11 Search Results for "Truszczynski, Miroslaw"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.12.7.62
Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Seminar 22282)

Authors: James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, Milene Santos Teixeira, and Frank Wolter

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 7 (2023)

Abstract
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR) is a central area in Artificial Intelligence that deals with the explicit, declarative representation of knowledge along with inference procedures for deriving further, implicit information from this knowledge. The goal of this Perspectives Seminar was to assess the area of KR, including its history, current state, and future prospects, and from this assessment to provide suggestions and recommendations for advancing the field, increasing participation in the area, and furthering links with related areas. Over the course of 5 days, 25 participants from a cross-section of subareas in KR and areas adjacent to KR met to discuss these topics. The workshop was composed of a number of invited talks and panels for reviewing the history and state of the art of KR, along with several working groups and general open discussions. In common with other Perspectives Workshops, a Manifesto will be produced; as well, recommendations contained in the manifesto will be also forwarded to the steering committee of the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning conference series for their consideration.
Cite as

James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, Milene Santos Teixeira, and Frank Wolter. Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Seminar 22282). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 7, pp. 62-79, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{delgrande_et_al:DagRep.12.7.62,
  author =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Teixeira, Milene Santos and Wolter, Frank},
  title =	{{Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Seminar 22282)}},
  pages =	{62--79},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{12},
  number =	{7},
  editor =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Teixeira, Milene Santos and Wolter, Frank},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.12.7.62},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-176126},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.12.7.62},
  annote =	{Keywords: applications of logics, declarative representations, formal logic, knowledge representation and reasoning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.277
A Tarskian Informal Semantics for Answer Set Programming

Authors: Marc Denecker, Yuliya Lierler, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Joost Vennekens

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 17, Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12) (2012)

Abstract
In their seminal papers on stable model semantics, Gelfond and Lifschitz introduced ASP by casting programs as epistemic theories, in which rules represent statements about the knowledge of a rational agent. To the best of our knowledge, theirs is still the only published systematic account of the intuitive meaning of rules and programs under the stable semantics. In current ASP practice, however, we find numerous applications in which rational agents no longer seem to play any role. Therefore, we propose here an alternative explanation of the intuitive meaning of ASP programs, in which they are not viewed as statements about an agent's beliefs, but as objective statements about the world. We argue that this view is more natural for a large part of current ASP practice, in particular the so-called Generate-Define-Test programs.
Cite as

Marc Denecker, Yuliya Lierler, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Joost Vennekens. A Tarskian Informal Semantics for Answer Set Programming. In Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 17, pp. 277-289, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{denecker_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.277,
  author =	{Denecker, Marc and Lierler, Yuliya and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Vennekens, Joost},
  title =	{{A Tarskian Informal Semantics for Answer Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12)},
  pages =	{277--289},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-43-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{17},
  editor =	{Dovier, Agostino and Santos Costa, V{\'\i}tor},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.277},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-36295},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.277},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer set programming, informal semantics, generate-define-test}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.1
05171 Abstracts Collection – Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints

Authors: Gerhard Brewka, Ilkka Niemelä, Torsten Schaub, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Joost Vennekens

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
From 24.04.05 to 29.04.05, the Dagstuhl Seminar 05171 ``Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints'' was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.
Cite as

Gerhard Brewka, Ilkka Niemelä, Torsten Schaub, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Joost Vennekens. 05171 Abstracts Collection – Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-23, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brewka_et_al:DagSemProc.05171.1,
  author =	{Brewka, Gerhard and Niemel\"{a}, Ilkka and Schaub, Torsten and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Vennekens, Joost},
  title =	{{05171 Abstracts Collection – Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--23},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2690},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge representation, nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, answer-set programming, constraints}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.2
05171 Executive Summary – Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints

Authors: Gerhard Brewka, Ilkka Niemelä, Torsten Schaub, and Miroslaw Truszczynski

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
We provide a brief overview of the seminar and comment on most important research themes that emerged.
Cite as

Gerhard Brewka, Ilkka Niemelä, Torsten Schaub, and Miroslaw Truszczynski. 05171 Executive Summary – Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brewka_et_al:DagSemProc.05171.2,
  author =	{Brewka, Gerhard and Niemel\"{a}, Ilkka and Schaub, Torsten and Truszczynski, Miroslaw},
  title =	{{05171 Executive Summary – Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2607},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge representation, nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, answer-set programming, constraints}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.3
Answer Set Programming and Combinatorial Voting

Authors: Rafal Grabos

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
We show how Logic Programming with Ordered Disjunction (LPOD), the extension of answer set programming for handling preferences, may be used for representing and solving collective decision making problems. We present the notion of combinatorial vote problem in the context of LPOD and define various types of vote rules, used as decision criteria for determining optimal candidate for a group of voters. 15 min presentation
Cite as

Rafal Grabos. Answer Set Programming and Combinatorial Voting. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-15, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grabos:DagSemProc.05171.3,
  author =	{Grabos, Rafal},
  title =	{{Answer Set Programming and Combinatorial Voting}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--15},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2624},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Decision making, answer set programming, preferences}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.4
Modelling and Implementing a Knowledge Base for Checking Medical Invoices with DLV

Authors: Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Christoph Beierle, and Oliver Dusso

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
Checking medical invoices, done by every health insurance company, is a labor-intensive task. Both speed and quality of executing this task may be increased by the knowledge-based decision support system ACMI which we present in this paper. As the relevant regulations also contain various default rules, ACMI`s knowledge core is modelled using the answer set programming paradigm. It turned out that all relevant rules could be expressed directly in this framework, providing for a declarative and easily extendable and modifiable knowledge base. ACMI is implemented using the DLV system.
Cite as

Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Christoph Beierle, and Oliver Dusso. Modelling and Implementing a Knowledge Base for Checking Medical Invoices with DLV. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-12, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kernisberner_et_al:DagSemProc.05171.4,
  author =	{Kern-Isberner, Gabriele and Beierle, Christoph and Dusso, Oliver},
  title =	{{Modelling and Implementing a Knowledge Base for Checking Medical Invoices with DLV}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--12},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2610},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer sets, default rules, health insurance, rule schemas}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.5
Normal Form Theorem for Logic Programs with Cardinality Constraints

Authors: Victor W. Marek and Jeffrey B. Remmel

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
We discuss proof schemes, a kind of context-dependent proofs for logic programs. We show usefullness of these constructs both in the context of normal logic programs and their generalizations due to Niemela and collaborators. As an application we show the following result. For every cardinality-constraint logic program P there is a logic program P´ with the same heads, but with bodies consisting of atoms and negated atoms such that P and P´ have same stable models. It is worth noting that another proof of same result can be obtained from the results by Lifschitz and collaborators.
Cite as

Victor W. Marek and Jeffrey B. Remmel. Normal Form Theorem for Logic Programs with Cardinality Constraints. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-34, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{marek_et_al:DagSemProc.05171.5,
  author =	{Marek, Victor W. and Remmel, Jeffrey B.},
  title =	{{Normal Form Theorem for Logic Programs with Cardinality Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--34},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2598},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof scheme, cardinality constraints}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.6
Possibilistic Stable Models

Authors: Pascal Nicolas, Laurent Garcia, and Igor Stéphan

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
We present the main lines of a new framework that we have defined in order to improve the knowledge representation power of Answer Set Programming paradigm. Our proposal is to use notions from possibility theory to extend the stable model semantics by taking into account a certainty level, expressed in terms of necessity measure, on each rule of a normal logic program. First of all, we introduce possibilistic definite logic programs and show how to compute the conclusions of such programs both in syntactic and semantic ways. The syntactic handling is done by help of a fix-point operator, the semantic part relies on a possibility distribution on all sets of atoms and the two approaches are shown to be equivalent. In a second part, we define what is a possibilistic stable model for a normal logic program, with default negation. Again, we define a possibility distribution allowing to determine the stable models. We end our presentation by showing how we can use our framework to adressing inconsistency in Answer Set Programming.
Cite as

Pascal Nicolas, Laurent Garcia, and Igor Stéphan. Possibilistic Stable Models. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nicolas_et_al:DagSemProc.05171.6,
  author =	{Nicolas, Pascal and Garcia, Laurent and St\'{e}phan, Igor},
  title =	{{Possibilistic Stable Models}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2641},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non monotonic reasoning, uncertainty, possibility theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.7
Semantic Web Languages and Semantic Web Services as Application Areas for Answer Set Programming

Authors: Axel Polleres

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
In the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services areas there are still unclear issues concerning an appropriate language. Answer Set Programming and ASP engines can be particularly interesting for Ontological Reasoning, especially in the light of ongoing discussions of non-Monotonic extensions for Ontology Languages. Previously, the main concern of discussions was around OWL and Description Logics. Recently many extensions and suggestions for Rule Languages and Semantic Web Languages pop up, particularly in the the context of Semantic Web Services, which involve the meta-data description of Services instaead of static data on the Web only. These lanuages involve SWRL, WSML, SWSL-Rules, etc. I want to give an outline of languages, challenges and initiatives in this area and where I think Answer Set Programming research can hook in. (30min).
Cite as

Axel Polleres. Semantic Web Languages and Semantic Web Services as Application Areas for Answer Set Programming. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{polleres:DagSemProc.05171.7,
  author =	{Polleres, Axel},
  title =	{{Semantic Web Languages and Semantic Web Services as Application Areas for Answer Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2631},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, Rule Lagnuages, RDF, RDFS, OWL, WSMO, WSML, OWL-S, SWSL, SWSF}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.8
Set Based Logic Programming

Authors: Jeffrey B. Remmel and Victor W. Marek

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (2005)

Abstract
We propose a set of desiderata for extensions of Answer Set Programming to capture domains where the objects of interest are infinite sets and yet we can still process ASP programs effectively. We propose two different schemes to do this. One is to extend cardinality type constraints to set constraints which involve codes for finite, recursive and recursively enumerable sets. A second scheme to modify logic programming to reason about sets directly. In this setting, we can also augment logic programming with certain monotone inductive operators so that we can reason about families of sets which have structure such a closed sets of a topological space or subspaces of a vector space. We observe that under such conditions, the classic Gelfond-Lifschitz construction generalizes to at least two different notions of stable models.
Cite as

Jeffrey B. Remmel and Victor W. Marek. Set Based Logic Programming. In Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5171, pp. 1-26, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{remmel_et_al:DagSemProc.05171.8,
  author =	{Remmel, Jeffrey B. and Marek, Victor W.},
  title =	{{Set Based Logic Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints},
  pages =	{1--26},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{5171},
  editor =	{Gerhard Brewka and Ilkka Niemel\"{a} and Torsten Schaub and Miroslaw Truszczynski},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2667},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.05171.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: ASP, codes for infinite sets, stable model generalizations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemRep.354
Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (Dagstuhl Seminar 02381)

Authors: Gerhard Brewka, Ilkka Niemelä, Torsten Schaub, and Miroslaw Truszczynski

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Reports. Dagstuhl Seminar Reports, Volume 1 (2021)

Abstract
Cite as

Gerhard Brewka, Ilkka Niemelä, Torsten Schaub, and Miroslaw Truszczynski. Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (Dagstuhl Seminar 02381). Dagstuhl Seminar Report 354, pp. 1-18, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2003)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@TechReport{brewka_et_al:DagSemRep.354,
  author =	{Brewka, Gerhard and Niemel\"{a}, Ilkka and Schaub, Torsten and Truszczynski, Miroslaw},
  title =	{{Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints (Dagstuhl Seminar 02381)}},
  pages =	{1--18},
  ISSN =	{1619-0203},
  year =	{2003},
  type = 	{Dagstuhl Seminar Report},
  number =	{354},
  institution =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemRep.354},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-152348},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemRep.354},
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Truszczynski, Miroslaw
  • 3 Brewka, Gerhard
  • 3 Niemelä, Ilkka
  • 3 Schaub, Torsten
  • 2 Marek, Victor W.
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • 1 Theory of computation → Complexity theory and logic

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Knowledge representation
  • 2 answer-set programming
  • 2 constraints
  • 2 logic programming
  • 2 nonmonotonic reasoning
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 11 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 8 2005
  • 1 2003
  • 1 2012
  • 1 2023

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023 Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact