DROPS

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.15

On the Send-Synchronizability Problem for Mailbox Communication

Authors: Romain Delpy, Anca Muscholl, and Grégoire Sutre

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract

A system of communicating automata is send-synchronizable if its set of send sequences (i.e., the projection on send actions of its executions) is the same when communications are asynchronous and when they are rendez-vous synchronizations. Send-synchronizability was claimed to be decidable for the mailbox semantics (Basu and Bultan, 2011) and for the peer-to-peer semantics (Basu and Bultan, 2016). Finkel and Lozes showed in 2017 that the proofs of these results are flawed, and they proved that send-synchronizability is in fact undecidable for peer-to-peer systems. The send-synchronizability problem for mailbox systems was left open. A partial solution was recently proposed in (Di Giusto, Laversa and Peters, 2024). In this paper, we revisit the send-synchronizability problem for mailbox systems. Firstly, we show that send-synchronizability is undecidable for mailbox systems, thus closing the question left open in (Finkel and Lozes, 2023) and (Di Giusto, Laversa and Peters, 2024). Secondly, we show that send-synchronizability is decidable for the class of 1-schedulable mailbox systems. A system is 1-schedulable if every execution can be re-scheduled into an equivalent execution where each send is either immediately followed by its matching receive, or is never matched. Despite the apparent similarity between send-synchronizability and 1-schedulability, the proof that send-synchronizability is decidable for 1-schedulable mailbox systems is quite involved. We believe that the techniques that we develop in this proof could be used to address other problems on mailbox systems, such as the realizability problem.

Cite as

Romain Delpy, Anca Muscholl, and Grégoire Sutre. On the Send-Synchronizability Problem for Mailbox Communication. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 15:1-15:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{delpy_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.15,
  author =	{Delpy, Romain and Muscholl, Anca and Sutre, Gr\'{e}goire},
  title =	{{On the Send-Synchronizability Problem for Mailbox Communication}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239659},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Concurrent programming, Mailbox communication, Verification, Synchronizability}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2024.22

An Automata-Based Approach for Synchronizable Mailbox Communication

Authors: Romain Delpy, Anca Muscholl, and Grégoire Sutre

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 311, 35th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2024)

Abstract

We revisit finite-state communicating systems with round-based communication under mailbox semantics. Mailboxes correspond to one FIFO buffer per process (instead of one buffer per pair of processes in peer-to-peer systems). Round-based communication corresponds to sequences of rounds in which processes can first send messages, then only receive (and receives must be in the same round as their sends). A system is called synchronizable if every execution can be re-scheduled into an equivalent execution that is a sequence of rounds. Previous work mostly considered the setting where rounds have fixed size. Our main contribution shows that the problem whether a mailbox communication system complies with the round-based policy, with no size limitation on rounds, is PSPACE-complete. For this we use a novel automata-based approach, that also allows to determine the precise complexity (PSPACE) of several questions considered in previous literature.

Cite as

Romain Delpy, Anca Muscholl, and Grégoire Sutre. An Automata-Based Approach for Synchronizable Mailbox Communication. In 35th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 311, pp. 22:1-22:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{delpy_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2024.22,
  author =	{Delpy, Romain and Muscholl, Anca and Sutre, Gr\'{e}goire},
  title =	{{An Automata-Based Approach for Synchronizable Mailbox Communication}},
  booktitle =	{35th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2024)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-339-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{311},
  editor =	{Majumdar, Rupak and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2024.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207947},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2024.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Concurrent programming, Mailbox communication, Verification}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Delpy, Romain

On the Send-Synchronizability Problem for Mailbox Communication

Abstract

Cite as

An Automata-Based Approach for Synchronizable Mailbox Communication

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message