Search Results

Documents authored by Rogers, Anna


Document
Linguistics and Language Models: What Can They Learn from Each Other? (Dagstuhl Seminar 25301)

Authors: Anna Rogers, Nathan Schneider, Bonnie Webber, A. Seza Doğruöz, and Asad Sayeed

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 15, Issue 7 (2026)


Abstract
An international group of 40 scholars in computational linguistics, natural language processing, and cognitive science was assembled to discuss the relationship between linguistics and contemporary language models. Over the course of the week, presentations and work sessions grappled with questions about how LMs can support linguistic research (either as a source of evidence, or as a tool); how linguistic knowledge can inform the design, interpretation, or application of LMs; and what framing is appropriate for the language functionality of LMs.

Cite as

Anna Rogers, Nathan Schneider, Bonnie Webber, A. Seza Doğruöz, and Asad Sayeed. Linguistics and Language Models: What Can They Learn from Each Other? (Dagstuhl Seminar 25301). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp. 187-212, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{rogers_et_al:DagRep.15.7.187,
  author =	{Rogers, Anna and Schneider, Nathan and Webber, Bonnie and Do\u{g}ru\"{o}z, A. Seza and Sayeed, Asad},
  title =	{{Linguistics and Language Models: What Can They Learn from Each Other? (Dagstuhl Seminar 25301)}},
  pages =	{187--212},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{15},
  number =	{7},
  editor =	{Rogers, Anna and Schneider, Nathan and Webber, Bonnie and Do\u{g}ru\"{o}z, A. Seza and Sayeed, Asad},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.15.7.187},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-257652},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.15.7.187},
  annote =	{Keywords: cognitive modelling, language models, linguistic theory}
}
Document
Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052)

Authors: Iryna Gurevych, Anna Rogers, Nihar B. Shah, and Jingyan Wang

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 1 (2024)


Abstract
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 24052 "Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review". This seminar provided a point of reflection on decades of personal experience of the participants in organizing different kinds of peer-reviewed venues in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and beyond, enabling an in-depth discussion of what has been tried, what seems to work and what doesn't. The outcomes of the seminar include a white paper co-authored by most of the seminar participants, which outlines the research program, methodological and empirical challenges for NLP for peer review. The discussions at the seminar also resulted in several concrete policy proposals and initiatives, some of which are already in motion at the Association for Computational Linguistics and elsewhere.

Cite as

Iryna Gurevych, Anna Rogers, Nihar B. Shah, and Jingyan Wang. Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp. 130-161, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{gurevych_et_al:DagRep.14.1.130,
  author =	{Gurevych, Iryna and Rogers, Anna and Shah, Nihar B. and Wang, Jingyan},
  title =	{{Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052)}},
  pages =	{130--161},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{14},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Gurevych, Iryna and Rogers, Anna and Shah, Nihar B. and Wang, Jingyan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.14.1.130},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204941},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.14.1.130},
  annote =	{Keywords: Peer Review, Natural Language Processing}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail