28 Search Results for "Pitassi, Toniann"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.58
An Improved Protocol for ExactlyN with More Than 3 Players

Authors: Lianna Hambardzumyan, Toniann Pitassi, Suhail Sherif, Morgan Shirley, and Adi Shraibman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 287, 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)

Abstract
The ExactlyN problem in the number-on-forehead (NOF) communication setting asks k players, each of whom can see every input but their own, if the k input numbers add up to N. Introduced by Chandra, Furst and Lipton in 1983, ExactlyN is important for its role in understanding the strength of randomness in communication complexity with many players. It is also tightly connected to the field of combinatorics: its k-party NOF communication complexity is related to the size of the largest corner-free subset in [N]^{k-1}. In 2021, Linial and Shraibman gave more efficient protocols for ExactlyN for 3 players. As an immediate consequence, this also gave a new construction of larger corner-free subsets in [N]². Later that year Green gave a further refinement to their argument. These results represent the first improvements to the highest-order term for k = 3 since the famous work of Behrend in 1946. In this paper we give a corresponding improvement to the highest-order term for k > 3, the first since Rankin in 1961. That is, we give a more efficient protocol for ExactlyN as well as larger corner-free sets in higher dimensions. Nearly all previous results in this line of research approached the problem from the combinatorics perspective, implicitly resulting in non-constructive protocols for ExactlyN. Approaching the problem from the communication complexity point of view and constructing explicit protocols for ExactlyN was key to the improvements in the k = 3 setting. As a further contribution we provide explicit protocols for ExactlyN for any number of players which serves as a base for our improvement.
Cite as

Lianna Hambardzumyan, Toniann Pitassi, Suhail Sherif, Morgan Shirley, and Adi Shraibman. An Improved Protocol for ExactlyN with More Than 3 Players. In 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 287, pp. 58:1-58:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hambardzumyan_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.58,
  author =	{Hambardzumyan, Lianna and Pitassi, Toniann and Sherif, Suhail and Shirley, Morgan and Shraibman, Adi},
  title =	{{An Improved Protocol for ExactlyN with More Than 3 Players}},
  booktitle =	{15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)},
  pages =	{58:1--58:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-309-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{287},
  editor =	{Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.58},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-195868},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.58},
  annote =	{Keywords: Corner-free sets, number-on-forehead communication}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.4
On the Algebraic Proof Complexity of Tensor Isomorphism

Authors: Nicola Galesi, Joshua A. Grochow, Toniann Pitassi, and Adrian She

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)

Abstract
The Tensor Isomorphism problem (TI) has recently emerged as having connections to multiple areas of research within complexity and beyond, but the current best upper bound is essentially the brute force algorithm. Being an algebraic problem, TI (or rather, proving that two tensors are non-isomorphic) lends itself very naturally to algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems, such as the Polynomial Calculus (PC) and Sum of Squares (SoS). For its combinatorial cousin Graph Isomorphism, essentially optimal lower bounds are known for approaches based on PC and SoS (Berkholz & Grohe, SODA '17). Our main results are an Ω(n) lower bound on PC degree or SoS degree for Tensor Isomorphism, and a nontrivial upper bound for testing isomorphism of tensors of bounded rank. We also show that PC cannot perform basic linear algebra in sub-linear degree, such as comparing the rank of two matrices (which is essentially the same as 2-TI), or deriving BA = I from AB = I. As linear algebra is a key tool for understanding tensors, we introduce a strictly stronger proof system, PC+Inv, which allows as derivation rules all substitution instances of the implication AB = I → BA = I. We conjecture that even PC+Inv cannot solve TI in polynomial time either, but leave open getting lower bounds on PC+Inv for any system of equations, let alone those for TI. We also highlight many other open questions about proof complexity approaches to TI.
Cite as

Nicola Galesi, Joshua A. Grochow, Toniann Pitassi, and Adrian She. On the Algebraic Proof Complexity of Tensor Isomorphism. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 264, pp. 4:1-4:40, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{galesi_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2023.4,
  author =	{Galesi, Nicola and Grochow, Joshua A. and Pitassi, Toniann and She, Adrian},
  title =	{{On the Algebraic Proof Complexity of Tensor Isomorphism}},
  booktitle =	{38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:40},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-282-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{264},
  editor =	{Ta-Shma, Amnon},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-182748},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic proof complexity, Tensor Isomorphism, Graph Isomorphism, Polynomial Calculus, Sum-of-Squares, reductions, lower bounds, proof complexity of linear algebra}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7
Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Variables over Finite Fields

Authors: Russell Impagliazzo, Sasank Mouli, and Toniann Pitassi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)

Abstract
For every prime p > 0, every n > 0 and κ = O(log n), we show the existence of an unsatisfiable system of polynomial equations over O(n log n) variables of degree O(log n) such that any Polynomial Calculus refutation over 𝔽_p with M extension variables, each depending on at most κ original variables requires size exp(Ω(n²)/10^κ(M + n log n))
Cite as

Russell Impagliazzo, Sasank Mouli, and Toniann Pitassi. Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Variables over Finite Fields. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 264, pp. 7:1-7:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{impagliazzo_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7,
  author =	{Impagliazzo, Russell and Mouli, Sasank and Pitassi, Toniann},
  title =	{{Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Variables over Finite Fields}},
  booktitle =	{38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-282-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{264},
  editor =	{Ta-Shma, Amnon},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-182774},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof complexity, Algebraic proof systems, Polynomial Calculus, Extension variables, AC⁰\lbrackp\rbrack-Frege}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.16
Matrix Multiplication and Number on the Forehead Communication

Authors: Josh Alman and Jarosław Błasiok

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)

Abstract
Three-player Number On the Forehead communication may be thought of as a three-player Number In the Hand promise model, in which each player is given the inputs that are supposedly on the other two players' heads, and promised that they are consistent with the inputs of the other players. The set of all allowed inputs under this promise may be thought of as an order-3 tensor. We surprisingly observe that this tensor is exactly the matrix multiplication tensor, which is widely studied in the design of fast matrix multiplication algorithms. Using this connection, we prove a number of results about both Number On the Forehead communication and matrix multiplication, each by using known results or techniques about the other. For example, we show how the Laser method, a key technique used to design the best matrix multiplication algorithms, can also be used to design communication protocols for a variety of problems. We also show how known lower bounds for Number On the Forehead communication can be used to bound properties of the matrix multiplication tensor such as its zeroing out subrank. Finally, we substantially generalize known methods based on slice-rank for studying communication, and show how they directly relate to the matrix multiplication exponent ω.
Cite as

Josh Alman and Jarosław Błasiok. Matrix Multiplication and Number on the Forehead Communication. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 264, pp. 16:1-16:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alman_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2023.16,
  author =	{Alman, Josh and B{\l}asiok, Jaros{\l}aw},
  title =	{{Matrix Multiplication and Number on the Forehead Communication}},
  booktitle =	{38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-282-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{264},
  editor =	{Ta-Shma, Amnon},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-182861},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Number on the forehead, communication complexity, matrix multiplication}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.89
The Strength of Equality Oracles in Communication

Authors: Toniann Pitassi, Morgan Shirley, and Adi Shraibman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 251, 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)

Abstract
It is well-known that randomized communication protocols are more powerful than deterministic protocols. In particular the Equality function requires Ω(n) deterministic communication complexity but has efficient randomized protocols. Previous work of Chattopadhyay, Lovett and Vinyals shows that randomized communication is strictly stronger than what can be solved by deterministic protocols equipped with an Equality oracle. Despite this separation, we are far from understanding the exact strength of Equality oracles in the context of communication complexity. In this work we focus on nondeterminisic communication equipped with an Equality oracle, which is a subclass of Merlin-Arthur communication. We show that this inclusion is strict by proving that the previously-studied Integer Inner Product function, which can be efficiently computed even with bounded-error randomness, cannot be computed using sublinear communication in the nondeterministic Equality model. To prove this we give a new matrix-theoretic characterization of the nondeterministic Equality model: specifically, there is a tight connection between this model and a covering number based on the blocky matrices of Hambardzumyan, Hatami, and Hatami, as well as a natural variant of the Gamma-2 factorization norm. Similar equivalences are shown for the unambiguous nondeterministic model with Equality oracles. A bonus result arises from these proofs: for the studied communication models, a single Equality oracle call suffices without loss of generality. Our results allow us to prove a separation between deterministic and unambiguous nondeterminism in the presence of Equality oracles. This stands in contrast to the result of Yannakakis which shows that these models are polynomially-related without oracles. We suggest a number of intriguing open questions along this direction of inquiry, as well as others that arise from our work.
Cite as

Toniann Pitassi, Morgan Shirley, and Adi Shraibman. The Strength of Equality Oracles in Communication. In 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 251, pp. 89:1-89:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pitassi_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.89,
  author =	{Pitassi, Toniann and Shirley, Morgan and Shraibman, Adi},
  title =	{{The Strength of Equality Oracles in Communication}},
  booktitle =	{14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)},
  pages =	{89:1--89:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-263-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{251},
  editor =	{Tauman Kalai, Yael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.89},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-175927},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.89},
  annote =	{Keywords: Factorization norm, blocky rank, Merlin-Arthur}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.12
Robustly Separating the Arithmetic Monotone Hierarchy via Graph Inner-Product

Authors: Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Utsab Ghosal, and Partha Mukhopadhyay

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 250, 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022)

Abstract
We establish an ε-sensitive hierarchy separation for monotone arithmetic computations. The notion of ε-sensitive monotone lower bounds was recently introduced by Hrubeš [Pavel Hrubeš, 2020]. We show the following: - There exists a monotone polynomial over n variables in VNP that cannot be computed by 2^o(n) size monotone circuits in an ε-sensitive way as long as ε ≥ 2^(-Ω(n)). - There exists a polynomial over n variables that can be computed by polynomial size monotone circuits but cannot be computed by any monotone arithmetic branching program (ABP) of n^o(log n) size, even in an ε-sensitive fashion as long as ε ≥ n^(-Ω(log n)). - There exists a polynomial over n variables that can be computed by polynomial size monotone ABPs but cannot be computed in n^o(log n) size by monotone formulas even in an ε-sensitive way, when ε ≥ n^(-Ω(log n)). - There exists a polynomial over n variables that can be computed by width-4 polynomial size monotone arithmetic branching programs (ABPs) but cannot be computed in 2^o(n^{1/d}) size by monotone, unbounded fan-in formulas of product depth d even in an ε-sensitive way, when ε ≥ 2^(-Ω(n^{1/d})). This yields an ε-sensitive separation of constant-depth monotone formulas and constant-width monotone ABPs. The novel feature of our separations is that in each case the polynomial exhibited is obtained from a graph inner-product polynomial by choosing an appropriate graph topology. The closely related graph inner-product Boolean function for expander graphs was invented by Hayes [Thomas P. Hayes, 2011], also independently by Pitassi [Toniann Pitassi, 2009], in the context of best-partition multiparty communication complexity.
Cite as

Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Utsab Ghosal, and Partha Mukhopadhyay. Robustly Separating the Arithmetic Monotone Hierarchy via Graph Inner-Product. In 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 250, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chattopadhyay_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.12,
  author =	{Chattopadhyay, Arkadev and Ghosal, Utsab and Mukhopadhyay, Partha},
  title =	{{Robustly Separating the Arithmetic Monotone Hierarchy via Graph Inner-Product}},
  booktitle =	{42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-261-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{250},
  editor =	{Dawar, Anuj and Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-174045},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic Complexity, Discrepancy, Lower Bounds, Monotone Computations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.8
Trading Time and Space in Catalytic Branching Programs

Authors: James Cook and Ian Mertz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 234, 37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022)

Abstract
An m-catalytic branching program (Girard, Koucký, McKenzie 2015) is a set of m distinct branching programs for f which are permitted to share internal (i.e. non-source non-sink) nodes. While originally introduced as a non-uniform analogue to catalytic space, this also gives a natural notion of amortized non-uniform space complexity for f, namely the smallest value |G|/m for an m-catalytic branching program G for f (Potechin 2017). Potechin (2017) showed that every function f has amortized size O(n), witnessed by an m-catalytic branching program where m = 2^(2ⁿ-1). We recreate this result by defining a catalytic algorithm for evaluating polynomials using a large amount of space but O(n) time. This allows us to balance this with previously known algorithms which are efficient with respect to space at the cost of time (Cook, Mertz 2020, 2021). We show that for any ε ≥ 2n^(-1), every function f has an m-catalytic branching program of size O_ε(mn), where m = 2^(2^(ε n)). We similarly recreate an improved result due to Robere and Zuiddam (2021), and show that for d ≤ n and ε ≥ 2d^(-1), the same result holds for m = 2^binom(n, ≤ ε d) as long as f is a degree-d polynomial over 𝔽₂. We also show that for certain classes of functions, m can be reduced to 2^(poly n) while still maintaining linear or quasi-linear amortized size. In the other direction, we bound the necessary length, and by extension the amortized size, of any permutation branching program for an arbitrary function between 3n and 4n-4.
Cite as

James Cook and Ian Mertz. Trading Time and Space in Catalytic Branching Programs. In 37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 234, pp. 8:1-8:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cook_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2022.8,
  author =	{Cook, James and Mertz, Ian},
  title =	{{Trading Time and Space in Catalytic Branching Programs}},
  booktitle =	{37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-241-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{234},
  editor =	{Lovett, Shachar},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-165708},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: complexity theory, branching programs, amortized, space complexity, catalytic computation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.8
Secret Sharing, Slice Formulas, and Monotone Real Circuits

Authors: Benny Applebaum, Amos Beimel, Oded Nir, Naty Peter, and Toniann Pitassi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)

Abstract
A secret-sharing scheme allows to distribute a secret s among n parties such that only some predefined "authorized" sets of parties can reconstruct the secret s, and all other "unauthorized" sets learn nothing about s. For over 30 years, it was known that any (monotone) collection of authorized sets can be realized by a secret-sharing scheme whose shares are of size 2^{n-o(n)} and until recently no better scheme was known. In a recent breakthrough, Liu and Vaikuntanathan (STOC 2018) have reduced the share size to 2^{0.994n+o(n)}, and this was further improved by several follow-ups accumulating in an upper bound of 1.5^{n+o(n)} (Applebaum and Nir, CRYPTO 2021). Following these advances, it is natural to ask whether these new approaches can lead to a truly sub-exponential upper-bound of 2^{n^{1-ε}} for some constant ε > 0, or even all the way down to polynomial upper-bounds. In this paper, we relate this question to the complexity of computing monotone Boolean functions by monotone real circuits (MRCs) - a computational model that was introduced by Pudlák (J. Symb. Log., 1997) in the context of proof complexity. We introduce a new notion of "separable" MRCs that lies between monotone real circuits and monotone real formulas (MRFs). As our main results, we show that recent constructions of general secret-sharing schemes implicitly give rise to separable MRCs for general monotone functions of similar complexity, and that some monotone functions (in monotone NP) cannot be computed by sub-exponential size separable MRCs. Interestingly, it seems that proving similar lower-bounds for general MRCs is beyond the reach of current techniques. We use this connection to obtain lower-bounds against a natural family of secret-sharing schemes, as well as new non-trivial upper-bounds for MRCs. Specifically, we conclude that recent approaches for secret-sharing schemes cannot achieve sub-exponential share size and that every monotone function can be realized by an MRC (or even MRF) of complexity 1.5^{n+o(n)}. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first improvement over the trivial 2^{n-o(n)} upper-bound. Along the way, we show that the recent constructions of general secret-sharing schemes implicitly give rise to Boolean formulas over slice functions and prove that such formulas can be simulated by separable MRCs of similar size. On a conceptual level, our paper continues the rich line of study that relates the share size of secret-sharing schemes to monotone complexity measures.
Cite as

Benny Applebaum, Amos Beimel, Oded Nir, Naty Peter, and Toniann Pitassi. Secret Sharing, Slice Formulas, and Monotone Real Circuits. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 8:1-8:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{applebaum_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.8,
  author =	{Applebaum, Benny and Beimel, Amos and Nir, Oded and Peter, Naty and Pitassi, Toniann},
  title =	{{Secret Sharing, Slice Formulas, and Monotone Real Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-156046},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secret Sharing Schemes, Monotone Real Circuits}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.70
Extremely Deep Proofs

Authors: Noah Fleming, Toniann Pitassi, and Robert Robere

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)

Abstract
We further the study of supercritical tradeoffs in proof and circuit complexity, which is a type of tradeoff between complexity parameters where restricting one complexity parameter forces another to exceed its worst-case upper bound. In particular, we prove a new family of supercritical tradeoffs between depth and size for Resolution, Res(k), and Cutting Planes proofs. For each of these proof systems we construct, for each c ≤ n^{1-ε}, a formula with n^{O(c)} clauses and n variables that has a proof of size n^{O(c)} but in which any proof of size no more than roughly exponential in n^{1-ε}/c must necessarily have depth ≈ n^c. By setting c = o(n^{1-ε}) we therefore obtain exponential lower bounds on proof depth; this far exceeds the trivial worst-case upper bound of n. In doing so we give a simplified proof of a supercritical depth/width tradeoff for tree-like Resolution from [Alexander A. Razborov, 2016]. Finally, we outline several conjectures that would imply similar supercritical tradeoffs between size and depth in circuit complexity via lifting theorems.
Cite as

Noah Fleming, Toniann Pitassi, and Robert Robere. Extremely Deep Proofs. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 70:1-70:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fleming_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.70,
  author =	{Fleming, Noah and Pitassi, Toniann and Robere, Robert},
  title =	{{Extremely Deep Proofs}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{70:1--70:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.70},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-156665},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.70},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof Complexity, Tradeoffs, Resolution, Cutting Planes}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.104
Lifting with Sunflowers

Authors: Shachar Lovett, Raghu Meka, Ian Mertz, Toniann Pitassi, and Jiapeng Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)

Abstract
Query-to-communication lifting theorems translate lower bounds on query complexity to lower bounds for the corresponding communication model. In this paper, we give a simplified proof of deterministic lifting (in both the tree-like and dag-like settings). Our proof uses elementary counting together with a novel connection to the sunflower lemma. In addition to a simplified proof, our approach opens up a new avenue of attack towards proving lifting theorems with improved gadget size - one of the main challenges in the area. Focusing on one of the most widely used gadgets - the index gadget - existing lifting techniques are known to require at least a quadratic gadget size. Our new approach combined with robust sunflower lemmas allows us to reduce the gadget size to near linear. We conjecture that it can be further improved to polylogarithmic, similar to the known bounds for the corresponding robust sunflower lemmas.
Cite as

Shachar Lovett, Raghu Meka, Ian Mertz, Toniann Pitassi, and Jiapeng Zhang. Lifting with Sunflowers. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 104:1-104:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lovett_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.104,
  author =	{Lovett, Shachar and Meka, Raghu and Mertz, Ian and Pitassi, Toniann and Zhang, Jiapeng},
  title =	{{Lifting with Sunflowers}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{104:1--104:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.104},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-157004},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.104},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lifting theorems, communication complexity, combinatorics, sunflowers}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.6
On the Power and Limitations of Branch and Cut

Authors: Noah Fleming, Mika Göös, Russell Impagliazzo, Toniann Pitassi, Robert Robere, Li-Yang Tan, and Avi Wigderson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 200, 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)

Abstract
The Stabbing Planes proof system [Paul Beame et al., 2018] was introduced to model the reasoning carried out in practical mixed integer programming solvers. As a proof system, it is powerful enough to simulate Cutting Planes and to refute the Tseitin formulas - certain unsatisfiable systems of linear equations od 2 - which are canonical hard examples for many algebraic proof systems. In a recent (and surprising) result, Dadush and Tiwari [Daniel Dadush and Samarth Tiwari, 2020] showed that these short refutations of the Tseitin formulas could be translated into quasi-polynomial size and depth Cutting Planes proofs, refuting a long-standing conjecture. This translation raises several interesting questions. First, whether all Stabbing Planes proofs can be efficiently simulated by Cutting Planes. This would allow for the substantial analysis done on the Cutting Planes system to be lifted to practical mixed integer programming solvers. Second, whether the quasi-polynomial depth of these proofs is inherent to Cutting Planes. In this paper we make progress towards answering both of these questions. First, we show that any Stabbing Planes proof with bounded coefficients (SP*) can be translated into Cutting Planes. As a consequence of the known lower bounds for Cutting Planes, this establishes the first exponential lower bounds on SP*. Using this translation, we extend the result of Dadush and Tiwari to show that Cutting Planes has short refutations of any unsatisfiable system of linear equations over a finite field. Like the Cutting Planes proofs of Dadush and Tiwari, our refutations also incur a quasi-polynomial blow-up in depth, and we conjecture that this is inherent. As a step towards this conjecture, we develop a new geometric technique for proving lower bounds on the depth of Cutting Planes proofs. This allows us to establish the first lower bounds on the depth of Semantic Cutting Planes proofs of the Tseitin formulas.
Cite as

Noah Fleming, Mika Göös, Russell Impagliazzo, Toniann Pitassi, Robert Robere, Li-Yang Tan, and Avi Wigderson. On the Power and Limitations of Branch and Cut. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 200, pp. 6:1-6:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fleming_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2021.6,
  author =	{Fleming, Noah and G\"{o}\"{o}s, Mika and Impagliazzo, Russell and Pitassi, Toniann and Robere, Robert and Tan, Li-Yang and Wigderson, Avi},
  title =	{{On the Power and Limitations of Branch and Cut}},
  booktitle =	{36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-193-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{200},
  editor =	{Kabanets, Valentine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142809},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof Complexity, Integer Programming, Cutting Planes, Branch and Cut, Stabbing Planes}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.36
On the Pseudo-Deterministic Query Complexity of NP Search Problems

Authors: Shafi Goldwasser, Russell Impagliazzo, Toniann Pitassi, and Rahul Santhanam

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 200, 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)

Abstract
We study pseudo-deterministic query complexity - randomized query algorithms that are required to output the same answer with high probability on all inputs. We prove Ω(√n) lower bounds on the pseudo-deterministic complexity of a large family of search problems based on unsatisfiable random CNF instances, and also for the promise problem (FIND1) of finding a 1 in a vector populated with at least half one’s. This gives an exponential separation between randomized query complexity and pseudo-deterministic complexity, which is tight in the quantum setting. As applications we partially solve a related combinatorial coloring problem, and we separate random tree-like Resolution from its pseudo-deterministic version. In contrast to our lower bound, we show, surprisingly, that in the zero-error, average case setting, the three notions (deterministic, randomized, pseudo-deterministic) collapse.
Cite as

Shafi Goldwasser, Russell Impagliazzo, Toniann Pitassi, and Rahul Santhanam. On the Pseudo-Deterministic Query Complexity of NP Search Problems. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 200, pp. 36:1-36:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goldwasser_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2021.36,
  author =	{Goldwasser, Shafi and Impagliazzo, Russell and Pitassi, Toniann and Santhanam, Rahul},
  title =	{{On the Pseudo-Deterministic Query Complexity of NP Search Problems}},
  booktitle =	{36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-193-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{200},
  editor =	{Kabanets, Valentine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-143104},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pseudo-determinism, Query complexity, Proof complexity}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.5
Algebraic Proof Systems (Invited Talk)

Authors: Toniann Pitassi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 198, 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)

Abstract
Given a set of polynomial equations over a field F, how hard is it to prove that they are simultaneously unsolvable? In the last twenty years, algebraic proof systems for refuting such systems of equations have been extensively studied, revealing close connections to both upper bounds (connections between short refutations and efficient approximation algorithms) and lower bounds (connections to fundamental questions in circuit complexity.) The Ideal Proof System (IPS) is a simple yet powerful algebraic proof system, with very close connections to circuit lower bounds: [Joshua A. Grochow and Toniann Pitassi, 2018] proved that lower bounds for IPS imply VNP ≠ VP, and very recently connections in the other direction have been made, showing that circuit lower bounds imply IPS lower bounds [Rahul Santhanam and Iddo Tzameret, 2021; Yaroslav Alekseev et al., 2020]. In this talk I will survey the landscape of algebraic proof systems, focusing on their connections to complexity theory, derandomization, and standard proposional proof complexity. I will discuss the state-of-the-art lower bounds, as well as the relationship between algebraic systems and textbook style propositional proof systems. Finally we end with open problems, and some recent progress towards proving superpolynomial lower bounds for bounded-depth Frege systems with modular gates (a major open problem in propositional proof complexity).
Cite as

Toniann Pitassi. Algebraic Proof Systems (Invited Talk). In 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 198, p. 5:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pitassi:LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.5,
  author =	{Pitassi, Toniann},
  title =	{{Algebraic Proof Systems}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-195-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{198},
  editor =	{Bansal, Nikhil and Merelli, Emanuela and Worrell, James},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-140747},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: complexity theory, proof complexity, algebraic circuits}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.38
Sum of Squares Bounds for the Ordering Principle

Authors: Aaron Potechin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 169, 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)

Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the sum of squares hierarchy (SOS) on the ordering principle on n elements (which has N = Θ(n²) variables). We prove that degree O(√nlog(n)) SOS can prove the ordering principle. We then show that this upper bound is essentially tight by proving that for any ε > 0, SOS requires degree Ω(n^(1/2 - ε)) to prove the ordering principle.
Cite as

Aaron Potechin. Sum of Squares Bounds for the Ordering Principle. In 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 169, pp. 38:1-38:37, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{potechin:LIPIcs.CCC.2020.38,
  author =	{Potechin, Aaron},
  title =	{{Sum of Squares Bounds for the Ordering Principle}},
  booktitle =	{35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:37},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-156-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{169},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-125900},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: sum of squares hierarchy, proof complexity, ordering principle}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.92
Nondeterministic and Randomized Boolean Hierarchies in Communication Complexity

Authors: Toniann Pitassi, Morgan Shirley, and Thomas Watson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 168, 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020)

Abstract
We investigate the power of randomness in two-party communication complexity. In particular, we study the model where the parties can make a constant number of queries to a function with an efficient one-sided-error randomized protocol. The complexity classes defined by this model comprise the Randomized Boolean Hierarchy, which is analogous to the Boolean Hierarchy but defined with one-sided-error randomness instead of nondeterminism. Our techniques connect the Nondeterministic and Randomized Boolean Hierarchies, and we provide a complete picture of the relationships among complexity classes within and across these two hierarchies. In particular, we prove that the Randomized Boolean Hierarchy does not collapse, and we prove a query-to-communication lifting theorem for all levels of the Nondeterministic Boolean Hierarchy and use it to resolve an open problem stated in the paper by Halstenberg and Reischuk (CCC 1988) which initiated the study of this hierarchy.
Cite as

Toniann Pitassi, Morgan Shirley, and Thomas Watson. Nondeterministic and Randomized Boolean Hierarchies in Communication Complexity. In 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 168, pp. 92:1-92:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pitassi_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.92,
  author =	{Pitassi, Toniann and Shirley, Morgan and Watson, Thomas},
  title =	{{Nondeterministic and Randomized Boolean Hierarchies in Communication Complexity}},
  booktitle =	{47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020)},
  pages =	{92:1--92:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-138-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{168},
  editor =	{Czumaj, Artur and Dawar, Anuj and Merelli, Emanuela},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.92},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-124992},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.92},
  annote =	{Keywords: Boolean hierarchies, lifting theorems, query complexity}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 21 Pitassi, Toniann
  • 5 Watson, Thomas
  • 4 Göös, Mika
  • 4 Impagliazzo, Russell
  • 4 Robere, Robert
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 10 Theory of computation → Proof complexity
  • 8 Theory of computation → Communication complexity
  • 3 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • 3 Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography
  • 3 Theory of computation → Oracles and decision trees
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 communication complexity
  • 4 proof complexity
  • 3 Cutting Planes
  • 3 Proof Complexity
  • 3 complexity theory
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 28 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2019
  • 5 2022
  • 4 2023
  • 3 2020
  • 3 2021
  • Show More...

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact