3 Search Results for "Ogata, Kazuhiro"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES.8.2.2
Swarms of Mobile Robots: Towards Versatility with Safety

Authors: Pierre Courtieu, Lionel Rieg, Sébastien Tixeuil, and Xavier Urbain

Published in: LITES, Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022): Special Issue on Distributed Hybrid Systems. Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 8, Issue 2

Abstract
We present Pactole, a formal framework to design and prove the correctness of protocols (or the impossibility of their existence) that target mobile robotic swarms. Unlike previous approaches, our methodology unifies in a single formalism the execution model, the problem specification, the protocol, and its proof of correctness. The Pactole framework makes use of the Coq proof assistant, and is specially targeted at protocol designers and problem specifiers, so that a common unambiguous language is used from the very early stages of protocol development. We stress the underlying framework design principles to enable high expressivity and modularity, and provide concrete examples about how the Pactole framework can be used to tackle actual problems, some previously addressed by the Distributed Computing community, but also new problems, while being certified correct.
Cite as

Pierre Courtieu, Lionel Rieg, Sébastien Tixeuil, and Xavier Urbain. Swarms of Mobile Robots: Towards Versatility with Safety. In LITES, Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022): Special Issue on Distributed Hybrid Systems. Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 02:1-02:36, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{courtieu_et_al:LITES.8.2.2,
  author =	{Courtieu, Pierre and Rieg, Lionel and Tixeuil, S\'{e}bastien and Urbain, Xavier},
  title =	{{Swarms of Mobile Robots: Towards Versatility with Safety}},
  booktitle =	{LITES, Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022): Special Issue on Distributed Hybrid Systems},
  pages =	{02:1--02:36},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{8},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Courtieu, Pierre and Rieg, Lionel and Tixeuil, S\'{e}bastien and Urbain, Xavier},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES.8.2.2},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES.8.2.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: distributed algorithm, mobile autonomous robots, formal proof}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.12
Model Checking of Robot Gathering

Authors: Ha Thi Thu Doan, François Bonnet, and Kazuhiro Ogata

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 95, 21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017)

Abstract
Recent advances in distributed computing highlight models and algorithms for autonomous mo- bile robots that self-organize and cooperate together in order to solve a global objective. As results, a large number of algorithms have been proposed. These algorithms are given together with proofs to assess their correctness. However, those proofs are informal, which are error prone. This paper presents our study on formal verification of mobile robot algorithms. We first propose a formal model for mobile robot algorithms on anonymous ring shape network under multiplicity and asynchrony assumptions. We specify this formal model in Maude, a specification and pro- gramming language based on rewriting logic. We then use its model checker to formally verify an algorithm for robot gathering problem on ring enjoys some desired properties. As the result of the model checking, counterexamples have been found. We detect the sources of some unforeseen design errors. We, furthermore, give our interpretations of these errors.
Cite as

Ha Thi Thu Doan, François Bonnet, and Kazuhiro Ogata. Model Checking of Robot Gathering. In 21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 95, pp. 12:1-12:16, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{doan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.12,
  author =	{Doan, Ha Thi Thu and Bonnet, Fran\c{c}ois and Ogata, Kazuhiro},
  title =	{{Model Checking of Robot Gathering}},
  booktitle =	{21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-061-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{95},
  editor =	{Aspnes, James and Bessani, Alysson and Felber, Pascal and Leit\~{a}o, Jo\~{a}o},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-86324},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2017.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mobile Robot, Robot Gathering, Formal Verification, Model Checking, Maude}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES-v004-i001-a003
Quantitative Analysis of Consistency in NoSQL Key-Value Stores

Authors: Si Liu, Jatin Ganhotra, Muntasir Raihan Rahman, Son Nguyen, Indranil Gupta, and José Meseguer

Published in: LITES, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract
The promise of high scalability and availability has prompted many companies to replace traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) with NoSQL key-value stores. This comes at the cost of relaxed consistency guarantees: key-value stores only guarantee eventual consistency in principle. In practice, however, many key-value stores seem to offer stronger consistency. Quantifying how well consistency properties are met is a non-trivial problem.  We address this problem by formally modeling key-value stores as probabilistic systems and quantitatively analyzing their consistency properties by both statistical model checking and implementation evaluation. We present for the first time a formal probabilistic model of Apache Cassandra, a popular NoSQL key-value store, and quantify how much Cassandra achieves various consistency guarantees under various conditions. To validate our model, we evaluate multiple consistency properties using two methods and compare them against each other. The two methods are: (1) an implementation-based evaluation of the source code; and (2) a statistical model checking analysis of our probabilistic model.
Cite as

Si Liu, Jatin Ganhotra, Muntasir Raihan Rahman, Son Nguyen, Indranil Gupta, and José Meseguer. Quantitative Analysis of Consistency in NoSQL Key-Value Stores. In LITES, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 03:1-03:26, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{liu_et_al:LITES-v004-i001-a003,
  author =	{Liu, Si and Ganhotra, Jatin and Rahman, Muntasir Raihan and Nguyen, Son and Gupta, Indranil and Meseguer, Jos\'{e}},
  title =	{{Quantitative Analysis of Consistency in NoSQL Key-Value Stores}},
  booktitle =	{LITES, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017)},
  pages =	{03:1--03:26},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Liu, Si and Ganhotra, Jatin and Rahman, Muntasir Raihan and Nguyen, Son and Gupta, Indranil and Meseguer, Jos\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES-v004-i001-a003},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES-v004-i001-a003},
  annote =	{Keywords: NoSQL Key-value Store, Consistency, Statistical Model Checking, Rewriting Logic, Maude}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Bonnet, François
  • 1 Courtieu, Pierre
  • 1 Doan, Ha Thi Thu
  • 1 Ganhotra, Jatin
  • 1 Gupta, Indranil
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Cloud computing
  • 1 Information systems → Key-value stores
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Formal methods
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Model checking
  • 1 Theory of computation → Distributed computing models
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Maude
  • 1 Consistency
  • 1 Formal Verification
  • 1 Mobile Robot
  • 1 Model Checking
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 3 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2022

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023 Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact