Search Results

We study integer linear programs (ILP) of the form min{c^⊤ x | Ax = b,l ≤ x ≤ u,x ∈ ℤⁿ} and analyze their parameterized complexity with respect to their distance to the generalized matching problem, following the well-established approach of capturing the hardness of a problem by the distance to triviality. The generalized matching problem is an ILP where each column of the constraint matrix has 1-norm of at most 2. It captures several well-known polynomial time solvable problems such as matching and flow problems. We parameterize by the size of variable and constraint backdoors, which measure the least number of columns or rows that must be deleted to obtain a generalized matching ILP. This extends generalized matching problems by allowing a parameterized number of additional arbitrary variables or constraints, yielding a novel parameter. We present the following results: (i) a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for ILPs parameterized by the size p of a minimum variable backdoor to generalized matching; (ii) a randomized slice-wise polynomial (XP) time algorithm for ILPs parameterized by the size h of a minimum constraint backdoor to generalized matching as long as c and A are encoded in unary; (iii) we complement (ii) by proving that solving an ILP is W[1]-hard when parameterized by h even when c,A,l,u have coefficients of constant size. To obtain (i), we prove a variant of lattice-convexity of the degree sequences of weighted b-matchings, which we study in the light of SBO jump M-convex functions. This allows us to model the matching part as a polyhedral constraint on the integer backdoor variables. The resulting ILP is solved in FPT time using an integer programming algorithm. For (ii), the randomized XP time algorithm is obtained by pseudo-polynomially reducing the problem to the exact matching problem. To prevent an exponential blowup in terms of the encoding length of b, we bound the Graver complexity of the constraint matrix and employ a Graver augmentation local search framework. The hardness result (iii) is obtained through a parameterized reduction from ILP with h constraints and coefficients encoded in unary.