5 Search Results for "Broadbent, Christopher"


Document
On the Power of Quantum Fourier Sampling

Authors: Bill Fefferman and Christopher Umans

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 61, 11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016)


Abstract
A line of work initiated by Terhal and DiVincenzo [Terhal/DiVincenzo, arXiv, 2002] and Bremner, Jozsa, and Shepherd [Bremner/Jozsa/Sheperd, Proc. Royal Soc. A, 2010], shows that restricted classes of quantum computation can efficiently sample from probability distributions that cannot be exactly sampled efficiently on a classical computer, unless the PH collapses. Aaronson and Arkhipov [Aaronson/Arkhipov, J. Theory of Comp., 2013] take this further by considering a distribution that can be sampled efficiently by linear optical quantum computation, that under two feasible conjectures, cannot even be approximately sampled within bounded total variation distance, unless the PH collapses. In this work we use Quantum Fourier Sampling to construct a class of distributions that can be sampled exactly by a quantum computer. We then argue that these distributions cannot be approximately sampled classically, unless the PH collapses, under variants of the Aaronson-Arkhipov conjectures. In particular, we show a general class of quantumly sampleable distributions each of which is based on an "Efficiently Specifiable" polynomial, for which a classical approximate sampler implies an average-case approximation. This class of polynomials contains the Permanent but also includes, for example, the Hamiltonian Cycle polynomial, as well as many other familiar #P-hard polynomials. Since our distribution likely requires the full power of universal quantum computation, while the Aaronson-Arkhipov distribution uses only linear optical quantum computation with noninteracting bosons, why is our result interesting? We can think of at least three reasons: 1. Since the conjectures required in [Aaronson/Arkhipov, J. Theory of Comp., 2013] have not yet been proven, it seems worthwhile to weaken them as much as possible. We do this in two ways, by weakening both conjectures to apply to any "Efficiently Specifiable" polynomial, and by weakening the so-called Anti-Concentration conjecture so that it need only hold for one distribution in a broad class of distributions. 2. Our construction can be understood without any knowledge of linear optics. While this may be a disadvantage for experimentalists, in our opinion it results in a very clean and simple exposition that may be more immediately accessible to computer scientists. 3. It is extremely common for quantum computations to employ “Quantum Fourier Sampling” in the following way: first apply a classically efficient function to a uniform superposition of inputs, then apply a Quantum Fourier Transform followed by a measurement. Our distributions are obtained in exactly this way, where the classically efficient function is related to a (presumed) hard polynomial. Establishing rigorously a robust sense in which the central primitive of Quantum Fourier Sampling is classically hard seems a worthwhile goal in itself.

Cite as

Bill Fefferman and Christopher Umans. On the Power of Quantum Fourier Sampling. In 11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 61, pp. 1:1-1:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fefferman_et_al:LIPIcs.TQC.2016.1,
  author =	{Fefferman, Bill and Umans, Christopher},
  title =	{{On the Power of Quantum Fourier Sampling}},
  booktitle =	{11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-019-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{61},
  editor =	{Broadbent, Anne},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2016.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-66829},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2016.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum Complexity Theory, Sampling Complexity}
}
Document
Quantum-Proof Multi-Source Randomness Extractors in the Markov Model

Authors: Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Christopher Portmann, and Volkher B. Scholz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 61, 11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016)


Abstract
Randomness extractors, widely used in classical and quantum cryptography and other fields of computer science, e.g., derandomization, are functions which generate almost uniform randomness from weak sources of randomness. In the quantum setting one must take into account the quantum side information held by an adversary which might be used to break the security of the extractor. In the case of seeded extractors the presence of quantum side information has been extensively studied. For multi-source extractors one can easily see that high conditional min-entropy is not sufficient to guarantee security against arbitrary side information, even in the classical case. Hence, the interesting question is under which models of (both quantum and classical) side information multi-source extractors remain secure. In this work we suggest a natural model of side information, which we call the Markov model, and prove that any multi-source extractor remains secure in the presence of quantum side information of this type (albeit with weaker parameters). This improves on previous results in which more restricted models were considered or the security of only some types of extractors was shown.

Cite as

Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Christopher Portmann, and Volkher B. Scholz. Quantum-Proof Multi-Source Randomness Extractors in the Markov Model. In 11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 61, pp. 2:1-2:34, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arnonfriedman_et_al:LIPIcs.TQC.2016.2,
  author =	{Arnon-Friedman, Rotem and Portmann, Christopher and Scholz, Volkher B.},
  title =	{{Quantum-Proof Multi-Source Randomness Extractors in the Markov Model}},
  booktitle =	{11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:34},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-019-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{61},
  editor =	{Broadbent, Anne},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2016.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-66830},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2016.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum proof randomness extractors, multisource extractors, device independent quantum cryptography}
}
Document
Saturation-Based Model Checking of Higher-Order Recursion Schemes

Authors: Christopher Broadbent and Naoki Kobayashi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 23, Computer Science Logic 2013 (CSL 2013)


Abstract
Model checking of higher-order recursion schemes (HORS) has recently been studied extensively and applied to higher-order program verification. Despite recent efforts, obtaining a scalable model checker for HORS remains a big challenge. We propose a new model checking algorithm for HORS, which combines two previous, independent approaches to higher-order model checking. Like previous type-based algorithms for HORS, it directly analyzes HORS and outputs intersection types as a certificate, but like Broadbent et al.'s saturation algorithm for collapsible pushdown systems (CPDS), it propagates information backward, in the sense that it starts with target configurations and iteratively computes their pre-images. We have implemented the new algorithm and confirmed that the prototype often outperforms TRECS and CSHORe, the state-of-the-art model checkers for HORS.

Cite as

Christopher Broadbent and Naoki Kobayashi. Saturation-Based Model Checking of Higher-Order Recursion Schemes. In Computer Science Logic 2013 (CSL 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 23, pp. 129-148, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{broadbent_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2013.129,
  author =	{Broadbent, Christopher and Kobayashi, Naoki},
  title =	{{Saturation-Based Model Checking of Higher-Order Recursion Schemes}},
  booktitle =	{Computer Science Logic 2013 (CSL 2013)},
  pages =	{129--148},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-60-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{23},
  editor =	{Ronchi Della Rocca, Simona},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2013.129},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-41941},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2013.129},
  annote =	{Keywords: Model checking, higher-order recursion schemes, intersection types}
}
Document
On Bisimilarity of Higher-Order Pushdown Automata: Undecidability at Order Two

Authors: Christopher Broadbent and Stefan Göller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 18, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012)


Abstract
We show that bisimulation equivalence of order-two pushdown automata is undecidable. Moreover, we study the lower order problem of higher-order pushdown automata, which asks, given an order-k pushdown automaton and some k'<k, to determine if there exists a reachable configuration that is bisimilar to some order-k' pushdown automaton. We show that the lower order problem is undecidable for each k >= 2 even when the input k-PDA is deterministic and real-time.

Cite as

Christopher Broadbent and Stefan Göller. On Bisimilarity of Higher-Order Pushdown Automata: Undecidability at Order Two. In IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 18, pp. 160-172, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{broadbent_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.160,
  author =	{Broadbent, Christopher and G\"{o}ller, Stefan},
  title =	{{On Bisimilarity of Higher-Order Pushdown Automata: Undecidability at Order Two}},
  booktitle =	{IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012)},
  pages =	{160--172},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-47-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{18},
  editor =	{D'Souza, Deepak and Radhakrishnan, Jaikumar and Telikepalli, Kavitha},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.160},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-38583},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.160},
  annote =	{Keywords: Bisimulation equivalence, Higher-order pushdown automata}
}
Document
The Limits of Decidability for First Order Logic on CPDA Graphs

Authors: Christopher H. Broadbent

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 14, 29th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2012)


Abstract
Higher-order pushdown automata (n-PDA) are abstract machines equipped with a nested 'stack of stacks of stacks'. Collapsible pushdown automata (n-CPDA) extend these devices by adding `links' to the stack and are equi-expressive for tree generation with simply typed lambda-Y terms. Whilst the configuration graphs of HOPDA are well understood, relatively little is known about the CPDA graphs. The order-2 CPDA graphs already have undecidable MSO theories but it was only recently shown by Kartzow [Kartzow 2010] that first-order logic is decidable at the second level. In this paper we show the surprising result that first-order logic ceases to be decidable at order-3 and above. We delimit the fragments of the decision problem to which our undecidability result applies in terms of quantifer alternation and the orders of CPDA links used. Additionally we exhibit a natural sub-hierarchy enjoying limited decidability.

Cite as

Christopher H. Broadbent. The Limits of Decidability for First Order Logic on CPDA Graphs. In 29th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2012). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 14, pp. 589-600, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{broadbent:LIPIcs.STACS.2012.589,
  author =	{Broadbent, Christopher H.},
  title =	{{The Limits of Decidability for First Order Logic on CPDA Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2012)},
  pages =	{589--600},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-35-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{14},
  editor =	{D\"{u}rr, Christoph and Wilke, Thomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2012.589},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-34334},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2012.589},
  annote =	{Keywords: Collapsible Pushdown Automata, First Order Logic, Logical Reflection}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Broadbent, Christopher
  • 1 Arnon-Friedman, Rotem
  • 1 Broadbent, Christopher H.
  • 1 Fefferman, Bill
  • 1 Göller, Stefan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Bisimulation equivalence
  • 1 Collapsible Pushdown Automata
  • 1 First Order Logic
  • 1 Higher-order pushdown automata
  • 1 Logical Reflection
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 5 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2012
  • 2 2016
  • 1 2013

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail