1 Search Results for "Nakahara, Jorge"


Document
Mini-ciphers: a reliable testbed for cryptanalysis?

Authors: Jorge Nakahara and Daniel Santana de Freitas

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9031, Symmetric Cryptography (2009)


Abstract
This paper reports on higher-order square analysis of the AES cipher. We present experimental results of attack simulations on mini-AES versions with word sizes of 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 bits and describe the propagation of higher-order Lambda-sets inside some of these distinguishers. A possible explanation of the length of the square distinguishers uses the concept of higher-order derivatives of discrete mappings.

Cite as

Jorge Nakahara and Daniel Santana de Freitas. Mini-ciphers: a reliable testbed for cryptanalysis?. In Symmetric Cryptography. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9031, pp. 1-13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nakahara_et_al:DagSemProc.09031.9,
  author =	{Nakahara, Jorge and Santana de Freitas, Daniel},
  title =	{{Mini-ciphers: a reliable testbed for cryptanalysis?}},
  booktitle =	{Symmetric Cryptography},
  pages =	{1--13},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{9031},
  editor =	{Helena Handschuh and Stefan Lucks and Bart Preneel and Phillip Rogaway},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.09031.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19614},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.09031.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mini-ciphers, higher-order square attacks}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Nakahara, Jorge
  • 1 Santana de Freitas, Daniel

  • Refine by Classification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Mini-ciphers
  • 1 higher-order square attacks

  • Refine by Type
  • 1 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2009

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail