in the context of a full application. We describe also the information items to include in the partial result, and we propose an XML exchange format to represent these data. Additionally, we show that the partial analysis enables us to reduce the analysis time while introducing very little pessimism.

Cite as

Clément Ballabriga, Hugues Cassé, and Marianne De Michiel. A Generic Framework for Blackbox Components in WCET Computation. In 9th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'09). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 10, pp. 1-12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ballabriga_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2009.2290,
  author =	{Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment and Cass\'{e}, Hugues and De Michiel, Marianne},
  title =	{{A Generic Framework for Blackbox Components in WCET Computation}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'09)},
  pages =	{1--12},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-14-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{10},
  editor =	{Holsti, Niklas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2009.2290},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-22907},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2009.2290},
  annote =	{Keywords: WCET analysis, components, COTS, XML}
}
Document
WCET 2008 -- Report from the Tool Challenge 2008 -- 8th Intl. Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis

Authors: Niklas Holsti, Jan Gustafsson, Guillem Bernat, Clément Ballabriga, Armelle Bonenfant, Roman Bourgade, Hugues Cassé, Daniel Cordes, Albrecht Kadlec, Raimund Kirner, Jens Knoop, Paul Lokuciejewski, Nicholas Merriam, Marianne de Michiel, Adrian Prantl, Bernhard Rieder, Christine Rochange, Pascal Sainrat, and Markus Schordan

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 8, 8th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'08) (2008)


Abstract
Following the successful WCET Tool Challenge in 2006, the second event in this series was organized in 2008, again with support from the ARTIST2 Network of Excellence. The WCET Tool Challenge 2008 (WCC'08) provides benchmark programs and poses a number of "analysis problems" about the dynamic, run-time properties of these programs. The participants are challenged to solve these problems with their program analysis tools. Two kinds of problems are defined: WCET problems, which ask for bounds on the execution time of chosen parts (subprograms) of the benchmarks, under given constraints on input data; and flow-analysis problems, which ask for bounds on the number of times certain parts of the benchmark can be executed, again under some constraints. We describe the organization of WCC'08, the benchmark programs, the participating tools, and the general results, successes, and failures. Most participants found WCC'08 to be a useful test of their tools. Unlike the 2006 Challenge, the WCC'08 participants include several tools for the same target (ARM7, LPC2138), and tools that combine measurements and static analysis, as well as pure static-analysis tools.

Cite as

Niklas Holsti, Jan Gustafsson, Guillem Bernat, Clément Ballabriga, Armelle Bonenfant, Roman Bourgade, Hugues Cassé, Daniel Cordes, Albrecht Kadlec, Raimund Kirner, Jens Knoop, Paul Lokuciejewski, Nicholas Merriam, Marianne de Michiel, Adrian Prantl, Bernhard Rieder, Christine Rochange, Pascal Sainrat, and Markus Schordan. WCET 2008 -- Report from the Tool Challenge 2008 -- 8th Intl. Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis. In 8th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'08). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 8, pp. 1-23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{holsti_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2008.1663,
  author =	{Holsti, Niklas and Gustafsson, Jan and Bernat, Guillem and Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment and Bonenfant, Armelle and Bourgade, Roman and Cass\'{e}, Hugues and Cordes, Daniel and Kadlec, Albrecht and Kirner, Raimund and Knoop, Jens and Lokuciejewski, Paul and Merriam, Nicholas and de Michiel, Marianne and Prantl, Adrian and Rieder, Bernhard and Rochange, Christine and Sainrat, Pascal and Schordan, Markus},
  title =	{{WCET 2008 -- Report from the Tool Challenge 2008 -- 8th Intl. Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{8th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'08)},
  pages =	{1--23},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-10-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{8},
  editor =	{Kirner, Raimund},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2008.1663},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-16637},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2008.1663},
  annote =	{Keywords: WCET analysis, benchmark}
}
Document
Improving the WCET computation time by IPET using control flow graph partitioning

Authors: Clément Ballabriga and Hugues Cassé

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 8, 8th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'08) (2008)


Abstract
Implicit Path Enumeration Technique (IPET) is currently largely used to compute Worst Case Execution Time (WCET) by modeling control flow and architecture using integer linear programming (ILP). As precise architecture effects requires a lot of constraints, the super-linear complexity of the ILP solver makes computation times bigger and bigger. In this paper, we propose to split the control flow of the program into smaller parts where a local WCET can be computed faster - as the resulting ILP system is smaller - and to combine these local results to get the overall WCET without loss of precision. The experimentation in our tool OTAWA with lp_solve solver has shown an average computation improvement of 6.5 times.

Cite as

Clément Ballabriga and Hugues Cassé. Improving the WCET computation time by IPET using control flow graph partitioning. In 8th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'08). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 8, pp. 1-9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ballabriga_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2008.1670,
  author =	{Ballabriga, Cl\'{e}ment and Cass\'{e}, Hugues},
  title =	{{Improving the WCET computation time by IPET using control flow graph partitioning}},
  booktitle =	{8th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'08)},
  pages =	{1--9},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-10-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{8},
  editor =	{Kirner, Raimund},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2008.1670},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-16701},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2008.1670},
  annote =	{Keywords: Static analysis, SESE regions, ILP}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Ballabriga, Clément
  • 3 Cassé, Hugues
  • 1 Bernat, Guillem
  • 1 Bonenfant, Armelle
  • 1 Bourgade, Roman
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Computer systems organization → Real-time systems
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Software performance
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Software safety
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Software verification and validation
  • 2 Theory of computation → Program analysis

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Static analysis
  • 2 WCET analysis
  • 1 COTS
  • 1 Conference Organization
  • 1 Front Matter
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 6 document
  • 1 volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2022
  • 2 2008
  • 1 2009
  • 1 2015

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail