4 Search Results for "Tönnis, Andreas"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2019.1
Submodular Secretary Problem with Shortlists

Authors: Shipra Agrawal, Mohammad Shadravan, and Cliff Stein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 124, 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2019)

Abstract
In submodular k-secretary problem, the goal is to select k items in a randomly ordered input so as to maximize the expected value of a given monotone submodular function on the set of selected items. In this paper, we introduce a relaxation of this problem, which we refer to as submodular k-secretary problem with shortlists. In the proposed problem setting, the algorithm is allowed to choose more than k items as part of a shortlist. Then, after seeing the entire input, the algorithm can choose a subset of size k from the bigger set of items in the shortlist. We are interested in understanding to what extent this relaxation can improve the achievable competitive ratio for the submodular k-secretary problem. In particular, using an O(k) sized shortlist, can an online algorithm achieve a competitive ratio close to the best achievable offline approximation factor for this problem? We answer this question affirmatively by giving a polynomial time algorithm that achieves a 1-1/e-epsilon-O(k^{-1}) competitive ratio for any constant epsilon>0, using a shortlist of size eta_epsilon(k)=O(k). This is especially surprising considering that the best known competitive ratio (in polynomial time) for the submodular k-secretary problem is (1/e-O(k^{-1/2}))(1-1/e) [Thomas Kesselheim and Andreas Tönnis, 2017]. The proposed algorithm also has significant implications for another important problem of submodular function maximization under random order streaming model and k-cardinality constraint. We show that our algorithm can be implemented in the streaming setting using a memory buffer of size eta_epsilon(k)=O(k) to achieve a 1-1/e-epsilon-O(k^{-1}) approximation. This result substantially improves upon [Norouzi-Fard et al., 2018], which achieved the previously best known approximation factor of 1/2 + 8 x 10^{-14} using O(k log k) memory; and closely matches the known upper bound for this problem [McGregor and Vu, 2017].
Cite as

Shipra Agrawal, Mohammad Shadravan, and Cliff Stein. Submodular Secretary Problem with Shortlists. In 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 124, pp. 1:1-1:19, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{agrawal_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2019.1,
  author =	{Agrawal, Shipra and Shadravan, Mohammad and Stein, Cliff},
  title =	{{Submodular Secretary Problem with Shortlists}},
  booktitle =	{10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2019)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-095-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{124},
  editor =	{Blum, Avrim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2019.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-100949},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2019.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Submodular Optimization, Secretary Problem, Streaming Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2018.12
SUPERSET: A (Super)Natural Variant of the Card Game SET

Authors: Fábio Botler, Andrés Cristi, Ruben Hoeksma, Kevin Schewior, and Andreas Tönnis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 100, 9th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2018)

Abstract
We consider Superset, a lesser-known yet interesting variant of the famous card game Set. Here, players look for Supersets instead of Sets, that is, the symmetric difference of two Sets that intersect in exactly one card. In this paper, we pose questions that have been previously posed for Set and provide answers to them; we also show relations between Set and Superset. For the regular Set deck, which can be identified with F^3_4, we give a proof for the fact that the maximum number of cards that can be on the table without having a Superset is 9. This solves an open question posed by McMahon et al. in 2016. For the deck corresponding to F^3_d, we show that this number is Omega(1.442^d) and O(1.733^d). We also compute probabilities of the presence of a superset in a collection of cards drawn uniformly at random. Finally, we consider the computational complexity of deciding whether a multi-value version of Set or Superset is contained in a given set of cards, and show an FPT-reduction from the problem for Set to that for Superset, implying W[1]-hardness of the problem for Superset.
Cite as

Fábio Botler, Andrés Cristi, Ruben Hoeksma, Kevin Schewior, and Andreas Tönnis. SUPERSET: A (Super)Natural Variant of the Card Game SET. In 9th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 100, pp. 12:1-12:17, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{botler_et_al:LIPIcs.FUN.2018.12,
  author =	{Botler, F\'{a}bio and Cristi, Andr\'{e}s and Hoeksma, Ruben and Schewior, Kevin and T\"{o}nnis, Andreas},
  title =	{{SUPERSET: A (Super)Natural Variant of the Card Game SET}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2018)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-067-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{100},
  editor =	{Ito, Hiro and Leonardi, Stefano and Pagli, Linda and Prencipe, Giuseppe},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2018.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-88035},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2018.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: SET, SUPERSET, card game, cap set, affine geometry, computational complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2017.16
Submodular Secretary Problems: Cardinality, Matching, and Linear Constraints

Authors: Thomas Kesselheim and Andreas Tönnis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 81, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2017)

Abstract
We study various generalizations of the secretary problem with submodular objective functions. Generally, a set of requests is revealed step-by-step to an algorithm in random order. For each request, one option has to be selected so as to maximize a monotone submodular function while ensuring feasibility. For our results, we assume that we are given an offline algorithm computing an alpha-approximation for the respective problem. This way, we separate computational limitations from the ones due to the online nature. When only focusing on the online aspect, we can assume alpha = 1. In the submodular secretary problem, feasibility constraints are cardinality constraints, or equivalently, sets are feasible if and only if they are independent sets of a k-uniform matroid. That is, out of a randomly ordered stream of entities, one has to select a subset of size k. For this problem, we present a 0.31alpha-competitive algorithm for all k, which asymptotically reaches competitive ratio alpha/e for large k. In submodular secretary matching, one side of a bipartite graph is revealed online. Upon arrival, each node has to be matched permanently to an offline node or discarded irrevocably. We give a 0.207alpha-competitive algorithm. This also covers the problem, in which sets of entities are feasible if and only if they are independent with respect to a transversal matroid. In both cases, we improve over previously best known competitive ratios, using a generalization of the algorithm for the classic secretary problem. Furthermore, we give an O(alpha d^(-2/(B-1)))-competitive algorithm for submodular function maximization subject to linear packing constraints. Here, d is the column sparsity, that is the maximal number of none-zero entries in a column of the constraint matrix, and B is the minimal capacity of the constraints. Notably, this bound is independent of the total number of constraints. We improve the algorithm to be O(alpha d^(-1/(B-1)))-competitive if both d and B are known to the algorithm beforehand.
Cite as

Thomas Kesselheim and Andreas Tönnis. Submodular Secretary Problems: Cardinality, Matching, and Linear Constraints. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 81, pp. 16:1-16:22, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kesselheim_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2017.16,
  author =	{Kesselheim, Thomas and T\"{o}nnis, Andreas},
  title =	{{Submodular Secretary Problems: Cardinality, Matching, and Linear Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2017)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-044-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{81},
  editor =	{Jansen, Klaus and Rolim, Jos\'{e} D. P. and Williamson, David P. and Vempala, Santosh S.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2017.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-75657},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2017.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secretary Problem, Online Algorithms, Submodular Maximization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.54
Think Eternally: Improved Algorithms for the Temp Secretary Problem and Extensions

Authors: Thomas Kesselheim and Andreas Tönnis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 57, 24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2016)

Abstract
The Temp Secretary Problem was recently introduced by [Fiat et al., ESA 2015]. It is a generalization of the Secretary Problem, in which commitments are temporary for a fixed duration. We present a simple online algorithm with improved performance guarantees for cases already considered by [Fiat et al., ESA 2015] and give competitive ratios for new generalizations of the problem. In the classical setting, where candidates have identical contract durations gamma << 1 and we are allowed to hire up to B candidates simultaneously, our algorithm is (1/2) - O(sqrt{gamma})-competitive. For large B, the bound improves to 1 - O(1/sqrt{B}) - O(sqrt{gamma}). Furthermore we generalize the problem from cardinality constraints towards general packing constraints. We achieve a competitive ratio of 1 - O(sqrt{(1+log(d) + log(B))/B}) - O(sqrt{gamma}), where d is the sparsity of the constraint matrix and B is generalized to the capacity ratio of linear constraints. Additionally we extend the problem towards arbitrary hiring durations. Our algorithmic approach is a relaxation that aggregates all temporal constraints into a non-temporal constraint. Then we apply a linear scaling algorithm that, on every arrival, computes a tentative solution on the input that is known up to this point. This tentative solution uses the non-temporal, relaxed constraints scaled down linearly by the amount of time that has already passed.
Cite as

Thomas Kesselheim and Andreas Tönnis. Think Eternally: Improved Algorithms for the Temp Secretary Problem and Extensions. In 24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 57, pp. 54:1-54:17, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kesselheim_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2016.54,
  author =	{Kesselheim, Thomas and T\"{o}nnis, Andreas},
  title =	{{Think Eternally: Improved Algorithms for the Temp Secretary Problem and Extensions}},
  booktitle =	{24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2016)},
  pages =	{54:1--54:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-015-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{57},
  editor =	{Sankowski, Piotr and Zaroliagis, Christos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.54},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63966},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.54},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secretary Problem, Online Algorithms, Scheduling Problems}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Tönnis, Andreas
  • 2 Kesselheim, Thomas
  • 1 Agrawal, Shipra
  • 1 Botler, Fábio
  • 1 Cristi, Andrés
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Combinatoric problems
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Submodular optimization and polymatroids
  • 1 Theory of computation → Fixed parameter tractability
  • 1 Theory of computation → Online algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Secretary Problem
  • 2 Online Algorithms
  • 1 SET
  • 1 SUPERSET
  • 1 Scheduling Problems
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 4 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2016
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2019

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023 Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact