4 Search Results for "Kamali, Shahin"


Document
Competitive Search in the Line and the Star with Predictions

Authors: Spyros Angelopoulos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 272, 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)


Abstract
We study the classic problem of searching for a hidden target in the line and the m-ray star, in a setting in which the searcher has some prediction on the hider’s position. We first focus on the main metric for comparing search strategies under predictions; namely, we give positive and negative results on the consistency-robustness tradeoff, where the performance of the strategy is evaluated at extreme situations in which the prediction is either error-free, or adversarially generated, respectively. For the line, we show tight bounds concerning this tradeoff, under the untrusted advice model, in which the prediction is in the form of a k-bit string which encodes the responses to k binary queries. For the star, we give tight, and near-tight tradeoffs in the positional and the directional models, in which the prediction is related to the position of the target within the star, and to the ray on which the target hides, respectively. Last, for all three prediction models, we show how to generalize our study to a setting in which the performance of the strategy is evaluated as a function of the searcher’s desired tolerance to prediction errors, both in terms of positive and inapproximability results.

Cite as

Spyros Angelopoulos. Competitive Search in the Line and the Star with Predictions. In 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 272, pp. 12:1-12:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{angelopoulos:LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.12,
  author =	{Angelopoulos, Spyros},
  title =	{{Competitive Search in the Line and the Star with Predictions}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-292-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{272},
  editor =	{Leroux, J\'{e}r\^{o}me and Lombardy, Sylvain and Peleg, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-185464},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Search problems, line and star search, competitive ratio, predictions, consistency and robustness}
}
Document
Rényi-Ulam Games and Online Computation with Imperfect Advice

Authors: Spyros Angelopoulos and Shahin Kamali

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 272, 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)


Abstract
We study the nascent setting of online computation with imperfect advice, in which the online algorithm is enhanced by some prediction encoded in the form of an imperfect, and possibly erroneous binary string. The algorithm is oblivious to the advice error, but defines a desired tolerance, namely an upper bound on the number of erroneous advice bits it can tolerate. This is a model that generalizes the Pareto-based advice model, in which the performance of the algorithm is only evaluated at the extreme values of error (namely, if the advice has either no errors, or if it is generated adversarially). It also subsumes the model in which the algorithm elicits a prediction on the online sequence, via imperfect responses to a number of binary queries. In this work, we establish connections between games with a lying responder, also known as Rényi-Ulam games, and the design and analysis of online algorithms with imperfect advice. Specifically, we demonstrate how to obtain upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio for important online problems such as time-series search, online bidding, and fractional knapsack. Our techniques provide the first lower bounds for online problems in this model. We also highlight and exploit connections between competitive analysis with imperfect advice and fault-tolerance in multiprocessor systems. Last, we show how to waive the dependence on the tolerance parameter, by means of resource augmentation and robustification.

Cite as

Spyros Angelopoulos and Shahin Kamali. Rényi-Ulam Games and Online Computation with Imperfect Advice. In 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 272, pp. 13:1-13:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{angelopoulos_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.13,
  author =	{Angelopoulos, Spyros and Kamali, Shahin},
  title =	{{R\'{e}nyi-Ulam Games and Online Computation with Imperfect Advice}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-292-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{272},
  editor =	{Leroux, J\'{e}r\^{o}me and Lombardy, Sylvain and Peleg, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-185474},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Online computation, R\'{e}nyi-Ulam games, query models, beyond worst-case analysis}
}
Document
Online Computation with Untrusted Advice

Authors: Spyros Angelopoulos, Christoph Dürr, Shendan Jin, Shahin Kamali, and Marc Renault

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 151, 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020)


Abstract
The advice model of online computation captures the setting in which the online algorithm is given some partial information concerning the request sequence. This paradigm allows to establish tradeoffs between the amount of this additional information and the performance of the online algorithm. However, unlike real life in which advice is a recommendation that we can choose to follow or to ignore based on trustworthiness, in the current advice model, the online algorithm treats it as infallible. This means that if the advice is corrupt or, worse, if it comes from a malicious source, the algorithm may perform poorly. In this work, we study online computation in a setting in which the advice is provided by an untrusted source. Our objective is to quantify the impact of untrusted advice so as to design and analyze online algorithms that are robust and perform well even when the advice is generated in a malicious, adversarial manner. To this end, we focus on well- studied online problems such as ski rental, online bidding, bin packing, and list update. For ski-rental and online bidding, we show how to obtain algorithms that are Pareto-optimal with respect to the competitive ratios achieved; this improves upon the framework of Purohit et al. [NeurIPS 2018] in which Pareto-optimality is not necessarily guaranteed. For bin packing and list update, we give online algorithms with worst-case tradeoffs in their competitiveness, depending on whether the advice is trusted or not; this is motivated by work of Lykouris and Vassilvitskii [ICML 2018] on the paging problem, but in which the competitiveness depends on the reliability of the advice. Furthermore, we demonstrate how to prove lower bounds, within this model, on the tradeoff between the number of advice bits and the competitiveness of any online algorithm. Last, we study the effect of randomization: here we show that for ski-rental there is a randomized algorithm that Pareto-dominates any deterministic algorithm with advice of any size. We also show that a single random bit is not always inferior to a single advice bit, as it happens in the standard model.

Cite as

Spyros Angelopoulos, Christoph Dürr, Shendan Jin, Shahin Kamali, and Marc Renault. Online Computation with Untrusted Advice. In 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 151, pp. 52:1-52:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{angelopoulos_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.52,
  author =	{Angelopoulos, Spyros and D\"{u}rr, Christoph and Jin, Shendan and Kamali, Shahin and Renault, Marc},
  title =	{{Online Computation with Untrusted Advice}},
  booktitle =	{11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020)},
  pages =	{52:1--52:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-134-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{151},
  editor =	{Vidick, Thomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.52},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-117372},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.52},
  annote =	{Keywords: Online computation, competitive analysis, advice complexity, robust algorithms, untrusted advice}
}
Document
Online Bin Packing with Advice

Authors: Joan Boyar, Shahin Kamali, Kim S. Larsen, and Alejandro López-Ortiz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 25, 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014)


Abstract
We consider the online bin packing problem under the advice complexity model where the "online constraint" is relaxed and an algorithm receives partial information about the future requests. We provide tight upper and lower bounds for the amount of advice an algorithm needs to achieve an optimal packing. We also introduce an algorithm that, when provided with log(n)+o(log(n)) bits of advice, achieves a competitive ratio of 3/2 for the general problem. This algorithm is simple and is expected to find real-world applications. We introduce another algorithm that receives 2n+o(n) bits of advice and achieves a competitive ratio of 4/3+e. Finally, we provide a lower bound argument that implies that advice of linear size is required for an algorithm to achieve a competitive ratio better than 9/8.

Cite as

Joan Boyar, Shahin Kamali, Kim S. Larsen, and Alejandro López-Ortiz. Online Bin Packing with Advice. In 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 25, pp. 174-186, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2014)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan and Kamali, Shahin and Larsen, Kim S. and L\'{o}pez-Ortiz, Alejandro},
  title =	{{Online Bin Packing with Advice}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014)},
  pages =	{174--186},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-65-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2014},
  volume =	{25},
  editor =	{Mayr, Ernst W. and Portier, Natacha},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-44565},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174},
  annote =	{Keywords: online algorithms, advice complexity, bin packing}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Angelopoulos, Spyros
  • 3 Kamali, Shahin
  • 1 Boyar, Joan
  • 1 Dürr, Christoph
  • 1 Jin, Shendan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Online algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Theory and algorithms for application domains

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Online computation
  • 2 advice complexity
  • 1 Rényi-Ulam games
  • 1 Search problems
  • 1 beyond worst-case analysis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 4 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2023
  • 1 2014
  • 1 2020

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail