2 Search Results for "Lööw, Andreas"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2023.19
Exact Separation Logic: Towards Bridging the Gap Between Verification and Bug-Finding

Authors: Petar Maksimović, Caroline Cronjäger, Andreas Lööw, Julian Sutherland, and Philippa Gardner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 263, 37th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2023)

Abstract
Over-approximating (OX) program logics, such as separation logic (SL), are used for verifying properties of heap-manipulating programs: all terminating behaviour is characterised, but established results and errors need not be reachable. OX function specifications are thus incompatible with true bug-finding supported by symbolic execution tools such as Pulse and Pulse-X. In contrast, under-approximating (UX) program logics, such as incorrectness separation logic, are used to find true results and bugs: established results and errors are reachable, but there is no mechanism for understanding if all terminating behaviour has been characterised. We introduce exact separation logic (ESL), which provides fully-verified function specifications compatible with both OX verification and UX true bug-funding: all terminating behaviour is characterised and all established results and errors are reachable. We prove soundness for ESL with mutually recursive functions, demonstrating, for the first time, function compositionality for a UX logic. We show that UX program logics require subtle definitions of internal and external function specifications compared with the familiar definitions of OX logics. We investigate the expressivity of ESL and, for the first time, explore the role of abstraction in UX reasoning by verifying abstract ESL specifications of various data-structure algorithms. In doing so, we highlight the difference between abstraction (hiding information) and over-approximation (losing information). Our findings demonstrate that abstraction cannot be used as freely in UX logics as in OX logics, but also that it should be feasible to use ESL to provide tractable function specifications for self-contained, critical code, which would then be used for both verification and true bug-finding.
Cite as

Petar Maksimović, Caroline Cronjäger, Andreas Lööw, Julian Sutherland, and Philippa Gardner. Exact Separation Logic: Towards Bridging the Gap Between Verification and Bug-Finding. In 37th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 263, pp. 19:1-19:27, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{maksimovic_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2023.19,
  author =	{Maksimovi\'{c}, Petar and Cronj\"{a}ger, Caroline and L\"{o}\"{o}w, Andreas and Sutherland, Julian and Gardner, Philippa},
  title =	{{Exact Separation Logic: Towards Bridging the Gap Between Verification and Bug-Finding}},
  booktitle =	{37th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2023)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-281-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{263},
  editor =	{Ali, Karim and Salvaneschi, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2023.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-182123},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2023.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Separation logic, program correctness, program incorrectness, abstraction}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.1
The CakeML Project’s Quest for Ever Stronger Correctness Theorems (Invited Paper)

Authors: Magnus O. Myreen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 193, 12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021)

Abstract
The CakeML project has developed a proof-producing code generation mechanism for the HOL4 theorem prover, a verified compiler for ML and, using these, a number of verified application programs that are proved correct down to the machine code that runs them (in some cases, even down to the underlying hardware). The purpose of this extended abstract is to tell the story of the project and to point curious readers to publications where they can read more about specific contributions.
Cite as

Magnus O. Myreen. The CakeML Project’s Quest for Ever Stronger Correctness Theorems (Invited Paper). In 12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 193, pp. 1:1-1:10, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{myreen:LIPIcs.ITP.2021.1,
  author =	{Myreen, Magnus O.},
  title =	{{The CakeML Project’s Quest for Ever Stronger Correctness Theorems}},
  booktitle =	{12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-188-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{193},
  editor =	{Cohen, Liron and Kaliszyk, Cezary},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138963},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program verification, interactive theorem proving}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Cronjäger, Caroline
  • 1 Gardner, Philippa
  • 1 Lööw, Andreas
  • 1 Maksimović, Petar
  • 1 Myreen, Magnus O.
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Abstraction
  • 1 Theory of computation → Higher order logic
  • 1 Theory of computation → Hoare logic
  • 1 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Program reasoning
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Program verification
  • 1 Separation logic
  • 1 abstraction
  • 1 interactive theorem proving
  • 1 program correctness
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 2 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2023

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023 Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact