2 Search Results for "Dodds, Mike"

Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2022.2
Concurrent Separation Logics: Logical Abstraction, Logical Atomicity and Environment Liveness Conditions (Invited Talk)

Authors: Philippa Gardner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 243, 33rd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2022)

Abstract
Scalable verification for concurrent programs with shared memory is a long-standing, difficult problem. In 2004, O'Hearn and Brookes introduced concurrent separation logic to provide compositional reasoning about coarse-grained concurrent programs with synchronisation primitives (Gödel prize, 2016). In 2010, I introduced logical abstraction (the fiction of separation) to CSL, developing the CAP logic for reasoning about fine-grained concurrent programs in general and fine-grained lock algorithms in particular. In one logic, it was possible to provide two-sided specifications of concurrent operations, with formally verified implementations and clients. In 2014, I introduced logical atomicity (the fiction of atomicity) to concurrent separation logics, developing the TaDA logic to capture when individual operations behave atomically. Unlike CAP, where synchronisation primitives leak into the specifications, with TaDA the specifications are "just right" in that they provide more general atomic functions specifications to capture, for example, the full behaviour of lock operations. In 2021, I introduced environment liveness conditions to concurrent separation logics, developing the TaDA Live logic for reasoning compositionally about the termination of blocking fine-grained concurrent programs. The crucial challenge is how to deal with abstract atomic blocking: that is, abstract atomic operations that have blocking behaviour arising from busy-waiting patterns as found in, for example, fine-grained spin locks. The fundamental innovation is with the design of abstract specifications that capture this blocking behaviour as liveness assumptions on the environment. In this talk, I will explain this on-going journey in the wonderful world of concurrent separation logics. I will also explain why I have a bright green office chair in the corner of my office, patterned in gold lamé. Many thanks to my fabulous coauthors on concurrent separation logics: Thomas Dinsdale-Young, Emanuele D'Osualdo, Mike Dodds, Azadeh Farzan, Matthew Parkinson, Pedro da Rocha Pinto, Julian Sutherland, Viktor Vafeiadis and more. Suggested Reading: - Peter O'Hearn: Resources, Concurrency and Local Reasoning, Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, Festschrift for John C Reynolds 70th birthday, 2007. - Thomas Dinsdale-Young, Pedro da Rocha Pinto and Philippa Gardner: A Perspective on Specifying and Verifying Concurrent Modules, Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 2018. - Emanuele D'Osualdo, Azadeh Farzan, Philippa Gardner and Julian Sutherland: TaDA Live: Compositional Reasoning for Termination of Fine-grained Concurrent Programs, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 2021.
Cite as

Philippa Gardner. Concurrent Separation Logics: Logical Abstraction, Logical Atomicity and Environment Liveness Conditions (Invited Talk). In 33rd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 243, p. 2:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gardner:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2022.2,
  author =	{Gardner, Philippa},
  title =	{{Concurrent Separation Logics: Logical Abstraction, Logical Atomicity and Environment Liveness Conditions}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2022)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-246-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{243},
  editor =	{Klin, Bartek and Lasota, S{\l}awomir and Muscholl, Anca},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2022.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-170659},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2022.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Concurrent separation logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2020.9
On the Formal Verification of the Stellar Consensus Protocol

Authors: Giuliano Losa and Mike Dodds

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 84, 2nd Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2020)

Abstract
The Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP) is a quorum-based BFT consensus protocol. However, instead of using threshold-based quorums, SCP is permissionless and its quorum system emerges from participants’ self-declared trust relationships. In this paper, we describe the methodology we deploy to formally verify the safety and liveness of SCP for arbitrary but fixed configurations. The proof uses a combination of Ivy and Isabelle/HOL. In Ivy, we model SCP in first-order logic, and we verify safety and liveness under eventual synchrony. In Isabelle/HOL, we prove the validity of our first-order encoding with respect to a more direct higher-order model. SCP is currently deployed in the Stellar Network, and we believe this is the first mechanized proof of both safety and liveness, specified in LTL, for a deployed BFT protocol.
Cite as

Giuliano Losa and Mike Dodds. On the Formal Verification of the Stellar Consensus Protocol. In 2nd Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2020). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 84, pp. 9:1-9:9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{losa_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2020.9,
  author =	{Losa, Giuliano and Dodds, Mike},
  title =	{{On the Formal Verification of the Stellar Consensus Protocol}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2020)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:9},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-169-6},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{84},
  editor =	{Bernardo, Bruno and Marmsoler, Diego},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2020.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-134226},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2020.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Consensus, Blockchains, First-Order Logic, Stellar, Ivy Prover, Decidability}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Dodds, Mike
  • 1 Gardner, Philippa
  • 1 Losa, Giuliano

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Networks → Protocol testing and verification
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Software verification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Concurrency

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Blockchains
  • 1 Concurrent separation logic
  • 1 Consensus
  • 1 Decidability
  • 1 First-Order Logic
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 2 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2022

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact