1 Search Results for "Ceresa, Martín"

Multi: A Formal Playground for Multi-Smart Contract Interaction

Authors: Martín Ceresa and César Sánchez

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 105, 4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022)

Blockchains are maintained by a network of participants, miner nodes, that run algorithms designed to maintain collectively a distributed machine tolerant to Byzantine attacks. From the point of view of users, blockchains provide the illusion of centralized computers that perform trustable verifiable computations, where all computations are deterministic and the results cannot be manipulated or undone. Every blockchain is equipped with a crypto-currency. Programs running on blockchains are called smart-contracts and are written in a special-purpose programming language with deterministic semantics. Each transaction begins with an invocation from an external user to a smart contract. Smart contracts have local storage and can call other contracts, and more importantly, they store, send and receive cryptocurrency. Once installed in a blockchain, the code of the smart-contract cannot be modified. Therefore, it is very important to guarantee that contracts are correct before deployment. However, the resulting ecosystem makes it very difficult to reason about program correctness, since smart-contracts can be executed by malicious users or malicious smart-contracts can be designed to exploit other contracts that call them. Many attacks and bugs are caused by unexpected interactions between multiple contracts, the attacked contract and unknown code that performs the exploit. Moreover, there is a very aggressive competition between different blockchains to expand their user base. Ideas are implemented fast and blockchains compete to offer and adopt new features quickly. In this paper, we propose a formal playground that allows reasoning about multi-contract interactions and is extensible to incorporate new features, study their behaviour and ultimately prove properties before features are incorporated into the real blockchain. We implemented a model of computation that models the execution platform, abstracts the internal code of each individual contract and focuses on contract interactions. Even though our Coq implementation is still a work in progress, we show how many features, existing or proposed, can be used to reason about multi-contract interactions.

Cite as

Martín Ceresa and César Sánchez. Multi: A Formal Playground for Multi-Smart Contract Interaction. In 4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 105, pp. 5:1-5:16, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

  author =	{Ceresa, Mart{\'\i}n and S\'{a}nchez, C\'{e}sar},
  title =	{{Multi: A Formal Playground for Multi-Smart Contract Interaction}},
  booktitle =	{4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:16},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-250-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{105},
  editor =	{Dargaye, Zaynah and Schneidewind, Clara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-171868},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: blockchain, formal methods, theorem prover, smart-contracts}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Ceresa, Martín
  • 1 Sánchez, César

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Abstract machines
  • 1 Theory of computation → Program constructs
  • 1 Theory of computation → Program reasoning

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 blockchain
  • 1 formal methods
  • 1 smart-contracts
  • 1 theorem prover

  • Refine by Type
  • 1 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2022

Questions / Remarks / Feedback

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail