4 Search Results for "Møgelberg, Rasmus Ejlers"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.39
What Monads Can and Cannot Do with a Bit of Extra Time

Authors: Rasmus Ejlers Møgelberg and Maaike Annebet Zwart

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)

Abstract
The delay monad provides a way to introduce general recursion in type theory. To write programs that use a wide range of computational effects directly in type theory, we need to combine the delay monad with the monads of these effects. Here we present a first systematic study of such combinations. We study both the coinductive delay monad and its guarded recursive cousin, giving concrete examples of combining these with well-known computational effects. We also provide general theorems stating which algebraic effects distribute over the delay monad, and which do not. Lastly, we salvage some of the impossible cases by considering distributive laws up to weak bisimilarity.
Cite as

Rasmus Ejlers Møgelberg and Maaike Annebet Zwart. What Monads Can and Cannot Do with a Bit of Extra Time. In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 39:1-39:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mgelberg_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.39,
  author =	{M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers and Zwart, Maaike Annebet},
  title =	{{What Monads Can and Cannot Do with a Bit of Extra Time}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196823},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Delay Monad, Monad Compositions, Distributive Laws, Guarded Recursion, Type Theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2022.14
Realising Intensional S4 and GL Modalities

Authors: Liang-Ting Chen and Hsiang-Shang Ko

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 216, 30th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2022)

Abstract
There have been investigations into type-theoretic foundations for metaprogramming, notably Davies and Pfenning’s (2001) treatment in S4 modal logic, where code evaluating to values of type A is given the modal type Code A (□A in the original paper). Recently Kavvos (2017) extended PCF with Code A and intensional recursion, understood as the deductive form of the GL (Gödel-Löb) axiom in provability logic, but the resulting type system is logically inconsistent. Inspired by staged computation, we observe that a term of type Code A is, in general, code to be evaluated in a next stage, whereas S4 modal type theory is a special case where code can be evaluated in the current stage, and the two types of code should be discriminated. Consequently, we use two separate modalities ⊠ and □ to model S4 and GL respectively in a unified categorical framework while retaining logical consistency. Following Kavvos’ (2017) novel approach to the semantics of intensionality, we interpret the two modalities in the P-category of assemblies and trackable maps. For the GL modality □ in particular, we use guarded type theory to articulate what it means by a “next” stage and to model intensional recursion by guarded recursion together with Kleene’s second recursion theorem. Besides validating the S4 and GL axioms, our model better captures the essence of intensionality by refuting congruence (so that two extensionally equal terms may not be intensionally equal) and internal quoting (both A → □A and A → ⊠A). Our results are developed in (guarded) homotopy type theory and formalised in Agda.
Cite as

Liang-Ting Chen and Hsiang-Shang Ko. Realising Intensional S4 and GL Modalities. In 30th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 216, pp. 14:1-14:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2022.14,
  author =	{Chen, Liang-Ting and Ko, Hsiang-Shang},
  title =	{{Realising Intensional S4 and GL Modalities}},
  booktitle =	{30th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2022)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-218-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{216},
  editor =	{Manea, Florin and Simpson, Alex},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2022.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-157341},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2022.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: provability, guarded recursion, realisability, modal types, metaprogramming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.32
Guarded Recursion in Agda via Sized Types

Authors: Niccolò Veltri and Niels van der Weide

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 131, 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)

Abstract
In type theory, programming and reasoning with possibly non-terminating programs and potentially infinite objects is achieved using coinductive types. Recursively defined programs of these types need to be productive to guarantee the consistency of the type system. Proof assistants such as Agda and Coq traditionally employ strict syntactic productivity checks, which often make programming with coinductive types convoluted. One way to overcome this issue is by encoding productivity at the level of types so that the type system forbids the implementation of non-productive corecursive programs. In this paper we compare two different approaches to type-based productivity: guarded recursion and sized types. More specifically, we show how to simulate guarded recursion in Agda using sized types. We formalize the syntax of a simple type theory for guarded recursion, which is a variant of Atkey and McBride’s calculus for productive coprogramming. Then we give a denotational semantics using presheaves over the preorder of sizes. Sized types are fundamentally used to interpret the characteristic features of guarded recursion, notably the fixpoint combinator.
Cite as

Niccolò Veltri and Niels van der Weide. Guarded Recursion in Agda via Sized Types. In 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 131, pp. 32:1-32:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{veltri_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.32,
  author =	{Veltri, Niccol\`{o} and van der Weide, Niels},
  title =	{{Guarded Recursion in Agda via Sized Types}},
  booktitle =	{4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-107-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{131},
  editor =	{Geuvers, Herman},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-105391},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: guarded recursion, type theory, semantics, coinduction, sized types}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2018.23
The Clocks They Are Adjunctions Denotational Semantics for Clocked Type Theory

Authors: Bassel Mannaa and Rasmus Ejlers Møgelberg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 108, 3rd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2018)

Abstract
Clocked Type Theory (CloTT) is a type theory for guarded recursion useful for programming with coinductive types, allowing productivity to be encoded in types, and for reasoning about advanced programming language features using an abstract form of step-indexing. CloTT has previously been shown to enjoy a number of syntactic properties including strong normalisation, canonicity and decidability of type checking. In this paper we present a denotational semantics for CloTT useful, e.g., for studying future extensions of CloTT with constructions such as path types. The main challenge for constructing this model is to model the notion of ticks used in CloTT for coinductive reasoning about coinductive types. We build on a category previously used to model guarded recursion, but in this category there is no object of ticks, so tick-assumptions in a context can not be modelled using standard tools. Instead we show how ticks can be modelled using adjoint functors, and how to model the tick constant using a semantic substitution.
Cite as

Bassel Mannaa and Rasmus Ejlers Møgelberg. The Clocks They Are Adjunctions Denotational Semantics for Clocked Type Theory. In 3rd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 108, pp. 23:1-23:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mannaa_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2018.23,
  author =	{Mannaa, Bassel and M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers},
  title =	{{The Clocks They Are Adjunctions Denotational Semantics for Clocked Type Theory}},
  booktitle =	{3rd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2018)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-077-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{108},
  editor =	{Kirchner, H\'{e}l\`{e}ne},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2018.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-91938},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2018.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Guarded type theory, Coinduction, Presheaf model, Clocked type theory, Dependent adjunction}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Møgelberg, Rasmus Ejlers
  • 1 Chen, Liang-Ting
  • 1 Ko, Hsiang-Shang
  • 1 Mannaa, Bassel
  • 1 Veltri, Niccolò
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Type theory
  • 2 Theory of computation → Categorical semantics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Program semantics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Type structures

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 guarded recursion
  • 1 Clocked type theory
  • 1 Coinduction
  • 1 Delay Monad
  • 1 Dependent adjunction
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 4 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2019
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2024

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact