43 Search Results for "Fatourou, Panagiota"


Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 70

20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)

OPODIS 2016, December 13-16, 2016, Madrid, Spain

Editors: Panagiota Fatourou, Ernesto Jiménez, and Fernando Pedone

Document
Invited Talk
Recoverable Computing (Invited Talk)

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 253, 26th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2022)


Abstract
Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) is an emerging memory technology which aims to address the high computational demands of modern applications and support recovery from crashes. Recovery ensures that after a crash every executed operation is able to recover and return a correct response. This talk will shed light on different aspects of the question "How does concurrent computing change in systems with NVM and what will the impact of persistent memory be on the way we compute?". Specifically, this talk addresses the following four main challenges in NVM computing. - Challenge 1: How to appropriately model and abstract fundamental aspects of NVM computing? The talk will provide an overview of the theoretical framework for NVM computing, including a discussion of correctness conditions, progress guarantees, failure types, etc. - Challenge 2: How to compute in a recoverable way at no significant cost? The talk will summarize state-of-the-art generic approaches for deriving recoverable synchronization algorithms, as well as recoverable implementations of many widely-used concurrent data structures on top of them. The collection of data structures includes fundamental structures, such as stacks and queues, but also more complex structures that implement sets, such as linked-lists and trees. - Challenge 3: How to analyze the cost of recoverable algorithms? The talk will present a way of analyzing the cost of persistence instructions, not by simply counting them but by separating them into categories based on the impact they have on the performance. This analysis reveals that understanding the actual persistence cost of an algorithm in machines with NVM, is more complicated than previously thought, and requires a thorough evaluation, since the performance impact of different persistence instructions may greatly vary. - Challenge 4: When is Recoverable Consensus Harder Than Consensus? The talk will briefly discuss the ability of different shared object types to solve recoverable consensus using NVM when processes crash and recover, and it will compare the difficulty of solving recoverable consensus to the difficulty of solving the standard consensus problem in a system with halting failures. For each of the above challenges, the talk will present main results, provide some of the details of the best-performing techniques, and discuss open problems and directions for further research. Some of the results that will be discussed in detail have appeared in [Attiya et al., 2022; Delporte-Gallet et al., 2022; Fatourou et al., 2022].

Cite as

Panagiota Fatourou. Recoverable Computing (Invited Talk). In 26th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 253, pp. 2:1-2:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fatourou:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2022.2,
  author =	{Fatourou, Panagiota},
  title =	{{Recoverable Computing}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2022)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-265-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{253},
  editor =	{Hillel, Eshcar and Palmieri, Roberto and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2022.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-176221},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2022.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: non-volatile memory, persistence, detectability, durability, recoverable algorithms, recoverable data structures, persistent objects, stacks, queues, heaps, synchronization, universal constructions, software combining, lock-freedom, wait-freedom, persistence cost analysis}
}
Document
Space and Time Bounded Multiversion Garbage Collection

Authors: Naama Ben-David, Guy E. Blelloch, Panagiota Fatourou, Eric Ruppert, Yihan Sun, and Yuanhao Wei

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 209, 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021)


Abstract
We present a general technique for garbage collecting old versions for multiversion concurrency control that simultaneously achieves good time and space complexity. Our technique takes only O(1) time on average to reclaim each version and maintains only a constant factor more versions than needed (plus an additive term). It is designed for multiversion schemes using version lists, which are the most common. Our approach uses two components that are of independent interest. First, we define a novel range-tracking data structure which stores a set of old versions and efficiently finds those that are no longer needed. We provide a wait-free implementation in which all operations take amortized constant time. Second, we represent version lists using a new lock-free doubly-linked list algorithm that supports efficient (amortized constant time) removals given a pointer to any node in the list. These two components naturally fit together to solve the multiversion garbage collection problem - the range-tracker identifies which versions to remove and our list algorithm can then be used to remove them from their version lists. We apply our garbage collection technique to generate end-to-end time and space bounds for the multiversioning system of Wei et al. (PPoPP 2021).

Cite as

Naama Ben-David, Guy E. Blelloch, Panagiota Fatourou, Eric Ruppert, Yihan Sun, and Yuanhao Wei. Space and Time Bounded Multiversion Garbage Collection. In 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 209, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bendavid_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2021.12,
  author =	{Ben-David, Naama and Blelloch, Guy E. and Fatourou, Panagiota and Ruppert, Eric and Sun, Yihan and Wei, Yuanhao},
  title =	{{Space and Time Bounded Multiversion Garbage Collection}},
  booktitle =	{35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-210-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{209},
  editor =	{Gilbert, Seth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-148143},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lock-free, data structures, memory management, snapshot, version lists}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
Brief Announcement: Persistent Software Combining

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou, Nikolaos D. Kallimanis, and Eleftherios Kosmas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 209, 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021)


Abstract
We study the performance power of software combining in designing recoverable algorithms and data structures. We present two recoverable synchronization protocols, one blocking and another wait-free, which illustrate how to use software combining to achieve both low persistence and synchronization cost. Our experiments show that these protocols outperform by far state-of-the-art recoverable universal constructions and transactional memory systems. We built recoverable queues and stacks, based on these protocols, that exhibit much better performance than previous such implementations.

Cite as

Panagiota Fatourou, Nikolaos D. Kallimanis, and Eleftherios Kosmas. Brief Announcement: Persistent Software Combining. In 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 209, pp. 56:1-56:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fatourou_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2021.56,
  author =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Kallimanis, Nikolaos D. and Kosmas, Eleftherios},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Persistent Software Combining}},
  booktitle =	{35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-210-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{209},
  editor =	{Gilbert, Seth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-148580},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2021.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: Persistent objects, recoverable algorithms, durability, synchronization protocols, software combining, universal constructions, wait-freedom, stacks, queues}
}
Document
An Efficient Universal Construction for Large Objects

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou, Nikolaos D. Kallimanis, and Eleni Kanellou

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 153, 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)


Abstract
This paper presents L-UC, a universal construction that efficiently implements dynamic objects of large state in a wait-free manner. The step complexity of L-UC is O(n+kw), where n is the number of processes, k is the interval contention (i.e., the maximum number of active processes during the execution interval of an operation), and w is the worst-case time complexity to perform an operation on the sequential implementation of the simulated object. L-UC efficiently implements objects whose size can change dynamically. It improves upon previous universal constructions either by efficiently handling objects whose state is large and can change dynamically, or by achieving better step complexity.

Cite as

Panagiota Fatourou, Nikolaos D. Kallimanis, and Eleni Kanellou. An Efficient Universal Construction for Large Objects. In 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 153, pp. 18:1-18:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fatourou_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.18,
  author =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Kallimanis, Nikolaos D. and Kanellou, Eleni},
  title =	{{An Efficient Universal Construction for Large Objects}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-133-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{153},
  editor =	{Felber, Pascal and Friedman, Roy and Gilbert, Seth and Miller, Avery},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-118049},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: universal construction, concurrent object, shared memory, simulation, wait-freedom, large object}
}
Document
Lock Oscillation: Boosting the Performance of Concurrent Data Structures

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou and Nikolaos D. Kallimanis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 95, 21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017)


Abstract
In combining-based synchronization, two main parameters that affect performance are the com- bining degree of the synchronization algorithm, i.e. the average number of requests that each com- biner serves, and the number of expensive synchronization primitives (like CAS, Swap, etc.) that it performs. The value of the first parameter must be high, whereas the second must be kept low. In this paper, we present Osci, a new combining technique that shows remarkable perform- ance when paired with cheap context switching. We experimentally show that Osci significantly outperforms all previous combining algorithms. Specifically, the throughput of Osci is higher than that of previously presented combining techniques by more than an order of magnitude. Notably, Osci’s throughput is much closer to the ideal than all previous algorithms, while keep- ing the average latency in serving each request low. We evaluated the performance of Osci in two different multiprocessor architectures, namely AMD and Intel. Based on Osci, we implement and experimentally evaluate implementations of concurrent queues and stacks. These implementations outperform by far all current state-of-the-art concur- rent queue and stack implementations. Although the current version of Osci has been evaluated in an environment supporting user-level threads, it would run correctly on any threading library, preemptive or not (including kernel threads).

Cite as

Panagiota Fatourou and Nikolaos D. Kallimanis. Lock Oscillation: Boosting the Performance of Concurrent Data Structures. In 21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 95, pp. 8:1-8:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fatourou_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.8,
  author =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Kallimanis, Nikolaos D.},
  title =	{{Lock Oscillation: Boosting the Performance of Concurrent Data Structures}},
  booktitle =	{21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-061-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{95},
  editor =	{Aspnes, James and Bessani, Alysson and Felber, Pascal and Leit\~{a}o, Jo\~{a}o},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-86282},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Synchronization, concurrent data structures, combining}
}
Document
Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 70, OPODIS'16, Complete Volume

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou, Ernesto Jiménez, and Fernando Pedone

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 70, OPODIS'16, Complete Volume

Cite as

20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{fatourou_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 70, OPODIS'16, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-71111},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed Systems, Performance of Systems, Concurrent Programming, Data Structures, Modes of Computation}
}
Document
Front Matter
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Committees, List of Authors

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou, Ernesto Jiménez, and Fernando Pedone

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Committees, List of Authors

Cite as

20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, pp. 0:i-0:xviii, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fatourou_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.0,
  author =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Committees, List of Authors}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xviii},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70699},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Committees, List of Authors}
}
Document
Keynote Abstract
High Throughput Connectomics (Keynote Abstract)

Authors: Nir Shavit

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
Connectomics is an emerging field of neurobiology that uses cutting edge machine learning and image processing to extract brain connectivity graphs from electron microscopy images. It has long been assumed that the processing of connectomics data will require mass storage and farms of CPUs and GPUs and will take months if not years. This talk will discuss the feasibility of designing a high-throughput connectomics-on-demand system that runs on a multicore machine with less than 100 cores and extracts connectomes at the terabyte per hour pace of modern electron microscopes. Building this system required solving algorithmic and performance engineering issues related to scaling machine learning on multicore architectures, and may have important lessons for other problem spaces in the natural sciences, where until now large distributed server or GPU farms seemed to be the only way to go.

Cite as

Nir Shavit. High Throughput Connectomics (Keynote Abstract). In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, p. 1:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shavit:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.1,
  author =	{Shavit, Nir},
  title =	{{High Throughput Connectomics}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70705},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Machine learning, multicore architectures}
}
Document
Keynote Abstract
Blockchain - From the Anarchy of Cryptocurrencies to the Enterprise (Keynote Abstract)

Authors: Christian Cachin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
A blockchain is a public ledger for recording transactions, maintained by many nodes without central authority through a distributed cryptographic protocol. All nodes validate the information to be appended to the blockchain, and a consensus protocol ensures that the nodes agree on a unique order in which entries are appended. Distributed protocols tolerating faults and adversarial attacks, coupled with cryptographic tools are needed for this. The recent interest in blockchains has revived research on consensus protocols, ranging from the proof-of-work method in Bitcoin's "mining" protocol to classical Byzantine agreement. Going far beyond its use in cryptocurrencies, blockchain is today viewed as a promising technology to simplify trusted exchanges of data and goods among companies. In this context, the Hyperledger Project has been established in early 2016 as an industry-wide collaborative effort to develop an open-source blockchain. This talk will present an overview of blockchain concepts, cryptographic building blocks and consensus mechanisms. It will also introduce Hyperledger Fabric, an implementation of blockchain technology intended for enterprise applications. Being one of the key partners in the Hyperledger Project, IBM is actively involved in the development of this blockchain platform.

Cite as

Christian Cachin. Blockchain - From the Anarchy of Cryptocurrencies to the Enterprise (Keynote Abstract). In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, p. 2:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cachin:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.2,
  author =	{Cachin, Christian},
  title =	{{Blockchain - From the Anarchy of Cryptocurrencies to the Enterprise}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70719},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: consensus, cryptographic, distributed protocols}
}
Document
Keynote Abstract
Really Big Data: Analytics on Graphs with Trillions of Edges (Keynote Abstract)

Authors: Willy Zwaenepoel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
Big graphs occur naturally in many applications, most obviously in social networks, but also in many other areas such as biology and forensics. Current approaches to processing large graphs use either supercomputers or very large clusters. In both cases the entire graph must reside in memory before it can be processed. We are pursuing an alternative approach, processing graphs from secondary storage. While this comes with a performance penalty, it makes analytics on very large graphs feasible on a small number of commodity machines. We have developed two systems, one for a single machine and one for a cluster of machines. X-Stream, the single machine solution, aims to make all secondary storage access sequential. It uses two techniques to achieve this goal, edge-centric processing and streaming partitions. Chaos, the cluster solution, starts from the observation that there is little benefit to locality when accessing data from secondary storage over a high-speed network. As a result, Chaos spreads graph data uniformly randomly over storage devices, and uses randomized access to achieve I/O balance. Chaos furthermore uses work stealing to achieve computational load balance. By using these techniques, it avoids the need for expensive partitioning during pre-processing, while still achieving good scaling behavior. With Chaos we have been able to process an 8-trillion-edge graph on 32 machines, a new milestone for graph size on a small cluster. I will describe both systems and their performance on a number of benchmarks and in comparison to state-of-the-art alternatives. This is joint work with Laurent Bindschaedler (EPFL), Jasmina Malicevic (EPFL) and Amitabha Roy (Intel Labs).

Cite as

Willy Zwaenepoel. Really Big Data: Analytics on Graphs with Trillions of Edges (Keynote Abstract). In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, p. 3:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zwaenepoel:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.3,
  author =	{Zwaenepoel, Willy},
  title =	{{Really Big Data: Analytics on Graphs with Trillions of Edges}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70724},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: large graphs}
}
Document
Keynote Abstract
Participating Sets, Simulations, and the Consensus Hierarchy (Keynote Abstract)

Authors: Faith Ellen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
The participating set problem can be solved in an asynchronous system using only registers. I will gently explain this problem and its solution, followed by a new extension, called consistent ordered partition. Next, I will present a wait-free simulation by f + 1 processes of any setconsensus algorithm that tolerates f faults. I will also describe how to extend this simulation using consistent ordered partition. Finally, I will discuss how this extension can be used to prove that, within every level m > 1 of the consensus hierarchy, there is an infinite sequence of increasingly more powerful deterministic objects.

Cite as

Faith Ellen. Participating Sets, Simulations, and the Consensus Hierarchy (Keynote Abstract). In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, p. 4:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ellen:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.4,
  author =	{Ellen, Faith},
  title =	{{Participating Sets, Simulations, and the Consensus Hierarchy}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70736},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Consensus, shared-memory systems}
}
Document
Bounded Disagreement

Authors: David Yu Cheng Chan, Vassos Hadzilacos, and Sam Toueg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
A well-known generalization of the consensus problem, namely, set agreement (SA), limits the number of distinct decision values that processes decide. In some settings, it may be more important to limit the number of "disagreers". Thus, we introduce another natural generalization of the consensus problem, namely, bounded disagreement (BD), which limits the number of processes that decide differently from the plurality. More precisely, in a system with n processes, the (n, l)-BD task has the following requirement: there is a value v such that at most l processes (the disagreers) decide a value other than v. Despite their apparent similarities, the results described below show that bounded disagreement, consensus, and set agreement are in fact fundamentally different problems. We investigate the relationship between bounded disagreement, consensus, and set agreement. In particular, we determine the consensus number for every instance of the BD task. We also determine values of n, l, m, and k such that the (n, l)-BD task can solve the (m, k)-SA task (where m processes can decide at most k distinct values). Using our results and a previously known impossibility result for set agreement, we prove that for all n >= 2, there is a BD task (and a corresponding BD object) that has consensus number n but can not be solved using n-consensus and registers. Prior to our paper, the only objects known to have this unusual characteristic for n >= 2 (which shows that the consensus number of an object is not sufficient to fully capture its power) were artificial objects crafted solely for the purpose of exhibiting this behaviour.

Cite as

David Yu Cheng Chan, Vassos Hadzilacos, and Sam Toueg. Bounded Disagreement. In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, pp. 5:1-5:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yuchengchan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.5,
  author =	{Yu Cheng Chan, David and Hadzilacos, Vassos and Toueg, Sam},
  title =	{{Bounded Disagreement}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70742},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Consensus, Set Agreement, Asynchronous System, Distributed Algorithms, Shared Memory}
}
Document
Read-Write Memory and k-Set Consensus as an Affine Task

Authors: Eli Gafni, Yuan He, Petr Kuznetsov, and Thibault Rieutord

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
The wait-free read-write memory model has been characterized as an iterated Immediate Snapshot (IS) task. The IS task is affine — it can be defined as a (sub)set of simplices of the standard chromatic subdivision. In this paper, we highlight the phenomenon of a "natural" model that can be captured by an iterated affine task and, thus, by a subset of runs of the iterated immediate snapshot model. We show that the read-write memory model in which, additionally, k-set-consensus objects can be used is "natural" by presenting the corresponding simple affine task captured by a subset of 2-round IS runs. As an "unnatural" example, the model using the abstraction of Weak Symmetry Breaking (WSB) cannot be captured by a set of IS runs and, thus, cannot be represented as an affine task. Our results imply the first combinatorial characterization of models equipped with abstractions other than read-write memory that applies to generic tasks.

Cite as

Eli Gafni, Yuan He, Petr Kuznetsov, and Thibault Rieutord. Read-Write Memory and k-Set Consensus as an Affine Task. In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, pp. 6:1-6:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gafni_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.6,
  author =	{Gafni, Eli and He, Yuan and Kuznetsov, Petr and Rieutord, Thibault},
  title =	{{Read-Write Memory and k-Set Consensus as an Affine Task}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70759},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: iterated affine tasks, k-set consensus, k-concurrency, simplicial complexes, immediate snapshot}
}
Document
Set-Consensus Collections are Decidable

Authors: Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Eli Gafni, and Petr Kuznetsov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 70, 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)


Abstract
A natural way to measure the power of a distributed-computing model is to characterize the set of tasks that can be solved in it. In general, however, the question of whether a given task can be solved in a given model is undecidable, even if we only consider the wait-free shared-memory model. In this paper, we address this question for restricted classes of models and tasks. We show that the question of whether a collection C of (l, j)-set consensus objects, for various l (the number of processes that can invoke the object) and j (the number of distinct outputs the object returns), can be used by n processes to solve wait-free k-set consensus is decidable. Moreover, we provide a simple O(n^2) decision algorithm, based on a dynamic programming solution to the Knapsack optimization problem. We then present an adaptive wait-free set-consensus algorithm that, for each set of participating processes, achieves the best level of agreement that is possible to achieve using C. Overall, this gives us a complete characterization of a read-write model defined by a collection of set-consensus objects through its set-consensus power.

Cite as

Carole Delporte-Gallet, Hugues Fauconnier, Eli Gafni, and Petr Kuznetsov. Set-Consensus Collections are Decidable. In 20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 70, pp. 7:1-7:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{delportegallet_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.7,
  author =	{Delporte-Gallet, Carole and Fauconnier, Hugues and Gafni, Eli and Kuznetsov, Petr},
  title =	{{Set-Consensus Collections are Decidable}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-031-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{70},
  editor =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Jim\'{e}nez, Ernesto and Pedone, Fernando},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-70761},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Decidability, distributed tasks, set consensus, Knapsack problem}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 7 Fatourou, Panagiota
  • 3 Kallimanis, Nikolaos D.
  • 2 Cachin, Christian
  • 2 Gafni, Eli
  • 2 Jiménez, Ernesto
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Concurrent algorithms
  • 3 Theory of computation → Data structures design and analysis
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Concurrent algorithms
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Concurrent computing methodologies
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Shared memory algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Consensus
  • 3 shared memory
  • 3 wait-freedom
  • 2 Decidability
  • 2 Lock-free
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 42 document
  • 1 volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 38 2017
  • 2 2021
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2023

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail