A Modular Approach for the Analysis of Blockchain Consensus Protocol Under Churn (Poster)

Authors Floris Ciprian Dinu, Silvia Bonomi



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.FAB.2022.8.pdf
  • Filesize: 299 kB
  • 2 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Floris Ciprian Dinu
  • Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy
Silvia Bonomi
  • Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy

Cite AsGet BibTex

Floris Ciprian Dinu and Silvia Bonomi. A Modular Approach for the Analysis of Blockchain Consensus Protocol Under Churn (Poster). In 5th International Symposium on Foundations and Applications of Blockchain 2022 (FAB 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 101, pp. 8:1-8:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.FAB.2022.8

Abstract

Blockchain is an emerging technology that gained a lot of attention in the last years. Many different consensus protocols have been proposed to improve both the scalability and the resilience of existing blockchain. However, all these solutions have been defined for rather static settings. We propose a modular approach for analysing and comparing different consensus protocols used in blockchain under churn.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computer systems organization → Reliability
  • Information systems → Distributed storage
Keywords
  • Blockchain Dependability
  • Dynamic Distributed Systems
  • Simulation

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Ethan Buchman, Jae Kwon, and Zarko Milosevic. The latest gossip on BFT consensus. CoRR, abs/1807.04938, 2018. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04938.
  2. Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov. Practical byzantine fault tolerance. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI '99, pages 173-186, USA, 1999. USENIX Association. Google Scholar
  3. Brad Chase and Ethan MacBrough. Analysis of the XRP ledger consensus protocol. CoRR, abs/1802.07242, 2018. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07242.
  4. David Mazieres. The stellar consensus protocol: A federated model for internet-level consensus. Stellar Development Foundation, 2015. Google Scholar
  5. OMNeT++. Home page, 2022. URL: https://omnetpp.org.
  6. Yang Xiao, Ning Zhang, Wenjing Lou, and Y Thomas Hou. A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(2):1432-1465, 2020. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail