DROPS

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.21

An Empirical Analysis of Approximation Algorithms for the Unweighted Tree Augmentation Problem

Authors: Luke Hawranick, Matthew Williamson, Jacob Restanio, K. Subramani, and Cody Klingler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 371, 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)

Abstract

In this paper, we perform an experimental study of approximation algorithms for the unweighted tree augmentation problem (UTAP). Our goal is to establish a baseline performance for several existing approximation algorithms on actual instances rather than worst-case instances. In particular, we are interested in whether the algorithms' performance in practical instances is consistent with their worst-case guarantee rankings. We are also interested in whether preprocessing times, implementation difficulties, and running times justify the use of an algorithm in practice. We profile and analyze three approximation algorithms from the literature against a simple randomized algorithm. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated using metrics for space usage, running time, and solution quality. We found that the simple randomized algorithm is very competitive with the approximation algorithms and that the algorithms do not necessarily rank according to their theoretical guarantees. The randomized algorithm is easier to implement and understand, using less space than any of the more sophisticated approximation algorithms.

Cite as

Luke Hawranick, Matthew Williamson, Jacob Restanio, K. Subramani, and Cody Klingler. An Empirical Analysis of Approximation Algorithms for the Unweighted Tree Augmentation Problem. In 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 371, pp. 21:1-21:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hawranick_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2026.21,
  author =	{Hawranick, Luke and Williamson, Matthew and Restanio, Jacob and Subramani, K. and Klingler, Cody},
  title =	{{An Empirical Analysis of Approximation Algorithms for the Unweighted Tree Augmentation Problem}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-422-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{371},
  editor =	{Aum\"{u}ller, Martin and Finocchi, Irene},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260259},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graphs, Networks, Tree Augmentation, Approximation Algorithms, Empirical}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.43

New Results on Cutting Plane Proofs for Horn Constraint Systems

Authors: Hans Kleine Büning, Piotr Wojciechowski, and K. Subramani

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 150, 39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate properties of cutting plane based refutations for a class of integer programs called Horn constraint systems (HCS). Briefly, a system of linear inequalities A * x >= b is called a Horn constraint system, if each entry in A belongs to the set {0,1,-1} and furthermore there is at most one positive entry per row. Our focus is on deriving refutations i.e., proofs of unsatisfiability of such programs using cutting planes as a proof system. We also look at several properties of these refutations. Horn constraint systems can be considered as a more general form of propositional Horn formulas, i.e., CNF formulas with at most one positive literal per clause. Cutting plane calculus (CP) is a well-known calculus for deciding the unsatisfiability of propositional CNF formulas and integer programs. Usually, CP consists of a pair of inference rules. These are called the addition rule (ADD) and the division rule (DIV). In this paper, we show that cutting plane calculus is still complete for Horn constraints when every intermediate constraint is required to be Horn. We also investigate the lengths of cutting plane proofs for Horn constraint systems.

Cite as

Hans Kleine Büning, Piotr Wojciechowski, and K. Subramani. New Results on Cutting Plane Proofs for Horn Constraint Systems. In 39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 150, pp. 43:1-43:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kleinebuning_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.43,
  author =	{Kleine B\"{u}ning, Hans and Wojciechowski, Piotr and Subramani, K.},
  title =	{{New Results on Cutting Plane Proofs for Horn Constraint Systems}},
  booktitle =	{39th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2019)},
  pages =	{43:1--43:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-131-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{150},
  editor =	{Chattopadhyay, Arkadev and Gastin, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.43},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-116056},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2019.43},
  annote =	{Keywords: Horn constraints, cutting planes, proof length}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Subramani, K.

An Empirical Analysis of Approximation Algorithms for the Unweighted Tree Augmentation Problem

Abstract

Cite as

New Results on Cutting Plane Proofs for Horn Constraint Systems

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message