17 Search Results for "Montanari, Angelo"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2023.2
LTL over Finite Words Can Be Exponentially More Succinct Than Pure-Past LTL, and vice versa

Authors: Alessandro Artale, Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, Andrea Mazzullo, and Angelo Montanari

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 278, 30th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2023)

Abstract
Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTL_𝖿) has proved itself to be an important and effective formalism in formal verification as well as in artificial intelligence. Pure past LTL_𝖿 (pLTL) is the logic obtained from LTL_𝖿 by replacing each (future) temporal operator by a corresponding past one, and is naturally interpreted at the end of a finite trace. It is known that each property definable in LTL_𝖿 is also definable in pLTL, and ǐceversa. However, despite being extensively used in practice, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic study of their succinctness. In this paper, we investigate the succinctness of LTL_𝖿 and pLTL. First, we prove that pLTL can be exponentially more succinct than LTL_𝖿 by showing that there exists a property definable with a pLTL formula of size n such that the size of all LTL_𝖿 formulas defining it is at least exponential in n. Then, we prove that LTL_𝖿 can be exponentially more succinct than pLTL as well. This result shows that, although being expressively equivalent, LTL_𝖿 and pLTL are incomparable when succinctness is concerned. In addition, we study the succinctness of Safety-LTL (the syntactic safety fragment of LTL over infinite traces) with respect to its canonical form G(pLTL), whose formulas are of the form G(α), G being the globally operator and α a pLTL formula. We prove that G(pLTL) can be exponentially more succinct than Safety-LTL, and that the same holds for the dual cosafety fragment.
Cite as

Alessandro Artale, Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, Andrea Mazzullo, and Angelo Montanari. LTL over Finite Words Can Be Exponentially More Succinct Than Pure-Past LTL, and vice versa. In 30th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 278, pp. 2:1-2:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{artale_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2023.2,
  author =	{Artale, Alessandro and Geatti, Luca and Gigante, Nicola and Mazzullo, Andrea and Montanari, Angelo},
  title =	{{LTL over Finite Words Can Be Exponentially More Succinct Than Pure-Past LTL, and vice versa}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-298-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{278},
  editor =	{Artikis, Alexander and Bruse, Florian and Hunsberger, Luke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-190927},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Temporal Logic, Succinctness, LTLf, Finite Traces, Pure past LTL}
}
Document
Extended Abstract
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2023.22
Qualitative past Timeline-Based Games (Extended Abstract)

Authors: Renato Acampora, Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, and Angelo Montanari

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 278, 30th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2023)

Abstract
This extended abstract discusses timeline-based planning, a modeling approach that offers a unique way to model complex systems. Recently, the timeline-based planning framework has been extended to handle general nondeterminism in a game-theoretic setting, resulting in timeline-based games. In this context, the problem of establishing whether a timeline-based game admits a winning strategy and synthesizing such a strategy have been addressed. We propose exploring simpler yet expressive fragments of timeline-based games by leveraging results about the role of past operators in synthesis from temporal logic specifications. The qualitative fragment of timeline-based planning is a good starting point for this exploration. We suggest introducing syntactic restrictions on synchronization rules so that they only constrain the behavior of the system before the current time point, which is expected to lower the complexity of synthesizing timeline-based games to EXPTIME.
Cite as

Renato Acampora, Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, and Angelo Montanari. Qualitative past Timeline-Based Games (Extended Abstract). In 30th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 278, pp. 22:1-22:3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{acampora_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2023.22,
  author =	{Acampora, Renato and Geatti, Luca and Gigante, Nicola and Montanari, Angelo},
  title =	{{Qualitative past Timeline-Based Games}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2023)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:3},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-298-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{278},
  editor =	{Artikis, Alexander and Bruse, Florian and Hunsberger, Luke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2023.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-191125},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2023.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automata, Planning, Temporal Reasoning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.8
Past Matters: Supporting LTL+Past in the BLACK Satisfiability Checker

Authors: Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, Angelo Montanari, and Gabriele Venturato

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 206, 28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021)

Abstract
LTL+Past is the extension of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) supporting past temporal operators. The addition of the past does not add expressive power, but does increase the usability of the language both in formal verification and in artificial intelligence, e.g., in the context of multi-agent systems. In this paper, we add the support of past operators to BLACK, a satisfiability checker for LTL based on a SAT encoding of a tree-shaped tableau system. We implement two ways of supporting the past in the tool. The first one is an equisatisfiable translation that removes the past operators, obtaining a future-only formula that can be solved with the original LTL engine. The second one extends the SAT encoding of the underlying tableau to directly support the tableau rules that deal with past operators. We describe both approaches and experimentally compare the two between themselves and with the νXmv model checker, obtaining promising results.
Cite as

Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, Angelo Montanari, and Gabriele Venturato. Past Matters: Supporting LTL+Past in the BLACK Satisfiability Checker. In 28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 206, pp. 8:1-8:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{geatti_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2021.8,
  author =	{Geatti, Luca and Gigante, Nicola and Montanari, Angelo and Venturato, Gabriele},
  title =	{{Past Matters: Supporting LTL+Past in the BLACK Satisfiability Checker}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-206-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{206},
  editor =	{Combi, Carlo and Eder, Johann and Reynolds, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-147846},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, LTL, LTL+Past, Tableaux}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.9
Pspace-Completeness of the Temporal Logic of Sub-Intervals and Suffixes

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 206, 28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021)

Abstract
In this paper, we establish Pspace-completeness of the finite satisfiability and model checking problems for the fragment of Halpern and Shoham interval logic with modality ⟨E⟩, for the "suffix" relation on pairs of intervals, and modality ⟨D⟩, for the "sub-interval" relation, under the homogeneity assumption. The result significantly improves the Expspace upper bound recently established for the same fragment, and proves the rather surprising fact that the complexity of the considered problems does not change when we add either the modality for suffixes (⟨E⟩) or, symmetrically, the modality for prefixes (⟨B⟩) to the logic of sub-intervals (featuring only ⟨D⟩).
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala. Pspace-Completeness of the Temporal Logic of Sub-Intervals and Suffixes. In 28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 206, pp. 9:1-9:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2021.9,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano and Sala, Pietro},
  title =	{{Pspace-Completeness of the Temporal Logic of Sub-Intervals and Suffixes}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-206-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{206},
  editor =	{Combi, Carlo and Eder, Johann and Reynolds, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-147853},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interval temporal logic, Satisfiability, Model checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16
Complexity of Qualitative Timeline-Based Planning

Authors: Dario Della Monica, Nicola Gigante, Salvatore La Torre, and Angelo Montanari

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 178, 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)

Abstract
The timeline-based approach to automated planning was originally developed in the context of space missions. In this approach, problem domains are expressed as systems consisting of independent but interacting components whose behaviors over time, the timelines, are governed by a set of temporal constraints, called synchronization rules. Although timeline-based system descriptions have been successfully used in practice for decades, the research on the theoretical aspects only started recently. In the last few years, some interesting results have been shown concerning both its expressive power and the computational complexity of the related planning problem. In particular, the general problem has been proved to be EXPSPACE-complete. Given the applicability of the approach in many practical scenarios, it is thus natural to ask whether computationally simpler but still expressive fragments can be identified. In this paper, we study the timeline-based planning problem with the restriction that only qualitative synchronization rules, i.e., rules without explicit time bounds in the constraints, are allowed. We show that the problem becomes PSPACE-complete.
Cite as

Dario Della Monica, Nicola Gigante, Salvatore La Torre, and Angelo Montanari. Complexity of Qualitative Timeline-Based Planning. In 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 178, pp. 16:1-16:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dellamonica_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16,
  author =	{Della Monica, Dario and Gigante, Nicola and La Torre, Salvatore and Montanari, Angelo},
  title =	{{Complexity of Qualitative Timeline-Based Planning}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-167-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{178},
  editor =	{Mu\~{n}oz-Velasco, Emilio and Ozaki, Ana and Theobald, Martin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-129847},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Timeline-based planning, qualitative temporal constraints, complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.17
A Note on C² Interpreted over Finite Data-Words

Authors: Bartosz Bednarczyk and Piotr Witkowski

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 178, 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)

Abstract
We consider the satisfiability problem for the two-variable fragment of first-order logic extended with counting quantifiers, interpreted over finite words with data, denoted here with C²[≤ , succ, ∼, π_bin]. In our scenario, we allow for using arbitrary many uninterpreted binary predicates from π_bin, two navigational predicates ≤ and succ over word positions as well as a data-equality predicate ∼. We prove that the obtained logic is undecidable, which contrasts with the decidability of the logic without counting by Montanari, Pazzaglia and Sala [Angelo Montanari et al., 2016]. We supplement our results with decidability for several sub-fragments of C²[≤ , succ, ∼, π_bin], e.g. without binary predicates, without successor succ, or under the assumption that the total number of positions carrying the same data value in a data-word is bounded by an a priori given constant.
Cite as

Bartosz Bednarczyk and Piotr Witkowski. A Note on C² Interpreted over Finite Data-Words. In 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 178, pp. 17:1-17:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bednarczyk_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2020.17,
  author =	{Bednarczyk, Bartosz and Witkowski, Piotr},
  title =	{{A Note on C² Interpreted over Finite Data-Words}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-167-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{178},
  editor =	{Mu\~{n}oz-Velasco, Emilio and Ozaki, Ana and Theobald, Martin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-129850},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Two-variable logic, data-words, VASS, decidability, undecidability, counting}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.21
On a Temporal Logic of Prefixes and Infixes

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 170, 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020)

Abstract
A classic result by Stockmeyer [Stockmeyer, 1974] gives a non-elementary lower bound to the emptiness problem for star-free generalized regular expressions. This result is intimately connected to the satisfiability problem for interval temporal logic, notably for formulas that make use of the so-called chop operator. Such an operator can indeed be interpreted as the inverse of the concatenation operation on regular languages, and this correspondence enables reductions between non-emptiness of star-free generalized regular expressions and satisfiability of formulas of the interval temporal logic of the chop operator under the homogeneity assumption [Halpern et al., 1983]. In this paper, we study the complexity of the satisfiability problem for a suitable weakening of the chop interval temporal logic, that can be equivalently viewed as a fragment of Halpern and Shoham interval logic featuring the operators B, for "begins", corresponding to the prefix relation on pairs of intervals, and D, for "during", corresponding to the infix relation. The homogeneous models of the considered logic naturally correspond to languages defined by restricted forms of regular expressions, that use union, complementation, and the inverses of the prefix and infix relations.
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala. On a Temporal Logic of Prefixes and Infixes. In 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 170, pp. 21:1-21:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.21,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano and Sala, Pietro},
  title =	{{On a Temporal Logic of Prefixes and Infixes}},
  booktitle =	{45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-159-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{170},
  editor =	{Esparza, Javier and Kr\'{a}l', Daniel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-126898},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interval Temporal Logic, Star-Free Regular Languages, Satisfiability, Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.33
Interval Temporal Logic for Visibly Pushdown Systems

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, and Adriano Peron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 150, 39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019)

Abstract
In this paper, we introduce and investigate an extension of Halpern and Shoham’s interval temporal logic HS for the specification and verification of branching-time context-free requirements of pushdown systems under a state-based semantics over Kripke structures. Both homogeneity and visibility are assumed. The proposed logic, called nested BHS, supports branching-time both in the past and in the future, and is able to express non-regular properties of linear and branching behaviours of procedural contexts in a natural way. It strictly subsumes well-known linear time context-free extensions of LTL such as CaRet [R. Alur et al., 2004] and NWTL [R. Alur et al., 2007]. The main result is the decidability of the visibly pushdown model-checking problem against nested BHS. The proof exploits a non-trivial automata-theoretic construction.
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, and Adriano Peron. Interval Temporal Logic for Visibly Pushdown Systems. In 39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 150, pp. 33:1-33:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.33,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano},
  title =	{{Interval Temporal Logic for Visibly Pushdown Systems}},
  booktitle =	{39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-131-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{150},
  editor =	{Chattopadhyay, Arkadev and Gastin, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-115959},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pushdown systems, Interval temporal logic, Model checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.34
Taming the Complexity of Timeline-Based Planning over Dense Temporal Domains

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, and Adriano Peron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 150, 39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019)

Abstract
The problem of timeline-based planning (TP) over dense temporal domains is known to be undecidable. In this paper, we introduce two semantic variants of TP, called strong minimal and weak minimal semantics, which allow to express meaningful properties. Both semantics are based on the minimality in the time distances of the existentially-quantified time events from the universally-quantified reference event, but the weak minimal variant distinguishes minimality in the past from minimality in the future. Surprisingly, we show that, despite the (apparently) small difference in the two semantics, for the strong minimal one, the TP problem is still undecidable, while for the weak minimal one, the TP problem is just PSPACE-complete. Membership in PSPACE is determined by exploiting a strictly more expressive extension (ECA^+) of the well-known robust class of Event-Clock Automata (ECA) that allows to encode the weak minimal TP problem and to reduce it to non-emptiness of Timed Automata (TA). Finally, an extension of ECA^+ (ECA^{++}) is considered, proving that its non-emptiness problem is undecidable. We believe that the two extensions of ECA (ECA^+ and ECA^{++}), introduced for technical reasons, are actually valuable per sé in the field of TA.
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, and Adriano Peron. Taming the Complexity of Timeline-Based Planning over Dense Temporal Domains. In 39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 150, pp. 34:1-34:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.34,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano},
  title =	{{Taming the Complexity of Timeline-Based Planning over Dense Temporal Domains}},
  booktitle =	{39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-131-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{150},
  editor =	{Chattopadhyay, Arkadev and Gastin, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-115963},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Timeline-based planning, timed automata, event-clock automata}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2019.17
Synthesis of LTL Formulas from Natural Language Texts: State of the Art and Research Directions

Authors: Andrea Brunello, Angelo Montanari, and Mark Reynolds

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 147, 26th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2019)

Abstract
Linear temporal logic (LTL) is commonly used in model checking tasks; moreover, it is well-suited for the formalization of technical requirements. However, the correct specification and interpretation of temporal logic formulas require a strong mathematical background and can hardly be done by domain experts, who, instead, tend to rely on a natural language description of the intended system behaviour. In such situations, a system that is able to automatically translate English sentences into LTL formulas, and vice versa, would be of great help. While the task of rendering an LTL formula into a more readable English sentence may be carried out in a relatively easy way by properly parsing the formula, the converse is still an open problem, due to the inherent difficulty of interpreting free, natural language texts. Although several partial solutions have been proposed in the past, the literature still lacks a critical assessment of the work done. We address such a shortcoming, presenting the current state of the art for what concerns the English-to-LTL translation problem, and outlining some possible research directions.
Cite as

Andrea Brunello, Angelo Montanari, and Mark Reynolds. Synthesis of LTL Formulas from Natural Language Texts: State of the Art and Research Directions. In 26th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 147, pp. 17:1-17:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brunello_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2019.17,
  author =	{Brunello, Andrea and Montanari, Angelo and Reynolds, Mark},
  title =	{{Synthesis of LTL Formulas from Natural Language Texts: State of the Art and Research Directions}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2019)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-127-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{147},
  editor =	{Gamper, Johann and Pinchinat, Sophie and Sciavicco, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2019.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-113756},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2019.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Evolutionary algorithms, Machine learning, Natural language processing, Semantic parsing, Temporal logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2019.18
Complexity Analysis of a Unifying Algorithm for Model Checking Interval Temporal Logic

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, and Adriano Peron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 147, 26th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2019)

Abstract
The model-checking (MC) problem of Halpern and Shoham Interval Temporal Logic (HS) has been recently investigated in some papers and is known to be decidable. An intriguing open question concerns the exact complexity of the problem for full HS: it is at least EXPSPACE-hard, while the only known upper bound is non-elementary and is obtained by exploiting an abstract representation of Kripke structure paths called descriptors. In this paper we generalize the approach by providing a uniform framework for model-checking full HS and meaningful (almost maximal) fragments, where a specialized type of descriptor is defined for each fragment. We then devise a general MC alternating algorithm parameterized by the type of descriptor which has a polynomially bounded number of alternations and whose running time is bounded by the length of minimal representatives of descriptors (certificates). We analyze the time complexity of the algorithm and give, by non-trivial arguments, tight bounds on the length of certificates. For two types of descriptors, we obtain exponential upper and lower bounds which lead to an elementary MC algorithm for the related HS fragments. For the other types of descriptors, we provide non-elementary lower bounds. This last result addresses a question left open in some papers regarding the possibility of fixing an elementary upper bound on the size of the descriptors for full HS.
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Angelo Montanari, and Adriano Peron. Complexity Analysis of a Unifying Algorithm for Model Checking Interval Temporal Logic. In 26th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 147, pp. 18:1-18:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2019.18,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano},
  title =	{{Complexity Analysis of a Unifying Algorithm for Model Checking Interval Temporal Logic}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2019)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-127-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{147},
  editor =	{Gamper, Johann and Pinchinat, Sophie and Sciavicco, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2019.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-113768},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2019.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interval temporal logic, Model checking, Complexity and succinctness issues}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2018.13
A Game-Theoretic Approach to Timeline-Based Planning with Uncertainty

Authors: Nicola Gigante, Angelo Montanari, Marta Cialdea Mayer, Andrea Orlandini, and Mark Reynolds

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 120, 25th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2018)

Abstract
In timeline-based planning, domains are described as sets of independent, but interacting, components, whose behaviour over time (the set of timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints. A distinguishing feature of timeline-based planning systems is the ability to integrate planning with execution by synthesising control strategies for flexible plans. However, flexible plans can only represent temporal uncertainty, while more complex forms of nondeterminism are needed to deal with a wider range of realistic problems. In this paper, we propose a novel game-theoretic approach to timeline-based planning problems, generalising the state of the art while uniformly handling temporal uncertainty and nondeterminism. We define a general concept of timeline-based game and we show that the notion of winning strategy for these games is strictly more general than that of control strategy for dynamically controllable flexible plans. Moreover, we show that the problem of establishing the existence of such winning strategies is decidable using a doubly exponential amount of space.
Cite as

Nicola Gigante, Angelo Montanari, Marta Cialdea Mayer, Andrea Orlandini, and Mark Reynolds. A Game-Theoretic Approach to Timeline-Based Planning with Uncertainty. In 25th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 120, pp. 13:1-13:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gigante_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2018.13,
  author =	{Gigante, Nicola and Montanari, Angelo and Cialdea Mayer, Marta and Orlandini, Andrea and Reynolds, Mark},
  title =	{{A Game-Theoretic Approach to Timeline-Based Planning with Uncertainty}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2018)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-089-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{120},
  editor =	{Alechina, Natasha and N{\o}rv\r{a}g, Kjetil and Penczek, Wojciech},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2018.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-97786},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2018.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Timeline-based planning with uncertainty, strategic games, decidability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2017.11
Evaluation of Temporal Datasets via Interval Temporal Logic Model Checking

Authors: Dario Della Monica, David de Frutos-Escrig, Angelo Montanari, Aniello Murano, and Guido Sciavicco

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 90, 24th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2017)

Abstract
The problem of temporal dataset evaluation consists in establishing to what extent a set of temporal data (histories) complies with a given temporal condition. It presents a strong resemblance with the problem of model checking enhanced with the ability of rating the compliance degree of a model against a formula. In this paper, we solve the temporal dataset evaluation problem by suitably combining the outcomes of model checking an interval temporal logic formula against sets of histories (finite interval models), possibly taking into account domain-dependent measures/criteria, like, for instance, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. From a technical point of view, the main contribution of the paper is a (deterministic) polynomial time algorithm for interval temporal logic model checking over finite interval models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of a (truly) interval temporal logic model checking in the area of temporal databases and data mining rather than in the formal verification setting.
Cite as

Dario Della Monica, David de Frutos-Escrig, Angelo Montanari, Aniello Murano, and Guido Sciavicco. Evaluation of Temporal Datasets via Interval Temporal Logic Model Checking. In 24th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 90, pp. 11:1-11:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dellamonica_et_al:LIPIcs.TIME.2017.11,
  author =	{Della Monica, Dario and de Frutos-Escrig, David and Montanari, Angelo and Murano, Aniello and Sciavicco, Guido},
  title =	{{Evaluation of Temporal Datasets via Interval Temporal Logic Model Checking}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2017)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-052-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{90},
  editor =	{Schewe, Sven and Schneider, Thomas and Wijsen, Jef},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2017.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-79280},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2017.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dataset Evaluation, Temporal Databases, Model Checking, Interval Temporal Logics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.120
Satisfiability and Model Checking for the Logic of Sub-Intervals under the Homogeneity Assumption

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Alberto Molinari, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 80, 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)

Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the finite satisfiability and model checking problems for the logic D of the sub-interval relation under the homogeneity assumption, that constrains a proposition letter to hold over an interval if and only if it holds over all its points. First, we prove that the satisfiability problem for D, over finite linear orders, is PSPACE-complete; then, we show that its model checking problem, over finite Kripke structures, is PSPACE-complete as well.
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Alberto Molinari, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala. Satisfiability and Model Checking for the Logic of Sub-Intervals under the Homogeneity Assumption. In 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 80, pp. 120:1-120:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.120,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Molinari, Alberto and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano and Sala, Pietro},
  title =	{{Satisfiability and Model Checking for the Logic of Sub-Intervals under the Homogeneity Assumption}},
  booktitle =	{44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)},
  pages =	{120:1--120:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-041-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{80},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Indyk, Piotr and Kuhn, Fabian and Muscholl, Anca},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.120},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-74703},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.120},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interval Temporal Logic, Satisfiability, Model Checking, Decidability, Computational Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2016.26
Interval vs. Point Temporal Logic Model Checking: an Expressiveness Comparison

Authors: Laura Bozzelli, Alberto Molinari, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 65, 36th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2016)

Abstract
Model checking is a powerful method widely explored in formal verification to check the (state-transition) model of a system against desired properties of its behaviour. Classically, properties are expressed by formulas of a temporal logic, such as LTL, CTL, and CTL*. These logics are "point-wise" interpreted, as they describe how the system evolves state-by-state. On the contrary, Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic (HS) is "interval-wise" interpreted, thus allowing one to naturally express properties of computation stretches, spanning a sequence of states, or properties involving temporal aggregations, which are inherently "interval-based". In this paper, we study the expressiveness of HS in model checking, in comparison with that of the standard logics LTL, CTL, and CTL*. To this end, we consider HS endowed with three semantic variants: the state-based semantics, introduced by Montanari et al., which allows branching in the past and in the future, the linear-past semantics, allowing branching only in the future, and the linear semantics, disallowing branching. These variants are compared, as for their expressiveness, among themselves and to standard temporal logics, getting a complete picture. In particular, HS with linear (resp., linear-past) semantics is proved to be equivalent to LTL (resp., finitary CTL*).
Cite as

Laura Bozzelli, Alberto Molinari, Angelo Montanari, Adriano Peron, and Pietro Sala. Interval vs. Point Temporal Logic Model Checking: an Expressiveness Comparison. In 36th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 65, pp. 26:1-26:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bozzelli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2016.26,
  author =	{Bozzelli, Laura and Molinari, Alberto and Montanari, Angelo and Peron, Adriano and Sala, Pietro},
  title =	{{Interval vs. Point Temporal Logic Model Checking: an Expressiveness Comparison}},
  booktitle =	{36th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2016)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-027-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{65},
  editor =	{Lal, Akash and Akshay, S. and Saurabh, Saket and Sen, Sandeep},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2016.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-68615},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2016.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interval Temporal Logics, Expressiveness, Model Checking}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 16 Montanari, Angelo
  • 8 Peron, Adriano
  • 7 Bozzelli, Laura
  • 5 Gigante, Nicola
  • 5 Sala, Pietro
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 6 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Planning under uncertainty
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Temporal reasoning
  • 2 Theory of computation → Modal and temporal logics
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Machine learning
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 Model Checking
  • 3 Interval Temporal Logic
  • 3 Interval temporal logic
  • 3 Model checking
  • 3 Satisfiability
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 17 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2019
  • 3 2020
  • 2 2017
  • 2 2021
  • 2 2023
  • Show More...

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact