Dagstuhl Manifestos

ISSN 2193-2433


Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10

Issue 1 (2024)

  • Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 9

Issue 1 (2021)

  • Web Futures: Inclusive, Intelligent, Sustainable The 2020 Manifesto for Web Science (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 18262)
  • Diversity in News Recommendation (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 19482)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 8

Issue 1 (2020)

  • Implementing FAIR Data Infrastructures (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 18472)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 7

Issue 1 (2018)

  • Research Directions for Principles of Data Management (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16151)
  • QoE Vadis? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16472)
  • Tensor Computing for Internet of Things (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16152)
  • Present and Future of Formal Argumentation (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15362)
  • From Evaluating to Forecasting Performance: How to Turn Information Retrieval, Natural Language Processing and Recommender Systems into Predictive Sciences (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 17442)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 6

Issue 1 (2017)

  • Engineering Academic Software (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16252)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 5

Issue 1 (2015)

  • Connecting Performance Analysis and Visualization (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 14022)
  • Privacy and Security in an Age of Surveillance (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 14401)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 4

Issue 1 (2014)

  • Massive Open Online Courses: Current State and Perspectives (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 14112)
  • Co-Design of Systems and Applications for Exascale (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12212)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 3

Issue 1 (2013)

  • Machine Learning Methods for Computer Security (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12371)
  • ICT for Bridging Biology and Medicine (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 13342)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 2

Issue 1 (2012)

  • Social, Supply-Chain, Administrative, Business, Commerce, Political networks: a multi-discipline perspective (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12182)
  • Computation and Palaeography: Potentials and Limits (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12382)
Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 1

Issue 1 (2011)

  • Online Privacy: Towards Informational Self-Determination on the Internet (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 11061)
  • Modeling, Analysis, and Verification - The Formal Methods Manifesto 2010 (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 10482)
  • Improving The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 11331)

Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops complement Dagstuhl Seminars. They look beyond recent research far into the future, trying to identify new goals, fields and applications of computer science. The scope of Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops includes reflection about the state of individual or overlapping fields.
Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops are more oriented towards a small group of internationally renowned senior researchers for an intensive discussion with a focus on strategy. In contrast to Dagstuhl Seminars they do not refer to their current research results but reflect the state of a field, identify strengths and weaknesses, determine promising new developments and relevant new problems, and seek synergies between different fields. Initiated in 2011, the series Dagstuhl Manifestos publishes the manifestos resulting from Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops.

The journal Dagstuhl Manifestos is published in one volume with one issue per year.

Aims and Scope

The manifestos from Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops are published in the journal Dagstuhl Manifesto.

The goal is to describe the state-of-the-art in a field along with its shortcomings and strenghts. Based on this, position statements and perspectives for the future should be described.

A manifesto typically has a less technical character; instead it provides guidelines and roadmaps for a sustainable organization of future progress.

Open Access Policy
The periodical Dagstuhl Manifestos is peer-reviewed and is published as an open access journal, i.e., the content is accessible online and free of charge. The authors retain their copyright.
Dagstuhl Manifestos are published under a Creative Commons CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
The metadata provided by Dagstuhl Publishing on its webpages, as well as their export formats (such as XML or BibTeX) available at our website, is released under the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication license (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode).

Processing Charge
For the series Dagstuhl Manifestos, no fee is charged.

Each issue is assigned a DOI and a URN.
Each article is assigned a DOI and a URN.
To facilitate author identification, the Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) is optionally included during upload so that authors can be uniquely linked to their ORCID iD.

Longterm Preservation
The digital archiving of each issue is done in cooperation with the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek/German National Library (http://www.dnb.de).

Publication Ethics
Dagstuhl Publishing as a division of Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik GmbH (LZI, or Schloss Dagstuhl for short) and its series and journals adhere to CORE practices guidance laid by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and are committed to the rules of good scientific practice in accordance with the guidelines of the Leibniz Association and the German Research Foundation (DFG). We expect all parties (so authors, editors, and reviewers) involved in the publication and review process of contributions to be published in the series to follow these core practises and the guidelines. Allegations of misconduct will be investigated in accordance with the COPE Best Practice Guidelines as far as is practicable. If notified of a potential breach of publication ethics, we encourage editors and authors to inform Dagstuhl Publishing contact as soon as possible. Detailed information can be found on the Publication Ethics website.


The Scientific Directorate of Schloss Dagstuhl acts as editorial board. The task of the Scientific Directorate is to implement the Center's designated purpose in a scientific and subject-matter capacity. It convenes twice a year to establish the research and event program, ensure the quality of the Center's offerings, and monitor how the program is put into practice.

Members of the Scientific Directorate are the Scientific Director and as many scientific experts as necessary and appropriate for the competent evaluation of important computer science fields.

Members of the Scientific Directorate are appointed by the Supervisory Board following a joint proposal by the Scientific Director and the Scientific Advisory Board. Proposals are collated by the Scientific Director in collaboration with the Scientific Advisory Board based on proposals from the shareholders, the Scientific Directorate, and the Scientific Advisory Board.

Info for Authors

The composition of Dagstuhl Manifestos is highly individual. It is up to the organisers of the Perspectives Workshop, who also act as editors of the Manifesto, to organise the composition of the Manifesto. Therefore, manifesto authors should contact the editors directly for further information.


Not found?

Didn't find what you are looking for? Don't hesitate to leave us message at publishing@dagstuhl.de!

Templates and Example Files

Please download the current version of the DagMan style along with an example file:

dagman-v2021 v2021.1.3

For older releases and an issue tracker, see our GitHub archive.

Editorship / Authorship

The organizers of the Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop are going to act as editors of the manifesto. The authorship of each chapter/section written is appropriately mentioned in the manifesto.


Not found?

Didn't find what you are looking for? Don't hesitate to leave us message at publishing@dagstuhl.de!


Yes, we expect our Perspective Workshops to prepare a Dagstuhl Report and a Dagstuhl Manifesto.

The Dagstuhl Reports series aims at documenting a seminar/workshop; the report is not reviewed. See http://www.dagstuhl.de/dagrep.
(We expect the submission of the report 3 months after the workshop/seminar.)

A Dagstuhl Manifesto aims at describing the state of the art of the field and proposing visions and perspectives. The manifesto is reviewed by the scientific directorate of Dagstuhl. The manifesto targets both the scientific community and "political" stakeholders (such as funding agencies, EU departments, ...). See http://www.dagstuhl.de/dagman.
(We expect the submission of the manifesto ~6 months after the seminar.)

Not found?

Didn't find what you are looking for? Don't hesitate to leave us message at publishing@dagstuhl.de!

Contact Dagstuhl Publishing
Dagstuhl Publishing Team