7 Search Results for "Hoffmann, Henry"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.10
Anytime Weighted Model Counting with Approximation Guarantees for Probabilistic Inference

Authors: Alexandre Dubray, Pierre Schaus, and Siegfried Nijssen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 307, 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024)

Abstract
Weighted model counting (WMC) plays a central role in probabilistic reasoning. Given that this problem is #P-hard, harder instances can generally only be addressed using approximate techniques based on sampling, which provide statistical convergence guarantees: the longer a sampling process runs, the more accurate the WMC is likely to be. In this work, we propose a deterministic search-based approach that can also be stopped at any time and provides hard lower- and upper-bound guarantees on the true WMC. This approach uses a value heuristic that guides exploration first towards models with a high weight and leverages Limited Discrepancy Search to make the bounds converge faster. The validity, scalability, and convergence of our approach are tested and compared with state-of-the-art baseline methods on the problem of computing marginal probabilities in Bayesian networks and reliability estimation in probabilistic graphs.
Cite as

Alexandre Dubray, Pierre Schaus, and Siegfried Nijssen. Anytime Weighted Model Counting with Approximation Guarantees for Probabilistic Inference. In 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 307, pp. 10:1-10:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dubray_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2024.10,
  author =	{Dubray, Alexandre and Schaus, Pierre and Nijssen, Siegfried},
  title =	{{Anytime Weighted Model Counting with Approximation Guarantees for Probabilistic Inference}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-336-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{307},
  editor =	{Shaw, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-206956},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Projected Weighted Model Counting, Limited Discrepancy Search, Approximate Method, Probabilistic Inference}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.12
Using Constraint Programming for Disjunctive Scheduling in Temporal AI Planning

Authors: Adam Francis Green, J. Christopher Beck, and Amanda Coles

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 307, 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024)

Abstract
We present a novel scheduling model that leverages Constraint Programming (CP) to enhance problem solving performance in Temporal Planning. Building on the established strategy of decomposing causal and temporal reasoning, our approach abstracts two common fact structures present in many Temporal Planning problems - Semaphores and Envelopes - and performs temporal reasoning in a CP-based scheduler. At each search node in a heuristic search for a temporal plan, we construct and solve a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) and integrate feedback from the CP-based scheduler to guide the causal planning search towards a solution. Through experimental analysis, we validate the impact of these advances, demonstrating a significant reduction in both the number of states searched and in search time alongside an increase in problem-solving coverage.
Cite as

Adam Francis Green, J. Christopher Beck, and Amanda Coles. Using Constraint Programming for Disjunctive Scheduling in Temporal AI Planning. In 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 307, pp. 12:1-12:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{francisgreen_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2024.12,
  author =	{Francis Green, Adam and Beck, J. Christopher and Coles, Amanda},
  title =	{{Using Constraint Programming for Disjunctive Scheduling in Temporal AI Planning}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-336-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{307},
  editor =	{Shaw, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-206974},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: AI Planning, Temporal-Numeric Planning, Constraint Programming, Scheduling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.27
Polynomial Calculus for Quantified Boolean Logic: Lower Bounds Through Circuits and Degree

Authors: Olaf Beyersdorff, Tim Hoffmann, Kaspar Kasche, and Luc Nicolas Spachmann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 306, 49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024)

Abstract
We initiate an in-depth proof-complexity analysis of polynomial calculus (𝒬-PC) for Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF). In the course of this we establish a tight proof-size characterisation of 𝒬-PC in terms of a suitable circuit model (polynomial decision lists). Using this correspondence we show a size-degree relation for 𝒬-PC, similar in spirit, yet different from the classic size-degree formula for propositional PC by Impagliazzo, Pudlák and Sgall (1999). We use the circuit characterisation together with the size-degree relation to obtain various new lower bounds on proof size in 𝒬-PC. This leads to incomparability results for 𝒬-PC systems over different fields.
Cite as

Olaf Beyersdorff, Tim Hoffmann, Kaspar Kasche, and Luc Nicolas Spachmann. Polynomial Calculus for Quantified Boolean Logic: Lower Bounds Through Circuits and Degree. In 49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 306, pp. 27:1-27:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beyersdorff_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.27,
  author =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Hoffmann, Tim and Kasche, Kaspar and Spachmann, Luc Nicolas},
  title =	{{Polynomial Calculus for Quantified Boolean Logic: Lower Bounds Through Circuits and Degree}},
  booktitle =	{49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-335-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{306},
  editor =	{Kr\'{a}lovi\v{c}, Rastislav and Ku\v{c}era, Anton{\'\i}n},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205834},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, QBF, polynomial calculus, circuits, lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.5
The Relative Strength of #SAT Proof Systems

Authors: Olaf Beyersdorff, Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Tim Hoffmann, and Kaspar Kasche

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 305, 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)

Abstract
The propositional model counting problem #SAT asks to compute the number of satisfying assignments for a given propositional formula. Recently, three #SAT proof systems kcps (knowledge compilation proof system), MICE (model counting induction by claim extension), and CPOG (certified partitioned-operation graphs) have been introduced with the aim to model #SAT solving and enable proof logging for solvers. Prior to this paper, the relations between these proof systems have been unclear and very few proof complexity results are known. We completely determine the simulation order of the three systems, establishing that CPOG simulates both MICE and kcps, while MICE and kcps are exponentially incomparable. This implies that CPOG is strictly stronger than the other two systems.
Cite as

Olaf Beyersdorff, Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Tim Hoffmann, and Kaspar Kasche. The Relative Strength of #SAT Proof Systems. In 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 305, pp. 5:1-5:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beyersdorff_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2024.5,
  author =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Fichte, Johannes K. and Hecher, Markus and Hoffmann, Tim and Kasche, Kaspar},
  title =	{{The Relative Strength of #SAT Proof Systems}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-334-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{305},
  editor =	{Chakraborty, Supratik and Jiang, Jie-Hong Roland},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205276},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Model Counting, #SAT, Proof Complexity, Proof Systems, Lower Bounds, Knowledge Compilation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1
Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)

Authors: James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Frank Wolter

Published in: Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2024)

Abstract
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning is a central, longstanding, and active area of Artificial Intelligence. Over the years it has evolved significantly; more recently it has been challenged and complemented by research in areas such as machine learning and reasoning under uncertainty. In July 2022,sser a Dagstuhl Perspectives workshop was held on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. The goal of the workshop was to describe the state of the art in the field, including its relation with other areas, its shortcomings and strengths, together with recommendations for future progress. We developed this manifesto based on the presentations, panels, working groups, and discussions that took place at the Dagstuhl Workshop. It is a declaration of our views on Knowledge Representation: its origins, goals, milestones, and current foci; its relation to other disciplines, especially to Artificial Intelligence; and on its challenges, along with key priorities for the next decade.
Cite as

James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Frank Wolter. Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 1-61, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{delgrande_et_al:DagMan.10.1.1,
  author =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Wolter, Frank},
  title =	{{Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)}},
  pages =	{1--61},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Manifestos},
  ISSN =	{2193-2433},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Wolter, Frank},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201403},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge representation and reasoning, Applications of logics, Declarative representations, Formal logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2018.25
Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling with Resource and Precedence Constraints

Authors: Gökalp Demirci, Henry Hoffmann, and David H. K. Kim

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 96, 35th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2018)

Abstract
We study non-preemptive scheduling problems on identical parallel machines and uniformly related machines under both resource constraints and general precedence constraints between jobs. Our first result is an O(logn)-approximation algorithm for the objective of minimizing the makespan on parallel identical machines under resource and general precedence constraints. We then use this result as a subroutine to obtain an O(logn)-approximation algorithm for the more general objective of minimizing the total weighted completion time on parallel identical machines under both constraints. Finally, we present an O(logm logn)-approximation algorithm for scheduling under these constraints on uniformly related machines. We show that these results can all be generalized to include the case where each job has a release time. This is the first upper bound on the approximability of this class of scheduling problems where both resource and general precedence constraints must be satisfied simultaneously.
Cite as

Gökalp Demirci, Henry Hoffmann, and David H. K. Kim. Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling with Resource and Precedence Constraints. In 35th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 96, pp. 25:1-25:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{demirci_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2018.25,
  author =	{Demirci, G\"{o}kalp and Hoffmann, Henry and Kim, David H. K.},
  title =	{{Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling with Resource and Precedence Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{35th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2018)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-062-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{96},
  editor =	{Niedermeier, Rolf and Vall\'{e}e, Brigitte},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2018.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-85319},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2018.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: scheduling, resource, precedence, weighted completion time}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.3.1.2
Self-Adaptive Video Encoder: Comparison of Multiple Adaptation Strategies Made Simple (Artifact)

Authors: Martina Maggio, Alessandro Vittorio Papadopoulos, Antonio Filieri, and Henry Hoffmann

Published in: DARTS, Volume 3, Issue 1, Special Issue of the 12th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS 2017)

Abstract
This paper presents an adaptive video encoder that can be used to compare the behavior of different adaptation strategies using multiple actuators to steer the encoder towards a global goal, composed of multiple conflicting objectives. A video camera produces frames that the encoder manipulates with the objective of matching some space requirement to fit a given communication channel. A second objective is to maintain a given similarity index between the manipulated frames and the original ones. To achieve the goal, the software can change three parameters: the quality of the encoding, the noise reduction filter radius and the sharpening filter radius. In most cases the objectives - small encoded size and high quality - conflict, since a larger frame would have a higher similarity index to its original counterpart. This makes the problem difficult from the control perspective and makes the case study appealing to compare different adaptation strategies.
Cite as

Martina Maggio, Alessandro Vittorio Papadopoulos, Antonio Filieri, and Henry Hoffmann. Self-Adaptive Video Encoder: Comparison of Multiple Adaptation Strategies Made Simple (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 12th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS 2017). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 2:1-2:3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{maggio_et_al:DARTS.3.1.2,
  author =	{Maggio, Martina and Papadopoulos, Alessandro Vittorio and Filieri, Antonio and Hoffmann, Henry},
  title =	{{Self-Adaptive Video Encoder: Comparison of Multiple Adaptation Strategies Made Simple (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{2:1--2:3},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Maggio, Martina and Papadopoulos, Alessandro Vittorio and Filieri, Antonio and Hoffmann, Henry},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.3.1.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-71408},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.3.1.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: self-adaptive software, video encoding, comparison, control theory}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Beyersdorff, Olaf
  • 2 Hoffmann, Henry
  • 2 Hoffmann, Tim
  • 2 Kasche, Kaspar
  • 1 Beck, J. Christopher
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Proof complexity
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Planning and scheduling
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Search methodologies
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 #SAT
  • 1 AI Planning
  • 1 Applications of logics
  • 1 Approximate Method
  • 1 Constraint Programming
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 7 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 5 2024
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2018

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact