4 Search Results for "Kaplan, Marc"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES.10.1.2
Towards a Coq-verified Chain of Esterel Semantics

Authors: Lionel Rieg and Gérard Berry

Published in: LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract
This article focuses on formally specifying and verifying the chain of formal semantics of the Esterel synchronous programming language using the Coq proof assistant. In particular, in addition to the standard logical (LBS) semantics, constructive semantics (CBS) and constructive state semantics (CSS), we introduce a novel microstep semantics that gets rid of the Must/Can potential function pair of the constructive semantics and can be viewed as an abstract version of Esterel’s circuit semantics used by compilers to generate software code and hardware designs. The article also comes with formal proofs in Coq of the equivalence between the CBS and CSS semantics and of the refinement of the CSS by the microstep semantics, except for the loop construct of Esterel.
Cite as

Lionel Rieg and Gérard Berry. Towards a Coq-verified Chain of Esterel Semantics. In LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 2:1-2:54, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{rieg_et_al:LITES.10.1.2,
  author =	{Rieg, Lionel and Berry, G\'{e}rard},
  title =	{{Towards a Coq-verified Chain of Esterel Semantics}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{2:1--2:54},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES.10.1.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230144},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES.10.1.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Esterel programming language, formal verification, Coq proof assistant}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.6
Complexity-Theoretic Limitations on Blind Delegated Quantum Computation

Authors: Scott Aaronson, Alexandru Cojocaru, Alexandru Gheorghiu, and Elham Kashefi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 132, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)

Abstract
Blind delegation protocols allow a client to delegate a computation to a server so that the server learns nothing about the input to the computation apart from its size. For the specific case of quantum computation we know, from work over the past decade, that blind delegation protocols can achieve information-theoretic security (provided the client and the server exchange some amount of quantum information). In this paper we prove, provided certain complexity-theoretic conjectures are true, that the power of information-theoretically secure blind delegation protocols for quantum computation (ITS-BQC protocols) is in a number of ways constrained. In the first part of our paper we provide some indication that ITS-BQC protocols for delegating polynomial-time quantum computations in which the client and the server interact only classically are unlikely to exist. We first show that having such a protocol in which the client and the server exchange O(n^d) bits of communication, implies that BQP subset MA/O(n^d). We conjecture that this containment is unlikely by proving that there exists an oracle relative to which BQP not subset MA/O(n^d). We then show that if an ITS-BQC protocol exists in which the client and the server interact only classically and which allows the client to delegate quantum sampling problems to the server (such as BosonSampling) then there exist non-uniform circuits of size 2^{n - Omega(n/log(n))}, making polynomially-sized queries to an NP^{NP} oracle, for computing the permanent of an n x n matrix. The second part of our paper concerns ITS-BQC protocols in which the client and the server engage in one round of quantum communication and then exchange polynomially many classical messages. First, we provide a complexity-theoretic upper bound on the types of functions that could be delegated in such a protocol by showing that they must be contained in QCMA/qpoly cap coQCMA/qpoly. Then, we show that having such a protocol for delegating NP-hard functions implies coNP^{NP^{NP}} subseteq NP^{NP^{PromiseQMA}}.
Cite as

Scott Aaronson, Alexandru Cojocaru, Alexandru Gheorghiu, and Elham Kashefi. Complexity-Theoretic Limitations on Blind Delegated Quantum Computation. In 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 132, pp. 6:1-6:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aaronson_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.6,
  author =	{Aaronson, Scott and Cojocaru, Alexandru and Gheorghiu, Alexandru and Kashefi, Elham},
  title =	{{Complexity-Theoretic Limitations on Blind Delegated Quantum Computation}},
  booktitle =	{46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-109-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{132},
  editor =	{Baier, Christel and Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Flocchini, Paola and Leonardi, Stefano},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-105826},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum cryptography, Complexity theory, Delegated quantum computation, Computing on encrypted data}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2017.3
Provably Secure Key Establishment Against Quantum Adversaries

Authors: Aleksandrs Belovs, Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer, Marc Kaplan, Sophie Laplante, and Louis Salvail

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 73, 12th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2017)

Abstract
At Crypto 2011, some of us had proposed a family of cryptographic protocols for key establishment capable of protecting quantum and classical legitimate parties unconditionally against a quantum eavesdropper in the query complexity model. Unfortunately, our security proofs were unsatisfactory from a cryptographically meaningful perspective because they were sound only in a worst-case scenario. Here, we extend our results and prove that for any \eps > 0, there is a classical protocol that allows the legitimate parties to establish a common key after O(N) expected queries to a random oracle, yet any quantum eavesdropper will have a vanishing probability of learning their key after O(N^(1.5-\eps)) queries to the same oracle. The vanishing probability applies to a typical run of the protocol. If we allow the legitimate parties to use a quantum computer as well, their advantage over the quantum eavesdropper becomes arbitrarily close to the quadratic advantage that classical legitimate parties enjoyed over classical eavesdroppers in the seminal 1974 work of Ralph Merkle. Along the way, we develop new tools to give lower bounds on the number of quantum queries required to distinguish two probability distributions. This method in itself could have multiple applications in cryptography. We use it here to study average-case quantum query complexity, for which we develop a new composition theorem of independent interest.
Cite as

Aleksandrs Belovs, Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer, Marc Kaplan, Sophie Laplante, and Louis Salvail. Provably Secure Key Establishment Against Quantum Adversaries. In 12th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 73, pp. 3:1-3:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{belovs_et_al:LIPIcs.TQC.2017.3,
  author =	{Belovs, Aleksandrs and Brassard, Gilles and H{\o}yer, Peter and Kaplan, Marc and Laplante, Sophie and Salvail, Louis},
  title =	{{Provably Secure Key Establishment Against Quantum Adversaries}},
  booktitle =	{12th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2017)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-034-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{73},
  editor =	{Wilde, Mark M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2017.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-85816},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2017.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Merkle puzzles, Key establishment schemes, Quantum cryptography, Adversary method, Average-case analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2322
Non-Local Box Complexity and Secure Function Evaluation

Authors: Marc Kaplan, Iordanis Kerenidis, Sophie Laplante, and Jérémie Roland

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 4, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (2009)

Abstract
A non-local box is an abstract device into which Alice and Bob input bits $x$ and $y$ respectively and receive outputs $a$ and $b$ respectively, where $a,b$ are uniformly distributed and $a \oplus b = x \wedge y$. Such boxes have been central to the study of quantum or generalized non-locality as well as the simulation of non-signaling distributions. In this paper, we start by studying how many non-local boxes Alice and Bob need in order to compute a Boolean function $f$. We provide tight upper and lower bounds in terms of the communication complexity of the function both in the deterministic and randomized case. We show that non-local box complexity has interesting applications to classical cryptography, in particular to secure function evaluation, and study the question posed by Beimel and Malkin \cite{BM} of how many Oblivious Transfer calls Alice and Bob need in order to securely compute a function $f$. We show that this question is related to the non-local box complexity of the function and conclude by greatly improving their bounds. Finally, another consequence of our results is that traceless two-outcome measurements on maximally entangled states can be simulated with 3 \nlbs, while no finite bound was previously known.
Cite as

Marc Kaplan, Iordanis Kerenidis, Sophie Laplante, and Jérémie Roland. Non-Local Box Complexity and Secure Function Evaluation. In IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 4, pp. 239-250, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kaplan_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2322,
  author =	{Kaplan, Marc and Kerenidis, Iordanis and Laplante, Sophie and Roland, J\'{e}r\'{e}mie},
  title =	{{Non-Local Box Complexity and Secure Function Evaluation}},
  booktitle =	{IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science},
  pages =	{239--250},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-13-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{4},
  editor =	{Kannan, Ravi and Narayan Kumar, K.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2322},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-23226},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2322},
  annote =	{Keywords: Communication complexity, non-locality, non-local boxes, secure function evaluation}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Kaplan, Marc
  • 2 Laplante, Sophie
  • 1 Aaronson, Scott
  • 1 Belovs, Aleksandrs
  • 1 Berry, Gérard
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Quantum cryptography
  • 1 Adversary method
  • 1 Average-case analysis
  • 1 Communication complexity
  • 1 Complexity theory
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 4 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2009
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2019
  • 1 2025

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact